 Yesterday, President Trump released an unprecedentedly detailed plan on how to address the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both the content and context have provoked diverse reactions and raised many questions about whether this plan has the potential to bring the parties closer to peace. This is the latest. I'm Lucy Kodza-Elepo. Was there anything new and surprising in this plan? I think the plan took some people by surprise in the sense that it did nod towards a two-state framework. This is something that had not necessarily been taken for granted. It was a plan that is weighted very heavily in favor of one side, specifically the Israelis. And not only is that the case in the substance, but what was laid out yesterday suggests that the Israelis are able to start immediately implementing the vision and moving towards what they are promised by the plan. At the same time, the Palestinians will be given four years to meet certain preconditions in order to move towards what is promised them at the end of the process. What are the positions of Israelis and Palestinians on the plan? Well, as mentioned, the plan does lean very heavily in favor of Israeli positions. It provides Israel the ability to maintain sovereignty over all these settlements that currently exist, the Jewish settlements that exist in the West Bank. And not only that, it actually gives Israel the ability to annex those territories immediately and start implementing on that final vision. It also has given Israel full control over an undivided Jerusalem as its capital and given Israel full security control throughout the West Bank. What that means for the Palestinians, of course, is that there is less for them to gain in terms of territory in a future Palestinian state. At the end of a four-year process, if the Palestinians meet certain conditions to include a demilitarized Gaza, ending support for terrorism, implementing various governance reforms, at the end of that process, they could be looking at a state that really is land that circles around these areas of Jewish settlement that have now been officially recognized as being part of the state of Israel. This is safe for the Palestinians. They did not see this plan as favorable towards their interests. At the same time, on the Palestinian street, on some level, what you're seeing is a little bit of a shrug for some Palestinians who are saying this has really been the de facto reality for a while, so this doesn't necessarily change anything about our daily reality. What about the international community response? So this is an important question. Typically, when we say international community in this context, we're talking about those actors who've been working with the U.S. alongside the U.S. over the past number of years, trying to bring about to mediate a negotiated solution between the Israelis and Palestinians. Their responses have varied. You've seen a spectrum of tepid support for the U.S. effort to put something forward and bring about a new initiative. You've seen a reaffirmation of long-standing positions. And we've seen affirmative urging by the parties, by the international community, that both parties Israelis and Palestinians see this plan as an opportunity to come to the table and negotiate. So we're going to be watching over the next weeks and months to see how much capital any of these states want to place into pushing the parties towards that goal and working with the U.S. to try to make this plan something that has legs as a diplomatic tool for sparing progress on this conflict.