 And what brings you here today, sir? Well, Julius, I just feel it's an injustice, and I'm pretty sure I know where this is going. The guy's only a reporter. I'm not a reporter, so I'm not covering any industry here. I woke up this morning and they're coming up. I'm working tomorrow, it's my day off, and I just feel that this guy's going to America to die, and I just think that's inhumane is obscene. They'll do one of two things. You are not rendered a decision for weeks or months to let them rot there, or they might let him appeal on one point that ultimately he won't win on. There's a lot of incentive to drag it out, the elections, and then also, as Niels Melser says, it's about destroying him. What this process is really about is destroying him. And that's what they've done for almost five years now in Belmark, and then with the seven years, so that's my guess. Do you think it's more likely they'll keep them there and just rotting in prison for a year or the United States until people forget about it? I think the CIA wants an eventual pay. They want to make him pay, and you just had the whistleblower who gave the documents for Vault 7, just got 40 years. They want to make him pay, but they'll make him suffer first. Do you think there's anybody in the higher-ups that can either of these countries that would be willing to stick out their nets for that? No. Nobody that you know of. Absolute pieces of shit, and they've shown it. This whole judicial process is farcical from the beginning. They've trampling over their own most basic judicial norms, just ignored them. Yeah. This has been an intensely political matter from day one. I understand that you and a few of your colleagues have written to James Cleverly, asking for a full review of Junior Sonders' health. Have you had a reply? No. No reply at all? No reply at all. Here because I think the more people hear the better, and it needs more traction, because honestly, I didn't even know this was happening until a few days ago when a friend mentioned it, and I didn't even know the whole story behind you and you understand. And I think that's appealing, appalling, so I'm appalling. And I think that's mainly because no one's mentioned it, and not enough people have paid attention to what's going on, so I'm here to make sure more people know about it, and there's more people showing up for Junior Sonders. I came today because I was astounded that I had very little knowledge of what happened in the last five years concerning this case. When, to me, it was something that was historical, when it's incredibly current, and when you look into the most basic things of it, it's so clear that it's something that isn't really illegal, and makes no sense when you think that we should have a free press. This goes in direct opposition to that. Would you be joining us for the march? Absolutely. I think very necessary to show the direct presence in front of the government that doesn't seem to be present at all, that the people actually care about this and the people won't change for these kinds of situations. So yeah, that's what I thought. Fantastic. Is that a French accent I'm getting there? Yes, it is. Okay, so there's a fine tradition of active resistance in France, isn't it? There is. I'm trying to perpetrate it here, but yeah, it's very much... I can't look at a case like this and sit at home. You have to be here and you have to show up and show that you care. That's very cool to my values, so that's why I'm here. Thank you, Andrew. Thank you, Jamie. Thank you. See you at the House of Parliament. See you.