 While there's a focus on big tech platforms, there are thousands of platforms and new ones emerging all the time that benefit from the protections afforded by Section 230. While it is true that these large platforms do have too much power, it's not because of Section 230. It's because of other issues in the market, such as network effects, mark consolidations, and other forms of power that confer on these largest platforms market power or gatekeeper status. So when a user's content is taken down by one of these platforms, it feels like they've been silenced because it doesn't feel like a person can go elsewhere and actually be heard. This fact points to the power of these platforms. To address market power like this, we need to think of solutions that can make certain consumers have more choices and can easily switch between those choices. That points to a need to foster a more competitive marketplace, which public knowledge is working to bring about. We ultimately need stronger competition policy to diminish the power of these companies. With more competition, platforms will feel pressure to do more and better moderating of misinformation and harassing content since people will be more willing to leave if they are unsatisfied.