 It's 0.6%, which means that more than 85% of the potential maximum is produced. And with regards to the factors of excludability, I analyzed three of them. The first one is digital divide. In 2022, the average share of internet users was slightly above 50% in global south. Whereas in the global north, it was almost 90%. Which speaks about a large and drastic difference. Then another source of excludability is the net neutrality versus zero rating paradigm. For example, there are a lot of authors arguing that zero rating has positive economic effects for consumers, which means that more consumers could consume the free knowledge. And there was a very nice project by the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia Zero, which was an attempt to reduce excludability across countries. And the main criticism of this project was that it was not net neutral. It was against the principle of net neutrality. And at the end, we have the censorship. This is a case in which governments deliberately sees access to the Wikimedia projects. So that people prevented to access the free knowledge. This can be done by blocking content. And by prosecuting editors. And there have also been some examples of some traces of censorship in developed countries, in democratic countries, like the UK, Australia, France, and Germany.