 in your research direction, maybe you personally, maybe someone else who would continue that work. What are the most interesting problems as you see them from a kind of scientific standpoint? And if any of them, do you see even your future potential? Actually, here you can see there are so many parameters. And most of them are discussed, but there are some which are like the Swedish correction, which is related to the humidity loss. There are maybe very few papers or publications related to this. There are definitions of my model code, but very solved with the results from laboratories. Laboratory labs, maybe there will be one separate one for this parameter. And I think in my work, the worst part, we have faced and we spend a lot of time to consider the parameters of the Swedish correction, which should be discussed. And also, as I mentioned, depending on the correct argument of factors, maybe this would be not as broad work as for Swedish correction. This is also a parameter that might be separately discussed in a way that it might be applied to this one. This to our thing. Thank you. Thank you. And one more thing that, as I mentioned, we are considering to do also the life-long analysis, which is much easier part of the work than we have done. Much smaller, but actually we'll finish this part or not. But this is also maybe the continuation. They might put all the life-long analysis of the concrete in just one order and analyze it. Can I ask a question? I believe the representatives of the construction company that initially brought up the idea of Rosmy going to Spain to study, you guys are here, right? It's the same company we're talking about. How do you take academic knowledge and information like this? How do you process that in your company? What is the way in which companies process this kind of information? I think that's interesting for us because we want to communicate this to companies, obviously, eventually. So let me ask you a question. We are not only a construction company, there is also a representative from the engineer that is supervising the work. Unfortunately, from the ministry, no one came today, but they were also invited. As a representative of the construction company, I would say that, for example, the doctor that was made here, no, it's inside a more global plan that our company has an agreement with the University of Barcelona in which we exchange information, new technologies, researches, investigation, not only in this aspect of concrete, but in more aspects. So continuously, we have people in the university in Barcelona which are helping us in the day-by-day, not specific case, like when there is a problem, for example, developing the job-mix formula that is done for the construction of the concrete payment. We have, let's say, our internal and local staff, which I think we are experiencing now. We have in our headquarters specific people that are specializing in this term, and external help from universities. In that case, in this project in Armenia, we have one collaboration with the University of Barcelona. So this is a day-by-day communication. I think it's very good, because it's not merely from outside the idea of construction. It's just to do the work run, to make it like with the less cost, and as fast as possible. In reality, it's not like this, or at least we are trying not to be like this. We like the idea of giving the opportunity, like for him, for Masjida Seán, for the exchange community, as knowledge to bring it back to Armenia, to develop something like this. Also, this technology, this knowledge that is in universities, to bring it to the side, to inform people that will develop continuously in this country or in another. And if we are doing day-by-day, it's not just a problem that we are trying to solve in one point. It's a communication, and it's a chain of information that is done continuously. So this maybe is very theoretical for our day-by-day construction work, your research. But there are other ways in which the university can help us with all the kind of models that can be applied to the construction work. This maybe is for design. I guess the main conclusion that you can get for a model like this will have more benefits in the design moment of a project in which you can change the inputs. You will have, like, immediately, let's say, different scenarios, and you can choose which one will be for you. When the design is already made, when there is not too much variable that you can change, all the kind of models maybe are more helpful. And this is maybe what we can talk more with more knowledge and with more details. I think this is very interesting work. I guess it's very difficult to modernize. In fact, I would like to join this answer with another question to him. How do you think the sensibility of the model should be, I guess, should be very sensible to affecting a little sum of the variables that are inside the model should have, like, changes very dramatic in the output of the model? Is this something that you expected before the model that you are trying to calibrate in the future with laboratory test results? Or do you think that in some point it will be, like, a more difficult to control, the output? Well, if we take the old model, and we compare it with one place in the laboratory, it might be complicated. But when you keep some parameters constant and you make a variation of two ways that you are sensing the analysis, so to take some factor some way, you might see, you might validate the examples of the laboratory, and then add the other variables, which are maybe which were validated separately. And in terms of sensitivity, yes, you are right. We have seen that maybe temperature is, in some cases, I'll show you some graphs. You can see that maybe it might not seem very good, but this is the effect of the humidity. So the relative humidity, maybe if it is from 50 to 60, will not, or 75, maybe it will not affect a lot if it is higher there. I speak about the temperature at the humidity. If it's higher, maybe the joint cutting time will be much longer, and you can see that there is an exponentially increasing time. And maybe you can see the cooling time. This year you can see the interesting result of the cooling time, depending on the, maybe if you do the cooling in one day, and then one point back, one and a half day, or two days, you can see the curve. But before I, you may suppose that it should be just linear. Or in this case, this is, which was obvious, and we are expecting to have the chill-out or the shrinkage coefficient, which depends on the composition of the concrete and the amount of the thermal. This was expected to be done if we increase the shrinkage coefficient, which will be more shrinkage, and we should cut before and before. Is there any average numbers or just for that moment of the technology in the mutation? And the numbers? For instance, the humidity. Is it the annual average humidity? Or the... You can put humidity hour by hour. Even mean, like, humidity in days. Here, this constant humidity, we put the constant humidity. For example, this one, for the other set, this part, this part, this part, this part, this part, this part. So this mean just the humidity? Yes, but the model is allowing you to change any part of the humidity. I think you just took apart this. Yes, sure. The humidity we're talking about is not the ambient humidity, it's the moisture content of the concrete. No, here I'm speaking of the relative humidity. Here you are. I'm okay. Sorry, that's really good. So you're talking about the relative humidity surrounding the concrete. Exactly. Oh, sorry. Concerning the model, it's usually, for example, let's discuss again the relative humidity. Usually, does this model allow you, for example, to put the relative humidity as a variable? Yes. Yes, it might change during the time, minute, by minute, or second by second, or hour by hour. Okay. You have to choose the time steps and it will change. Because if not, it's going to be relative humidity. The same temperature. Okay, so maybe that's enough of a break from your vacation. Thank you very much on behalf of all of us here in the college. Like I said, it gives us a lot of pride to see one of our graduates now kind of exploring in what five years ago was a very new direction for you in many ways, although maybe founded upon some of the fundamental analytical tools, some of which overlap well with your curriculum here, and it's interesting. These are challenging problems and they have a big theoretical base, as well as lots of practical applications.