 theory of rural and urban society. Ibn Khaldun has a very interesting debate that is regarding the rural and urban society because he believed that human society differs from animal society because humans are endured with wisdom and human beings need a leader to look after their well-being and guide them through difficult situations. The philosophy of Ibn Khaldun is that there must be a leader because no society can deny any society's needs because it gives the same agenda and framework that makes society proceed. So human beings always search the means of livelihood because humans need their lives to find the means of livelihood. So they live together, coordinate and cooperate which lead towards the creation of straight. However, mentioned traits like in animals, Ibn Khaldun has described two types of societies in his book Badvi society and the Hazri society. According to his theory, Badvi is a rural society whereas Hazri is the urban society because individuals living in Badvi society are united and have strong force of aspia. Now in Badvi society, why is the feeling of aspia strong? Because the rural society will have smaller groups. The number of people there will be less and they have robust physical structure, live and deserts where satisfying basic needs are quite difficult. Now in the Badvi society, there are problems for people because they are limited in number and their resources will be less. It will be difficult for them to generate their resources but they have to struggle hard for their survival therefore they are physically strong. However, Ibn Khaldun has described a very important characteristic of Badvi society. Because there are less resources, there are more struggles, so people physically will be very strong and they will have a lot of importance in this sense that Ibn Khaldun, whenever an individual makes an effort for himself, then there is a physical strength and a spirit behind that individual's effort. But in comparison with the Badvi society, his perspective is that the asri society, they are similar to those people who live in urban societies. We can say even nowadays we are also seeing this difference too because they have a major portion of resources, so their physical strength will be less because when there are more resources, there will be less physical effort after less effort, so they will have a lot of opportunities to survive. So their physical strength will be less but in comparison with Badvi society, asri society enjoys more resources. But what will be the problem in asri society? That they cannot defend themselves against external aggression and individuals of Badvi society are dependent on state security and they are not physically strong for the reason that the basic needs of life are easily available to them. Now the asri society, because they have less physical exertion and they have to work harder for their hard work, so that is why their physical strength is compared to the rural society. The urban society has made a comparison of physical strength but they think that the rural society will be more physically strong but the urban society will be weaker physically. On the other hand, there are limited resources, they have more effort and resources in urban societies, but their dependence on the state is more because compared to the rural society, the interaction between the urban society with the state is more and the relationship between the state and the urban population is deeper according to ibn Khaldun and we can say that the differences in the rural urban population are the same.