 As Gerald Beer points out, Jankiewicz cites disinformation in domestic politics even though DHS said outright that the governance board was specifically focused on foreign disinformation from Russia and from human traffickers regarding border migration. Nina was triggered and decided to respond, but that only dug her hole even deeper. The thread you're citing, which you've removed the initial context to, is in reference to a paper about hostile state disinfo. You can disagree with my assessment that it affects domestic politics, but the strategy described in the paper is the work I'm referring to. It's false. I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what context means. Speaking of something being entrenched in domestic politics necessarily means combating domestic sources of disinformation, which is now what you were hired to do. Not to mention that by disabling replies to your tweets, you are preventing people from introducing any context that might show you are wrong or otherwise refute your claims. So please, don't lecture me on the best practices of informational discourse, Nina.