 yna'r gwaith ar y cyfnod ymlaen. Yn ymlaen, yna Llan south o Codwm Llan, ac mae'n Chris Crisione a Tim Chilvers yn ymdweud. Yn ymdweud, Chris. Fy enw'r fawr, ddweud ymdweud, ymdweud, ymdweud. Yn ymdweud, mae'n fawr. Yn ymdweud, Chris Crisione. Yn ymdweud ymdweud ymdweud ymdweud ymdweud. A rwy'n gweithio'n gweithio'r gweithio'r gweithio'r Gweithio'r Tim Chilvers gan y bydd per macaronu llan nesaf. Dyna'r amlynedd ac er ôl i eich fulio iawn i chi Hyrwyr Cywr醬ais hynna'rifer y gall fod yn ei wycheth y Llan south o Codwm Llan. Roedd fy hun hynod eich lastiadau cyntaf, a bobl gwneud foundations iwer ym Uni朝 a oedd rhaid ei hynny addysg Abertaol. Rhaid, ymddw'n enthyg iawn, ond dyfnydd yn digwydd Shirell, a chael y bydd yn gweithio. Rwy'n defnyddio i'r cyd-gwysig i'r cyd-gwysig, mae'n nhw'n gweithio. Tim wediなるほど bryd y gwirionedd a clywed o'r pethau mewn cyd-gwysig, wedi bod yn ffysg y cyd-gwysig i'r cyd-gwysig i'r llyfrnedd y Llyfrgellau. Mae'n dweud i gyda'r cyd-gwysig i'r cyd-gwysig i'r cyd-gwysig, a ydych chi'n gweld â'i ffordd oherwydd mae'n golygu gyda'r cyd-gwysig can ni allu cyd ros i. Os mai fyddwn Parsel yn gyd curfodoli? Yn agilydd beth ydym isbê arall, wedi cael nodi. Rydyn ni'n credu онerbwyntol fag voldaeth y na escawdd перgylsigol sgrin. Yn wedi'i o центр I guaranteeiem ddechrau siarad yma yn y dedarb Silbysbysysaidd CymruOOP. but the A is quite obvious in any case. That is for appropriate commercial uses set out in that policy. Area B for elements about the recreation and ecological mitigation. And then within our control we have what's known as area C or as many people will know the lakes and so that's down here it's just the two lakes with obviously the TA lake above that that's out of our control. And so plans are for wider generation. I'll move on to the next slide and so it's no secret that we've been at this for a while. And it's been a thoroughly detailed process, many iterations of proposals from mixed use to what we see here on site or here in the proposals now. The good thing that's come out of that slightly sort of protracted process is the sheer volume of engagement that we've had with local residents. And so now we feel that this scheme is in a place that reflects their wants and desires out of such an asset really on the lakes for the most part, but also what they want to see on area A and B. And so that that is, you know, a sort of run for of where we have been. We've had free public consultations over the years that I've most certainly been part of, and every time we've had a great deal of interaction with local residents. And so that has led to what we currently see. So I'm not sure what the noise is now, but handily, I'll pass on to Tim to run over the vision for the land south of Coulthamside. Great. Thanks, Chris. Yeah, if you want to pop down the slide to the next one, that'd be great. Thank you. And yeah, good evening everyone. As Chris has said, the context behind this, these sort of three parcels of which we own is the local plan, the 2018 local plan, so it's up to date. And it sets a very clear framework for the council's expectations are in terms of the development and type of uses that need to come forward and the interaction between these parcels as well because it's an area that is quite naturally severed with the rail line and various uses. So there's really an emphasis on making this as linked as it can be. So parcel a there you can see, we can run through the other slides but parcel a is now coming forward. We're putting it forward for a commercial use. Historically, we had proffered and looked to come forward with more of a mixed use offering. Obviously, the desire was to see a commercial only scheme and that's what we are looking to do. Parcel B then will be used wholly for ecological ecology mitigation, bearing in mind the various designations of the land in the area and the fact that we need to offset biodiversity requirements. And the lakes, you know, clearly there's, there's a long history of the lakes and problems associated with what could be a really, really good asset for the local community. We're as keen as anyone to get this sorted for the long term, and to make these a real usable place that residents can enjoy. And so the scheme would undertake, you know, quite a significant programme of improvements to the lakes and make them safe and accessible and we will open those up so that members of the public can make use of them, as I say in a safe way. So we just run through the next slide, of course that will give people a slightly more zoomed in prospect of what we're looking at. So parcel A, which is that L shaped area, which obviously has the tins running through the middle. There'll be a commercial uses on both elements of the land there with a grade separated crossing so that there's no conflict between pedestrians and cyclists and any kind of vehicular movements. This, this area we would be applying for an outline so what you see there is purely illustrative as a to give a flavour of what could come forward. But really, you know the details of some something that come forward as part of reserve matters. On to the next slide please Chris. Parcel B, as I said earlier, we're really looking to do a light touch proposal here of biodiversity mitigation. So really not a huge amount of change to what's currently in situ on the site, but there will be enhancements to habitats predominately for invertebrate species. And then the most exciting element of the scheme from our perspective and and no doubt from the communities as well is the lakes. And so this would be a part of the site we apply for in detail so that there's no kind of time lag or delay between, you know what we're putting forward, hopefully obtaining a permission that's implementable. We can bring forward the works that are required to bring the lakes forward. And, and really for these lakes we are. We're not looking to over engineer anything at this stage and we don't want to kind of preempt what the community might want to bring forward. You know in the years ahead here, because the way we see is this is a local asset for informal recreation and use only we don't want it to be. And nor do I think the community really want it to be a major draw or kind of traffic generator or anything like that because there are other country parks in the vicinity of this site which fulfill that role and don't have the physical constraints at this particular parcel of land does. And that there you can see, for example, just a zoom in of some of the plans that are emerging just to show that these are detailed plans. As I said earlier, not over engineers are very much timber natural materials, nothing intrusive or urban and look and feel. And I just just two images which show what the what the current condition of the lakes are in and really we just got to build on what's there because they really are incredible on site at the moment aside from the Angling Club and certain permits for birdwatching and the like. It's closed off to people and that's that's a sad state of affairs. It makes it right for trespass and you know the sooner we can resolve this I think the better really. Next steps very quickly are we've we've put in for an EIA scoping opinion, just to make sure that the technical evidence based upon which we're basing our plans is is robust and and satisfactory. You explain EIA please. Of course can environmental impact assessment. So procedure you go through for major applications where there's, you know, more severe potential environmental impacts than a normal application of a normal scale. So you just have to go into more detail in assessing traffic and quality noise, those kind of considerations. The planning application itself we've been we've been working closely with the with the city council and the highways authority also through pre app and we will be looking to submit the application. Next month and obviously that builds on many many years of consultation and engagement with the public to shape where we've got to. That public engagement will obviously continue and it will continue through throughout the course of the determination and they'll be engagement in relation to the lakes which obviously we've got to manage and we're very sensitive to in the months ahead and as the and as the weather warms up but that last bullet point there I think it is absolutely crucial from from our perspective is, you know, in bringing forward a for that local plan commercial development. What that will enable us to do is the early and upfront delivery and improvements of the lakes. And that that is key, I think. There was Councillor Daunton a question submitted in advance that related to trespass on the lakes and Tim's touched on that. And I think in early and upfront delivery of that parcel. And really the focus is on sort of early prevention clearly in summer is upon us thick and fast. And so we will take the necessary steps to manage that and I can go into detail and in the question time. And in effect the way we see the solution to the, the trespass to the antisocial behavior and so on is through opening up lakes and so that's our sort of central mission and aim at this point in time. The last slide is just to say, you know, we'd be happy to take questions. If you do want more detailed. If you have any descriptions on the proposals, please do visit our website, because that will effectively go through what we've just presented but also some more information on top of that. And our contact details are also on there as well so we're more than happy to take questions via email. Thank you, Tim. And thank you, Chris. And just before we go to the questions in the chat, there was another question sent in in advance. Would Anderson's please stop referring to the lakes as Burnside Lakes. A possible name might be for example Cherry Hinton Lakes so that's something for you to. I mean, so we've, we've, we've been having this, this conversation for years and our central sort of focus when we sort of labelled it Burnside Lakes way back when and was to make sure that people weren't calling it the Romsey beach because that was attracting hundreds of visitors on weekends in the summer. We were moaned at for calling it Cambridge Lakes we were moaned at for calling it Cherry Hinton Lakes, all for various different reasons and we so we settled on Burnside. However, moving forward, we are speaking with local representatives, as well as residents about what they want to call the lakes as they come forward to become the urban country park and I think that that should be where our sort of efforts are on making sure that what it's called in this area is something that's reflective of local opinion. We're certainly live to the issue of associated with the Burnside reference so so that's that's eminently sensible and we'll make sure that's taken into account. Okay thank you. And so if you could take your presentation down now we'll go on to the questions and Chris Chris Carter, and if I could take the first question first. Yes please. Yep. So, Ruth, it's Claire Daunton here and it's Daunton D-A-U-N-T-O-N, not Dawson. And if we can have another meeting in the near future well I should just explain that because of COVID we missed two meetings last year. And so we do realise that we've got a lot to get through in this session and we normally meet every three to four months and we will now be getting back to that schedule. As I mentioned at the beginning, alternating between city leading and south cams leading. So we should be meeting more often than we have done in the recent past. Over to you now Chris Chris Carter. Thank you. Yes. Further point from Ruth. The future of the lakes should be tied up with the future of Snakey Path and of the Brook. I've suggested in the past that the path needs to be remodelled with perhaps additional land taken from the school to permit a widening what options are currently in play. I believe the city and county councils are taking forward proposals to remodel and look at Snakey Path and some widening there. We've had discussions with them on that and I understand that they've got monies set aside and they're looking at initiatives to do exactly that. Obviously it's land that we don't control. I think there's every chance that we may be asked to make some kind of offsite mitigation contribution to it. I think that's open for discussion. We certainly wouldn't say no if it was reasonable and put to us. Thank you. In addition to that, we've had meetings before with the friends of the Cherry Hinton Brook, very conscious of their opinions on that part of the area. For us, I think that the proposals we see to date do respect the Cherry Hinton Brook and the special nature of it, but also in creating that cycle and pedestrian access at the northern part of the lakes parcel. That will effectively take away a pinch point and a sort of one central access that we see at the moment. In that respect, I'd argue that the proposals are reflective of those discussions. There was a question sent in by David Brooks on the improvement to Snakey Path and I think if you've not covered that in your answer, you'll be taking that up later on, I think, from the written question. Thank you. Yes, the next question. What is the current situation with the methane from the old refuse tip? Yes, so we've got, you know, an incredibly extensive amount of monitoring going on and it has been going on for many, many years now. So, you know, the gas report will form part of the very detailed geo environmental report and monitoring for form part of the application. It's not actually gassing much at all anymore, just due to its age so actually it's really, you know, very, very settled and you know gas mitigation measures will be put in place as a matter of course, both during any construction and obviously post construction as well. But in terms of actually what's happening in the ground at the moment, nothing from the monitoring is indicating anything of particular concern. Thank you. The next question is, are you able to comment on where the access points will be for the lakes, vehicles and people? Yeah, yeah, I mean I alluded to it in my last answer but we've tried to shift the emphasis to access from the tins that's the most actively used area or sorry cycle network. And so we want to allow ready access from that area. The car park that exists at the end of Burnside that will still remain but purely for use by the private fishing club and obviously access for those who need to maintain the lakes going forward. So that will be the only vehicular access to site. Okay, thank you. The remaining comments relate to the name and I think we've covered that already so chair that's the end of the questions as I see them. Thank you. And we had one written question sent in advance from Claire Castle, and if Claire is here in the meeting, I think colleagues from the Greater Cambridge Partnership Transport will take that question and get in touch with you get back to you about that. Thank you, Chris.