 We understand that people, EU citizens want more Europe when it comes to health care, public health care. Is the European Commission planning any kind of specific initiative? Maybe, first of all, also to show the importance of health is the EU for Health programme. And with the EU for Health programme, there are 9.4 billion being proposed as a budget for health exclusively for health in Europe. That's actually 23 times more than before. So this EU for Health programme would be looking at tackling cross-border health threats, making medicines available and affordable, reducing inequalities. Is there a feeling, this kind of feeling in the European Commission, that the approach should be a holistic one? I mean, there is no solely climate discussion, it's also linked to public health. Do you believe that we will get rid of this fragmented approach at the policy level from now on? One of the issues is the impact of medicines on environment. So maybe if you would look at previous approaches, they were not so clearly spelled out. So I think that's a clear indication that the more holistic approach is certainly there. We have a question from a participant who basically asks if Member States should collaborate also closer in the training of medical staff. I think this is extremely important and not only for crisis management, but just in general, if we allow doctors to move across Europe and to be able to practice medicine wherever they are in any Member States, it's clear that there should be a common standard and quality standards. So yes, clearly. How can we make sure that we will avoid a two-speed scenario when it comes to the European beautification process from now on? We are not going backwards, we're not going to resubsidize fossil fuels and all technologies. It's like the analogy with the burning house that I make. That's for me the conditionality. I mean, it's not pushing for austerity and it's not pushing for macroeconomic reforms that will damage social policies and ecological policies in Member States. That's exactly what happened 10 years ago. We've seen what it did to res, for instance. We have the vaccine strategy and we are trying to be ahead as much as possible of certain developments so that we can make sure that vaccines will be available to priority groups first. It is not a big secret that such a vaccine will not be available in 6 billion doses at Hock for the whole population of the world. So we have to go step by step, but the Commission is really doing what it can. But we can't say, well, we have a vaccine problem solved back to business as usual. That would be a big mistake. We have to learn the lessons from this crisis starting from why we had this pandemic, how could it exist and what to do to make sure that we don't have other issues like that in the future. We have to learn how to build resilient, better systems for the future from this crisis.