 Hello and welcome to my latest review of this, the Forbidden Manifesto 2020, the greatest manifesto in the country and I say that with confidence and I challenge you to find me a better one and that's a real challenge by the way. Today I want to cover law and order and given the week or a couple of weeks that's been in it I think it's rather apt. We've had more grooming gang scandals involving Greater Manchester Police on this occasion. We've had a terror attack in Streatham in South London and in the midst of it all the madness of our completely broken down and I was wondering as I was thinking about this I thought is it alarmist to say that law and order is broken down or is it one of those things that every generation thinks you know the country has gone to the dogs but even if it is even if it is this is our generation this is our time and these are our issues. I published a blog this morning saying that this was our first priority and I meant it. Law and order is it must be a primary primary objective because our society can't function without it and I believe that our people are confused actually confused at the seeming irrelevance of the law when it's convenient and when the police ignore the law when the overly politicized police and this happened after the murder of Stephen Lawrence the politicization of the police and the racialization of the police really took off at that point and the McPherson inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence recommended that policing not be colorblind so it introduced the notion that people of different colors could have different treatment by police so depending on who they're dealing with the ethnicity for example of who they're dealing with police just ignore the laws you know the it's it's it's an extraordinary thing when reports are telling the police not to enforce the law equally among all people people are confused and if the police can ignore the law and if the police can decide for political reasons how and when to enforce it then then what else is there what is the police ignore the law then what's the point of the law there's no solid ground for us to stand on when the law means nothing it is absolutely crucial that we restore the authority of the law now this is the longest section of our manifesto and for that reason I don't want to make these videos too long the longer videos are the fewer people watch them so in the name of as many people as possible watching the video and please do share these videos please please share them with friends and family I am going to keep the commentary to a minimum and actually restrict it to the initial part of of the manifesto proposals so as with the other videos I'll start I'll read through it and add a little bit of commentary as I say I'll restrict I'll restrict the commentary on this occasion because the video will be too long okay so start the UK faces many problems none greater than the breakdown of law and order and the Orwellian politicization of policing Britain is a divided society where some people by virtue of their racial or religious characteristics are effectively permitted to live outside the law the democratic concept of one law for all has been dismantled now I we probably think of that in terms of criminal law immediately and the police and how they deal differently with different racial or religious groups however that's not the only example the another example for example would be a Sharia councils this is family law or other religious councils but this is primarily with the largest number of religious tribunals etc are Sharia ones by by a massive margin and this is family law and this is family law that is taking place essentially it's got no legal backing it doesn't have the backing of the state but that doesn't mean it has no power it is powerful in its own communities and the rules applied in terms of domestic violence which by the way is a criminal offence but is heard in Sharia councils and child custody and child custody part is crucial because British law provides lots of instruction on the living arrangements for children upon divorce of the breakdown of a relationship and these are completely ignored when child custody decisions are made in religious tribunals for example so living outside the law the criminal law is not the only example family law is also hugely hugely affected in this regard this is largely due to senior police staff adhering to sinister extreme left values espoused by secretive groups such as common purpose and to the racist proposals put forward following the murder of Stephen Lawrence in London the McPherson inquiry forced police to treat people required police to treat people differently depending upon their race we must and will reverse this and let me just step back a little bit to common purpose now as some people believe that common purpose is a conspiracy matter and that the organization isn't actually reality it is it really exists it's got a website though it's very secretive you can read its website and it says very little but few things that we do know and I'm going to link to some articles below from the Daily Mail who has written about common purpose more than once for example Cressida Dick who is the commissioner of the Metropolitan Police no less is a graduate from common purpose have a read of these articles they are alarming for Britain maintains that effective policing is vital for any society to flourish I think that's obvious why that is it provides us with clarity with solidity with a structure with within which to live it should be a top priority for government again fairly obvious I would have thought we also recognize that policing in Britain has been decimated in terms of police numbers under both the coalition and conservative governments a staggering 20,000 police officers have been lost since 2009 that is a huge number one of our a we've I'll link to an article below that was published on our website this morning from an ex-officer an ex-policeman who is asking the question of Boris Johnson has promised to restore those 20,000 so do we however he hasn't necessarily made the promise that they will be a police and not social justice warriors which is what this article asks are we getting PCs or SJWs have a read of it we need of course police not SJWs we've had quite enough SJWs by which I mean social justice warriors by which I mean the progressive loony left it doesn't get much more loony than the loony left at the moment police stations continue to close across the country and despite dwindling resources police priorities are rooted towards silencing dissent rather than punishing crime an example here is why London descends into unprecedented levels of violent crime under Labour's Mayor Sadiq Khan who has in the past effectively washed his hands of the whole thing the Metropolitan Police the police of London has dedicated more than 900 officers to so-called hate crime now 900 people is a lot of people you know have a think about it 900 it's quite a few people and if you could put those 900 back out onto the streets to deal with deal with violent crime I think we'd be far better off in London than we are equality before the law is a fundamental facet of the British justice system or at least it was the concept of hate crime undermines this principle and gives special status to certain groups it allows the creation of a quote-unquote crime where no substantive crime has been committed an example of this would be police noting non-crime incidents now incidents which do not amount to criminal offences are still being recorded by the police in case they should turn into a crime at some point in the future this person you know this is a science fiction it's a bad science fiction movie the police recording incidents which are not crimes if it's not a crime it is not the concern of the police I would rather and I'm sure most of the people in this country would rather the police got on with actual crimes rather than creating a new category for them to deal with of non-crimes non-crimes none of the police's concern for Britain rejects this and demands that we are all treated equally for Britain would abolish the concept of hate crime whilst maintaining certain protections for juveniles again it's fairly self explanatory that we are all equal a crime against one of us is every bit as serious as a crime against another moving on magistrates courts deal with 97% of cases in England and Wales business criminal cases prior to 2005 they were managed by committees in an entirely independent system in which local communities undertook responsibility for the application of the law within their district in 2005 these committees were abolished and the courts fell under the management of a government agency now called Her Majesty's courts and tribunal service local justice areas have been merged and courthouses closed and court clerks have become civil service subject to direct pressure from government and what's happened there is the centralization of the court systems and I believe and our party's policy is that we relocalize and restore the independence of the court and justice system at the more centralized the system becomes the more political it becomes and the more politically pressured it becomes we must restore local autonomy in terms of magistrates courts and other tribunals etc and restore local authority over the courts and justice system to de-politicize and de-centralize this is absolutely crucial and with the centralization as I say came this massive pressure and we can see the day-to-day result of that which is the overt politicization of our courts system it's no longer dealing with people on an equal footing it applies political correctness and that is political the politicization of our legal system whilst prison is expensive and undoubtedly has a detrimental effect on the lives of those that are incarcerated reluctance to use prison when appropriate places the public at risk weakens the laws deterrent effect and diminishes the effectiveness of non custodial sentences now what we're saying here is that yes prison is expensive but I would suggest it's a priority spending priority people do need to go to prison when they commit especially when they commit violent crimes crimes that cause a great deal of personal damage to people now we must we must restore prison as a punishment and indeed as a deterrent and that means greater sentences and longer sentences let's undo the culture of suspended sentences reduce sentences for pleading guilty all of these issues need to be transformed because what we have is not a punitive justice system at all people are getting meager sentences if they're getting custodial sentences at all we want the the principle of prisoners punishment has to be restored and prison as an option you know this idea that criminals are you know equally victim are equal victims to they the people they actually victimized this is the sort of left-wing injection isn't it this insane injection of left wing the criminal and the victim are equal everyone is a victim we must stop this we must restore the notion of the guilty and the innocent in a free society moving on in a free society any person should have the freedom to wear whatever clothing they choose for the purposes that clothing is normally worn so comfort decency utility or style however face coverings whether worn to comply with conservative religious mores or to conceal the wearer's identity are detrimental to social cohesion and the public god and just as the stop clock is right twice a day the european court of human rights has ruled in the case of france banning the broker it ruled that france was correct in banning the broker because france argued that it was detrimental to social cohesion and the european court of human rights agreed moving on for centuries judicial review has been the principal way in which public bodies including the government are held to account by the public in the complex modern world where power often resides in centralized bureaucracies the right to review administrative decisions has become more important to the individual citizen yet the government has attempted to restrict the class of people who can seek judicial review and increase the costs and potential awards following a uh an unsuccessful claim this is a dishonorable attempt on the part of government to avoid scrutiny and accountability by ordinary people now if a government makes our ability to hold them to account in the courts more difficult uh restricts our reasons or our legal abilities our legal arguments uh to do so and makes it more expensive don't you smell a rat i really do it it should be simple and uh cost effective easy for people to have the ability to hold the powerful to account and for britain will introduce that and i'll explain uh when we read the actually policy proposals how we intend to do that finally sex crime is an alarming problem in uk society and one for which people seek justice and criminal punishment uh we certainly do the rape of children for example is about as grievous a crime as is imaginable and people want real punishment for this however a social change must also take place and i maintain that that's the truth uh we have got a culture of over sexualization of children uh go on to say the sexualization of children for example is a growing concern among parents and there is evidence to suggest that even police have disregarded the notion of statutory rape that is sex with minors and hell that young girls involved in the so-called grooming gangs where willing participants despite their age for britain believes a dramatic change in attitude must take place with regard to sexuality particularly involving young people and this must begin with the law uh at my own personal view on that is that the sexualization of children is actually really um how do i put it it makes me very uncomfortable um and i think that sex is an adult activity um and when i was a kid it was an adult activity and i think it's taken away a lot of innocence from childhood and i would like to see that i mean i'm not a prude but i would like to see that uh restored uh so i will read quickly uh what are we on 16 minutes okay i will read through this is about three pages long so i will read through them with minimum or very little commentary okay so here are the actual policy proposals we're putting forward and i'll begin with where i left off on sexuality for britain will raise the age of sexual consent to 18 now this is a little bit controversial and i'll just offer a little bit of commentary on this one you have to be uh 18 to vote to drink alcohol um to have you know in law to be considered an adult although at 16 you can do certain things with parental permission at 18 you are considered an adult now i don't therefore understand why the age of sexual consent is 16 it should surely be 18 the consequences uh of unprotected sex for example uh the consequences of promiscuity for example uh not just uh in terms of of disease but in terms of emotional health and mental health uh the con you know the consequences of promiscuity cannot truly i don't think be understood perhaps even by an 18 year old but certainly 16 i consider to be too young and we put this to the vote of our party members who voted uh that our policy should be to raise the age of consent to 18 and i actually think it will be a popular policy okay remove the police from political control by policing and crime commissioners mayors and devolved assemblies for britain recognizes that the police need to be accountable to the local populace and as such will introduce a public sector accountability act to allow people to hold senior police officers accountable for failure to perform their basic duty uh now we've talked about the uh public sector accountability act before it will be accompanied um by a constitutional court which will hear uh arguments on this and one a perfect example from from recently will be the the greater Manchester police admitting and apologizing for turning a blind eye or you know to to doing nothing let's call it what it is doing nothing but the rape of children in the area now the heads should be rolling heads aren't rolling and i believe that the public rather than the police themselves to punish each other for their wrongdoing or their failures to to live up to their basic duty i believe the public should have the ability to do it to to remove those people from their jobs uh and take their pension away do that a few times and watch the culture of the police change this is how it's done reform her majesty's inspectorate of constabulary from being a puppet of the government to impartial judge of police service professionalism this is all part of the decentralization of our justice system and the relocalization of it because centralization equals politicization prevent further merging of police forces and give consideration to restoring smaller national forces smaller forces rooted in local communities or specific activities whilst retaining the national crime agency fairly self-explanatory look at bringing back the smaller smaller forces that have been merged reverse the outsourcing of policing roles such as control room custody facilities and the forensic science service i think that the privatization of crucial elements of the public sector shouldn't take place and that the taxpayers pound should be spent on the taxpayer increase police numbers to at least 2010 levels improve pay and restore the status of the office of constable wouldn't that be nice again going back to my own childhood we were afraid of the police i'm not necessarily saying that that's a positive thing but respect respect at least i mean it has to be we need to reform the police as well i mean the police a lot of police in my experience a small number not the majority would have to do a lot to earn my respect quite frankly but i do respect the police as a body i know how hard they work but this this this left-wingization has reduced a lot of respect for the police and we should restore it remove magistrates court from the management of majesties courts and tribunal service and re-establish local independent magistrates courts committees responsible for their own staff who are no longer subject to civil servant management framework we've gone into this part again it's the refers to the decentralization of police and courts systems place any discounting of a guilty plea at the discretion of the prosecutor to offer or withhold this by reference to the strength of evidence views of witnesses and public interest now this is referring to what i mentioned briefly which is reduced sentences for example for guilty please let's look at that again let's not have it as an automatic let's have it at the discretion based upon the evidence uh and witnesses of public interest etc so no let's not automatically reduce sentences based upon a guilty plea abolish suspended sentences if a judge considers that a case is serious enough to warrant a custodial sentences a sentence release should only be granted on compassionate grounds or following substantial efforts at reform such as the completion of training and education courses now this seems it's a little bit black and white but actually i think it's very powerful why suspend sentences surely if a an offense is as it says here is serious enough to warrant a custodial sentence that custodial sentence should be served abolish all distinct racially or religiously aggravated offenses inciting hatred based upon religion and all statutory aggregating factors based upon the victim's personal characteristics again we've covered this one laugh for all ban face coverings in public this will exclude special festivals or events such as Halloween during which face coverings would expected would be expected to be worn i think that's fairly self-explanatory and would apply mostly to the broker or the nick help this also appears in our islam policy that we would ban the broker as a security threat ensure that no however before i move on from this it would also be talking about antifa for example covering their faces while harassing people in the streets ensure that no arbitration ruling or any party's expectations based upon cultural norms upon entering into a relationship are enforced by british courts if it amounts to direct or indirect discrimination as defined in the equality act and what this essentially means is that culture if the culture says people are not equal that culture is dismissed it will not be considered any cultural norms or expectations will not be considered as mitigation otherwise in the courtroom ensure that in determining any party's rights following the ending of a relationship no regard should be paid to cultural or religious expectations that are inconsistent with the principle of equality as defined in the equality act again it's an expansion on the previous point ensure it has made a criminal offense for any person to participate in a religious trial in relation to marital status or the upbringing of children that purports to supersede uk law and i mentioned the sharia family tribunals earlier this would largely apply to not just to those but to religious tribunals in general it will be a criminal offense to hold what is essentially a a made-up show trial but doing serious things you cannot just set up a court in your living room and purport to be a court this should be a criminal offense and we know that in the sharia system for example women who often have no idea of their rights who are kept encased in closed off communities are told that the sharia tribunal is the law of the land and they have to obey it this is a criminal offense establish a special criminal court to try terrorism cases these this court will be more inquisitorial nature than the uk's traditional adversarial criminal court system and prioritize ascertaining facts and protecting the public over traditional procedural shields for the defense again we would set up a specific court for terrorism cases because they are different we are dealing with a war like situation we are not dealing with crimes within british society we are dealing with uh political crimes against british society as a whole and therefore it is entirely legitimate to treat terrorism cases differently uh and to have a separate court system abolish any degree requirement and prevent direct entry at senior level this the police service is being destroyed by political correctness and the degree requirement will put all recruits into the hands of marxist lecturers you do not need a degree to do a bobby's job it also means police officers start their careers in debt like other graduates it is not a good idea for a policeman to be in debt in fact it was a disciplinary offence at one time because it makes them vulnerable to manipulation uh you need a degree to uh well debolish we need a degree to be policemen now the police woman uh ridiculous ridiculous and of course what this does is send the police through the university system and we all know actually my next next policy i'll cover will be education but we all know what the universities are like absolutely not just left wing extreme left wing and so by the time the police are on the street they have been through three years of indoctrination in left wing universities direct entry at senior level we should get rid of that as well so people must serve their time uh do their do their years build their way up to senior level so that they know the job of the people they know from long years of experience they know the job of the people walking under them this is common sense ensure the police are using a meritocratic recruitment and promotion system which is blind to race and gender and does not chase targets some forces currently have ethnic or gender targets which result in some unsuitable people being recruited and promoted now there's there is you know there is we certainly need women and the police we certainly need uh you know i understand the argument that you're going to need that you know to build trust between communities and police if you have an entirely white police force and maybe non-white people will be less likely to trust you and i you know as much as i don't agree with that i get where that argument is coming from what we actually need to my mind is a higher quality of police because to my mind if the police officer in question is good enough at their job they will be trusted by a person regardless of the k of the skin color or the uh or the sex um so i i this argument is is a complex one uh but on balance we must go we must have a meritocratic society we must have the best people for the job and we must have a high standard and high quality and high levels of training for such a vital job and i don't doubt that our people are up to that there are wonderful incredible hard-working people in this country and i have don't doubt that we can produce an extremely high class of police officer based on merit that will include men women black white uh and people it be it be because it doesn't you know merit doesn't necessarily mean everyone's going to be a white man but we must have a meritocratic and fair society uh and in the police just as elsewhere so that's our law and order policy it's extensive it covers various different areas and i do believe it's what this country needs it's clear it's focused and it is fundamental in its priority i call this our first priority because that's what it is law and order must be restored in order for our society to function and for justice and fairness in society to flourish i'll be back next week with education and uh another absolutely crucial area and our policies once again uh what this country is crying out for uh have a look on our website for britain.uk get in touch with us inquiries at for britain.uk or join us by texting join to 60777 do get on board thank you