 Direct replicant, thanks for the accent, Brad. Thank you, Tom, Brad. I'll be over here with the potatoes and vodka. Same thing. What's that? Potato juice. That's what I drink every night. Yeah. All right. Direct replication, folks. Super, super simple. When you're in the small n or the single subject realm, you have to realize that you're not going to have generality just based on the subjects that participate in your studies. So we have to worry about replication. That becomes the big key. The first type of replication we worry about is direct replication, which is where you just copy the damn experiment, do it over again. I tend to argue, probably incorrectly, and I'm sure someone will point out down there below that I'm wrong, but whatever, that you can do a direct replication from another researcher, right? So I just replicate exactly their conditions, right? So if I read a study in an article and I want to try it in my lab, I just replicate it. I don't vary anything. Now, some will argue that's a systematic replication, and I'll even make that argument in a few minutes. So anyway, direct replication, copy everything dead on, rerun the experiment, and see if you get the same results.