 Wow, this is a wild one, folks. During a congressional hearing on government censorship, Democrats actually tried to censor one of the invited witnesses, RFK Jr., using their usual go-to excuse that he's a racist conspiracy theorist. I'd like to raise a point of order. Kind of a lady, a standard point of order. Point of order. Pursuant to House Rule 11, Clause 2, which Mr. Kennedy is violative of, I move that we move into an executive session because Mr. Kennedy has repeatedly made despicable anti-Semitic and anti-Asian comments as reasonably as last week. Rule 11, Clause 2 says, whenever it is asserted by a member of the committee that the evidence or testimony at a hearing may tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate any person or it is asserted by a witness that the evidence or testimony that the witness would give at a hearing may tend to defame, degrade, or incriminate the witness, and it goes on. Mr. Kennedy, among many other things, has said, I know a lot now about bio weapons. We put out hundreds of millions of dollars into ethnically targeted microbes. The Chinese have done the same thing. In fact, COVID-19, there is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately. The races that are most immune to COVID-19 are- A lady making a motion or a speech. I've made a motion to move into an executive session because Mr. Kennedy's testimony and his previous statements- Mr. Chairman, I move to table the motion. The gentleman from Kentucky has moved to table. The question is on the motion. The question is on the motion. Can I ask for a roll call vote on the motion to table? Let me ask the question. The question is on the motion to table. The gentlelady has asked for a roll call vote. The clerk will have to step back for a second. The clerk will have to come in. We'll call the roll on the motion to table, and then we can get back to testimony. I think the witnesses can sit in the chair sitting behind me. I'll leave that up to the clerks. If the clerks are comfortable with that, why don't we do that? Maybe we can go right down here. Mr. Chairman, point of order. The gentleman from Louisiana. Is it the custom of this committee to censor viewpoints that we disagree with from witnesses? Mr. Chairman, I have a motion to have a motion on the table. There's a motion and the vote's been called. Move into the executive session. We're waiting for the clerks. Is violative of rule 11 clause 2. Waiting for the clerks. Clerk will call the roll. Mr. Jordan. Yes. Mr. Jordan votes yes. Mr. Issa. Mr. Massey. Yes. To not censor. Mr. Massey votes yes. Mr. Stuart. Yes. Mr. Stuart votes yes. Mrs. Staphonic? Yes. Mr. Staphonic votes yes. Mr. Gates? Mr. Johnson of Louisiana? Yes. Mr. Johnson of Louisiana votes yes. Mr. Armstrong? Yes. Mr. Armstrong votes yes. Mr. Subie? Mr. Bishop? Yes. Mr. Bishop votes yes. Ms. Camack. Yes. Ms. Camack votes yes. Ms. Hagemon? Yes. Ms. Hagemon votes yes. I want to follow the rules that the Republicans made at the beginning of this conference with these House rules, so no. Ms. Pascott votes no. Mr. Lynch? No. Mr. Lynch votes no. Ms. Sanchez? No, because it's violative of the rules. Ms. Sanchez votes no. Ms. Wasserman-Schultz? No, to allowing a witness to degrade and suspend others and violate the rules and not have his testimony and degradation amplified rather than given an executive session. Ms. Wasserman-Schultz votes no. Mr. Connolly? No, to the Soviet Politburo. Mr. Connolly votes no. Mr. Garamendi? No. Mr. Garamendi votes no. Mr. Allred? Ms. Garcia? No. Ms. Garcia votes no. Mr. Goldman? No, to hate speech. Mr. Goldman votes no. Jeez. Mr. Gates? Yes. Mr. Gates? Aye. Mr. Gates votes aye. Clerk will report. Mr. Chairman, there are 10 ayes and 8 noes. The motion to table is agreed to. One.