 All right, so we are now going to transition to S184 and actually relating to defensive others and justifiable on the side. And we'll start with Rebecca Turner. Good morning. Good morning, Madam Chair. Good morning committee. For the record, Rebecca Turner from the office of the Defender General here to weigh in and indicate our support for S184. We see this bill as providing a critical update to our current statute to cover more than just simply the defense of family members, but to expand that to include the defense of others. We see this as consistent with some of the most fundamental laws of nature. And that is to intervene when we see others who are being attacked and unable to defend themselves. And we also see this as consistent, while modernizing our statute consistent with the majority of states in the United States who have already done so again to expand this coverage beyond family members. And so I don't have much more to say about this bill and if there are any questions, I'm happy to take them now. Otherwise, I know you have a busy calendar today. Thank you, appreciate your testimony. Any questions? Good, thank you. Thank you. Yeah. Take care. Mindy Wooster, please, the Department of Public Safety. Good morning. Good morning. My name is Mindy Wooster. I'm the Executive Director of Policy Development for the Department of Public Safety. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to speak today. My testimony will be very brief. I'm here just to express support for the Department of Public Safety for the current language as drafted in S184. Thank you. That may be a record. We're setting some records today. Okay. Just so, you know, so, because I'm sure a lot of work and testimony went into getting this legislation to the place it's at with our colleagues in the Senate. But I'm wondering if you could just say a little more about DPS's support for the language and I mean, does the Department feel this is an improvement on current line? And if so, why? Just so we can share that with our colleagues in the House to better understand. Certainly. My understanding is that this was an unintended change when doing the use of force policy. And then the language is simply being corrected to follow the intent to include others for defense. And since that was the intent, that's why we express support for it, simply changing it to what the intent was. Thanks for just putting that on the record. I appreciate it. Absolutely. Okay. Thank you. All right. Thank you very much. Well, I'm as shocked as everybody else, but okay. Really shocked, but okay. It's Judge Zonay here. Oh, yeah. Yes, okay. Because we've never had so many agreeable things. Let's see. Okay, so, actually the judge is coming for the next bill. I know we are. We're gonna schedule. Okay.