 The debate has been very interesting, but I just would like to answer to two comments, one from India, the other one from Venezuela. For India, of course, nobody is saying that we have to direct the remittance into certain activities. But you can build incentives so that both remittances go to certain type of activities better than others. And this is actually the one project that we are building with IOM in the cell, which is to build the innovative finance tools that will help the remittance money go more into productive areas on land issues. So this is one thing. For the question of the responsibilities of companies into climate change and the way that they work into certain areas, companies generally are there because the government has given them the right to be there. And what we are saying is that whatever company is doing any kind of project into any place of the world should be in an obligation to restore as much as it destroys. But that, of course, will mean that at the level of government regulation should be taken so that we can then enforce that type of regulations into private sector industry.