 Along with the plans. This is a view from the future park across the street. The, the orange structure is cost of Roseland. Next slide, please. Here's a partial east elevation at the lobby entry. Next slide, please. Here's a partial south elevation. Feel and uphold the zoning administrator's action by approving the cost of Roseland project design review. Next slide, please. This is my contact information. If anybody has any questions, feel free to email or call my direct work number. We have city staff and Andrew triple supervising senior available to also address along with myself to address any questions you might have of staff. The applicant and appellant are also present. Thank you for that. I like to bring it back to council for any questions. Seeing none. I like to call those up. Councilman Alvarez. Thank you very much. You call me before I let the scene. Good afternoon. How are you? My question to you would be, has there been any negotiation or attempts to purchase the property in the past? And if so, has there been a result or what result came of it? Apparently there wasn't right. Thank you, Mr. Councilmember Alvarez. I'll defer to the applicant to answer that question. Thank you. Thanks. The applicant in zoom, please raise their hand or are you purchased? Thank you there participated in council chamber. Can you hear me? Great. I'm Ali Gaylord, director of housing development for mid pens North Bay office where the applicant for this project and mid pen is not an owner of the land at the moment. It's owned by the. The Sonoma County Community Development Commission, and I believe there had been some conversations about purchasing additional property by the CDC, but that's not something that mid pen has been involved in. Thank you so much. Does that conclude the questions from the council? All right. Seeing no more questions at this time. I like to call the zoning administrator. Christina, I don't see Andy on the line. Is there someone? Oh, sorry. This man is Amy Nicholson served as acting zoning administrator. Since Andy was the original planner on for the Rosen village. She stepped in as acting zoning administrator and she has her hand raised. She's just been promoted to panelist. One moment. Good evening vice mayor Rogers and members of the council. My name is Amy Nicholson. I'm a senior planner with the planning and economic development department. And as miss to means just mentioned, I was acting as the zoning administrator. During the June 1st special meeting when Casa Rosalind received approval for minor design review. Both miss to means and the applicant provided a presentation during this meeting. And then we did open up the public hearing portion of the item where members of the public were able to provide comments. During this period, the appellant did provide his public comments regarding the easement being discussed this evening. And staff did provide answers or a response to those public comments. Including that the land used approvals, including the site development pattern were previously approved by both the commission and the council in 2019. And I also responded that design review was focusing on the architecture and the landscaping for this affordable housing project. During that meeting I was able to make each of the findings required for design review. And so that is why the project was approved at that time. And I'm happy to answer any questions. Thanks. Councilor, are there any questions? Thank you so much. Seeing none, I would like to call the applicant for presentation of 10 to 15 minutes. Everybody hear me? Yes, we can. Thank you. Good evening all. My name is Devon Erie. I am the project manager for Casa Rosalind and the Tierra de Rosas master plan. I want to start by saying thank you to Vice Mayor Rogers, the city council members and city planning staff for all your work on this important project. Next slide please. Midpen housing is a nonprofit affordable housing developer with over 50 years experience in the Bay Area. We've developed a rehabilitated over 8000 homes for low income families, seniors and special needs individuals across over 120 affordable housing communities. Midpen maintains its own property management services and strives to ensure that every community we manage benefits both our residents as well as the surrounding neighborhood. Our resident services team delivers on site programs, education and services to midpen residents of all ages as well. Next slide please. Casa Rosalind is part of the larger master development known as Tierra de Rosas and will provide 75 affordable apartment homes in the Rosalind neighborhood and will address the shortage of high quality affordable housing in Sonoma County. The units are designed to accommodate families with over two thirds of the units designed as two or three bedrooms. The units will be leased to individuals and families with income levels ranging from 30% to 60% of the area median income. Next slide please and I'll turn it over to our project architect to describe the design. Thank you very much City Council. My name is Rick Williams with Van Meter Williams Pollock. Excuse me could you raise the podium a little bit? We can't hear you and the recording won't come through correctly. Thank you. Yes and if you could speak closer to the microphone that would be great. Thank you. My name is Rick Williams. I'm with Van Meter Williams Pollock. We are the architects for Casa Rosalind for midpen. We have been working on the design of the building since the master plan has been approved and it is the L shaped building on the upper left hand corner of this site plan. Next please. The design of the master plan has gone through some preliminary refinements based on meetings with the community and discussions of the design review board that were discussed previously. Some of the refinements included making sure that the style of the building fit in with the overall complex but added multiple varieties, colors and other treatments were added as well. Next please. And we wanted to maintain some key aspects of the master plan design which we'll show you as we proceed through the presentation. Next please. As with noted color and building patterns and materials were discussed during the master plan and a colorful palette was prescribed and discussed with the community early on in the master plan process and we took that to heart during the design portion of the project as well. Thank you. Next please. In doing this we added we developed a series of different color palettes and material selections highlight accenting specific areas of the design including the balcony railings the metal railings of the design to bring various color opportunities to the building and discuss those with the community. And in doing so we had multiple community meetings where we discussed the different alternative color palettes and the design. There was a movie night where you had the opportunity that people on site during an evening a movie watching had the opportunity to discuss the color opportunities of the project. There were material boards at the library where visitors could submit their comments and recommendations on the colors and we also had a live online survey of the various color opportunities and and detail opportunities for the development. Next please. We did get some wholehearted support consistent throughout all the different avenues of gathering community support community preferences on this was really pretty clear that the strong bold reddish corner material with the various highlights that are illustrated here were the preferred color palette for the building. And so we have proceeded with that as part of the design review package. Next please. And the railing also while we had many different patterns and material colors was really this was the preferred outcome by most individuals to really have a more organic shape which really contrasts well with the geometries of the building. So we were very happy with the community input and have developed the design using that color palette and detailing. Next please. The site plan the building plan itself and the site plan did not change substantially from the master plan. There are a few minor variations on the interior spaces. The parking including the shared parking highlighted in yellow there remain the same just slightly different layout but essentially the same number of parking spaces. And there were we also looked at moving a community building community space to the backside of the building to allow for a relationship with the open space. Next please. This was presented showing how the purple colored common rooms were open to a private open space for young children so that they could spill in and out from part of their after school programs to the play areas. And that was one of the only refinements in the building space planning that was done in the further development of the design. Next please. The open space was presented. It has opportunities for a variety of age of children as well as gathering spaces for the adults of barbecue area and seating area so people can keep an eye on their kids as they're playing as well. So we felt that it was a win-win situation on the overall design of the open space and it was presented to the community at various times and they appreciated the design of the open space for the kids and the orientation to the children. Next please. Some of the other elements that were brought into the open space are illustrated here. Next please. As mentioned before the overall design of the building, the design committee mentioned having more of a contemporary style while maintaining some traditional elements to the development and we took that to heart with both the window design and some of the forms of the building particularly at the corner. Next please. And you can see how the building refined itself over time. Here were the original master plan drawings which show the trellis arcade on the ground in a highlighted corner element and then a recessed entry. Next please. And here you can see how we still have a highlighted corner with a different style or form and then you can still see the recessed entry where we added color and a playful accent and the arcaded trellis area along the ground floor is still maintained as part of the overall aesthetic of the building. Next please. Looking at A Street and how an arcade or trellis was continued in the master plan form before it transitioned to residential. Next please. We showed this design element which has the same corner and the trellis wrapped around rather than having the arcade we continued the trellis wrapped around and because we moved a little bit of the community space to the play area we added a few residential units along the street so that A Street has a little bit more of a residential character along it. Next please. Mr. Williams I'm going to have to ask you to lean closer to the microphone we can't hear you on the recording. So this is the image of the residential walk and it shows the entry porches along it making an active frontage with families that spill out to their front porches along the street. Next please. And this is the final design slide. It shows a view from the park. This really anchors the open space for the community and really presents the overall vision for Casa Roseland and the overall master plan. And I am going to allow Devin to close. Thank you. You have four minutes remaining of the 15 minute allotment. I'm sorry can you say that one more time. Four minutes remaining. Thank you. Next slide please. So as Rick mentioned, Midpen implemented a robust community engagement process between 2016 and 2018 including four community meetings and three design workshops with over 260 community members participating. Midpen has continued our outreach efforts in the Roseland community. We recently hosted two additional drive-in movie nights free of charge at the site in May and June of this year with over 230 people in attendance. Prior to the feature film we screened an informational video providing updates on the project's progress and next steps. We've also been distributing surveys to Roseland residents where they can select their preferences for design elements in the public Plaza and street names for the new streets that will be created as part of the Tierra de Rosas master plan. Next slide please. The final plans and community benefits included in the Tierra de Rosas master plan came out of the feedback we received from the community. These benefits include a mix of homes by affordability and size, a multi-use civic building, a vibrant public Plaza and opportunities for local small businesses. The project is also bringing $35 million in state funding for transit improvements into Roseland. These improvements include Joe Rodota trail linkages, new sidewalks and bike paths and widening Sebastopol road to create safer routes for pedestrians near the site. Headways on city bus local route 15 will be reduced from 60 minutes to 30 minutes on weekdays and a new electric bus will be purchased to service this route. Mid-pan and our partners continue to make progress towards our goal of completing the Tierra de Rosas master plan as an equitable and inclusive development as approved by the city council. The public infrastructure improvements are close to receiving city approval and will hopefully break ground and be completed in 2022. Matote food park is breaking ground this summer and will feature local food trucks, vendors and small businesses. Design approval for Casa Roseland would bring the project one step closer to breaking ground and delivering much needed affordable housing to the Roseland community. So that concludes our presentation, but we would like to briefly address the appeal as well. Mid-pan housing designed the master plan in response to the existing easement identified in the appeal and the design ensures access to the neighboring parcel is maintained. The plans are completely in compliance with access and parking as required by the easement. Further, the design review currently being considered by the city of Santa Rosa does not involve or impact the parking that is the subject of the lawsuit that is currently ongoing. Additionally, the trial court in that pending lawsuit has issued a tentative ruling in favor of the CDC and mid-pan stating that the CDC project would not frustrate the purpose for which the easement which is the subject of the ongoing lawsuit. And that the allocation of parking in connection with the CDC project satisfies the inferred intent of the easement that is the subject of the ongoing lawsuit. Under the circumstances, there's no reason the city of Santa Rosa should delay approval of the design review of the mid-pan affordable housing project because of the ongoing lawsuit. Thank you very much. Thank you. Council, do you have any questions of the applicant? Seeing none, I would like to welcome the appellant for their presentation and you have 10 to 15 minutes to present. I am working on promoting Mr. Paulson to a panelist. Looks like he's just rejoining the meeting on the panelist side. Mr. Paulson, you are welcome to turn on your camera or unmute yourself for your 15-minute presentation. Can you hear me? Yes. Thank you very much. Can you see me? No, I cannot. Do you want to see me? I can't figure out how to do this. I'm sorry. That one? Okay. I guess, well, you're just going to have to hear me then. I'm John Paulson. I am the appellant for this project. And as Christina, I'm sorry about butchering your name, as mentioned, it is all about the easement. And I'm unaware of the judge's decision. I haven't heard that officially, but tentative decision. But this is a recorded easement that started in 1956 between my father and Hugh Cotting. And so there were two separate owners of the shopping center. And if there's two separate owners, each one has to protect themselves from the other. My father sold Hugh Cotting the 6.9 acres at a 66% discount relying on Hugh Cotting to bring in an anchor tenant, pave the parking lot and provide 272 parking spaces. It was a consideration. On the other hand, Hugh wanted my father not to do something that would affect the shopping center and lowers value because he was going to spend a lot of money on it. So the CDC, this easement that's recorded goes with the property just because the city buys it does not mean that the easement can be discarded. It runs with the property. It's a circulation of parking easement. 272 parking spaces on the CDC side that will be destroyed by this total project that the own traffic study that was done by W. Manson, and it was prepared for the city of Santa Rosa states. And hopefully you've had a chance to look at it. That on peak times, there will be at least 30 car trips. And I'm sure there'll be more people looking for places to park on just the CDC project for just the CDC uses and where are they going to park? They're going to park on my side. And what's that going to do is, yeah, it's going to hurt me, but it's going to hurt my tennis a heck of a lot more because they rely on parking on not only my side, but the CDC side for their customers. I just want to say to the city council that I don't want to harm the Roseland community. On the contrary, I and my tennis have provided important services to the Roseland community, surviving and thriving, even though being attached at the hip to the neglected derelicted circus at the CDC property since 2011. My tenants who are all Hispanic continue to provide services to wrote the Roseland community. My tenants rely on ample parking for their customers. The parking on the CDC property, which is by recorded easement will be eliminated by not only this 75 unit affordable housing project. Contrary to what mid pen says, and additionally by the hundred market rate homes that are going to be put on the property. And then also the hundred market rate homes in the location on the map that you saw will eliminate if it goes through will eliminate the historical. Circulation for trucks and access to the back of my property delivered to Comacho market. There's next door to the CDC property. There's a church that relies on parking and helps it helps the Hispanic community with drug outreach. They rely on that property for parking. Comacho market has served a Roseland community with quality competitive price items. Comacho market is a full service grocery store that helps the Roseland community. El Patron fashion sells men's and women's fashion clothing to the hardworking Hispanic community, another Hispanic tenant of mine who rely on the parking. She was party supplies sells quality kinsen yet a party supplies back to small clothing and decorations for parties to that in the Hispanic community. Herbal life offers health food options for the Roseland community. Another tenant of mine Max Somali sells early morning food to hardworking Hispanics in the Roseland community on their way to work. Lamar Peckham is an attorney. He's an immigration attorney that provides services to all immigrant people looking to become US citizens pay taxes and be here without fear of deportation. Metro cell provides low cost phone service and phone bill paying services for walk in people and people at park at the Roseland shopping center. Monica's tax services files tax return for Spanish and English speaking residents of Roseland. El Favolito Mexican restaurant has provided affordable food to the Roseland community another Hispanic business that will all be heard by this mid pen project that ignores recorded easement. And not only recorded easement but historical prescriptive easements. During COVID I have accepted little to no rent from all my tenants and my rents have been fair to them. They've been good people and I've got some places I haven't got any rent just to keep them there and try and stay in business when they could open. All I've relied on is this dedicated parking easement that mid pen says unbelievable what they've said there. The 100 unit project in the back will eliminate the historical and recorded easement of circulation protract deliveries to the Comacho market. Yes, this project is going to affect me but it's going to hurt all these Latino people that have been there for many, many years. And that's why I'm opposing the 75 units, the Batota food court, the park, the 100 units of market rate homes and that's my appellate reason for doing this. Thank you. Thank you so much for your presentation. Council, do you have any questions? Seeing none. Oh, actually now I see one. Councilman Solier. Thank you Vice Mayor. This would be for the city attorney. Would this be the time to ask the question of the city attorney or is this only for the appellant? Right now is the time to ask questions for the appellant in their presentation. Okay, I have no questions for the appellant. Thank you. I couldn't get my face on there. Seeing no additional questions, I would like to give the applicant about five minutes to respond to the appellant's presentation if you wish to do so. And just a reminder, as you approach the microphone and council chamber to make a public comment or respond, please be sure to get close to the microphone so we can hear you in council chamber as well as for those participating via zoom and for perpetuity on the video recording. Thank you. And council, my name is Ali Gaylord, director of housing development for midpen housing, the applicant. The only response I would like to make is that the issue has been laid before you as a private issue between two parties. And I would ask that the council uphold the appeal and make the finding that the zoning administrator approved for this design review. Thank you. Thank you so much. At this time, I would like to open the public hearing. You do not need to fill out a card. Speakers will have three minutes to address the council. Madam host, if you'd like to make a public comment on item 15.1, the Casa Roseland appeal, please raise your hand via zoom. Again, if you're participating via council chamber, please approach the podium in an orderly fashion, maintaining social distance. Seeing no public comments from council chamber, I will move to zoom. The first public comment will be from Jen, followed by galaxy a 71 5G. Jen, I've enabled your speaking permissions. Please unmute your mic and proceed with your comment. Good afternoon. It's Jen Close, executive director of generation housing. Vice Mayor Rogers, council members, Mr. City manager, along with our community partners across sectors who signed on to our letter of support. Locienne, Santa Rosa Metro Chamber, First 5 Sonoma County, North Bay Leadership Council and Latino service providers. Generation housing urges you to deny the appeal before you and again voice your support for the Casa Roseland housing project. Not only does Casa Roseland provide 75 sorely needed additional affordable housing units, but the project is part of a master plan to significantly revitalize an old shopping center. It's transit friendly, climate friendly, close to schools, healthy food and health care resources. It's a development focused on providing homes for families, majority of its units, two and three bedroom homes. Jen H has robust endorsement evaluation and scoring rubric based on its guiding principles which value equity, environmentalism, collaboration and the in the broadest sense of our community members and community. This project was one of our highest scoring projects earning our most enthusiastic endorsement. We thank you in advance for showing your continued support for affordable housing development and always thank you for your service. The next public comment will be from Galaxy a 71 enabled your speaking permissions please unmute your mic and proceed with your comment. Hi, I'm representing Maxis tamales and we've been in business there for about eight years. We're a small family owned and operated business and if we lose these parking spots it's definitely going to affect our business we're probably going to go out of business and we were we're against this and we've been there for many years and I just want to express that. Thank you very much for your time. The next public comment will be from Amro. Followed by Hanna. I have enabled your speaking permissions. Amro please unmute your mic and proceed with your comment. Hello, good evening. I own the metro cell that Mr. Paulson mentioned earlier. I just want to share the same concerns that about parking and I'm afraid, you know, with the class of Roseland project that I'd lose parking spaces as well. And I've been there, you know, for several years and we already have some difficulty with parking there. And I can't imagine. Once this project's complete, you know, the troubles will have then. Or if it is. Thank you. Thank you. The next public comment will be from Pwana. When I have enabled your speaking permissions, please unmute your mic and proceed with your comment. Hello, hi, yes, I'm speaking on a part of one of Cortez from to party supplies. I am her 17 year old daughter. She has had this store here with john since while I was born so technically 17 years. In my point of view, we really need these like parking spaces because it makes like completely sense for our stores to have our people like come in and so it's easier for them like there's already so many traffic here like as it is with like those food trucks and like everything here pretty much and they're going to add houses and like like grass and stuff and I know like that makes it like a more beautiful community. But honestly, this is it's Rosalind and we also don't forget that we also have like a home like a lot of homeless here who will be here and will like hang around and then most of the people that will move here live here. You will have a lot of complaints about them because we already have it but we deal with them working and because we like ignore them we're like we're making our money like we're working here we're working hard for what we need. And if you're going to add more parking, then there's going to be traffic with the people in their houses and then if you take our away our parking, people from buying from us are going to park over there and then people are going to be like hey you're parking to my parking spot. There's going to be a lot of problems coming here and seeing me like as a like a young viewer seeing this. I feel like this is like, even in my opinion and in my mother's opinion who owns the store. We're not really a part like we don't want them to build this here because it will affect us in a really bad way especially because we've been working here a lot with everyone here beside us like we know like all the people that work here. Like, and it's really, it's going to it's just going to impact us a lot and I in my view, I just want this community here in Roseland to still get what they're buying from us and to come with like families. And families already like come here you guys they're they're made like a park by the trail. And as you can see that didn't even come out to be a good idea because, well they shut it down nobody, none of the kids come to play there. It's not very like, I don't know like I never went to that park either because I mean there's no point to it. And then they fixed up the corner and again you've left that corner just as it is and the homeless are there. I just see that in my opinion. And currently I'm pretty sure anybody who wants to appeal this. It's not really a good a good idea, but I'll stop talking for now but thank you for listening. Vice mayor I see no additional hands being raised via zoom and there are no public comments live from council chamber. Lastly, there were no public comments received via voice message. Thank you we will now close the public hearing. I'd like to bring it back to council. Councilman lawyer now would be a good time to ask. Madam city attorney. Thank you vice mayor and this. Madam city attorney this question has to do with our role this evening. Are we, and I did because they, there have been some compelling concerns voiced by the by the members of the commercial community there at this at this site. Is it my it is my understanding that we are limiting our comments and our decision to the design elements of this building are we not. That is correct council member. The project, the tentative map and the density bonus elements of the project kind of the bones of the broader project on the property was previously approved by the planning commission and was, and that approval was upheld by council back in 2019 and what's before you tonight is simply the design review so you're correct you're looking at the design elements of the building that could include the form massing materials. You can look at the site plan you can look at the landscape design but yes it's the design elements that are before you tonight. Thank you miss gallery. Are there any additional questions comments concerns from council. All right, seeing none I would like to hand it over to Councilman Alvarez I believe this is your item. Thank you very much. The resolution reasons follows resolution of the county, I'm sorry resolution that's Council of the city of Santa Rosa, denying an appeal and upholding the zoning, administrative design review approval for cost of Roseland. And the resolution that includes the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a four story 75 unit multi family affordable housing project located at 665 and 883 so basketball road, San Rosa, with the APN number of 125-101-031 and dash 037 file number dr 21-001 and I read further waving of the text. Thank you. Second second. We have a motion by Councilman Alvarez and a second by Councilman Sawyer. Now that we have a motion on the table, we can have a discussion. Seeing none. Madam city clerk. Can we call. Vice Mayor Rogers and my apologies that Council member Alvarez has his hand raised via zoom. I see it they keep doing that to me though. Every time I turn around and they want to put their hand up on zoom. Councilman Alvarez. I'll keep it on your toes. This question is for for Mr. Paulson. Yes, Councilman Alvarez. Good afternoon sir. In regards to the issue that we're seeing today. Is there is there a way to move forward with with with. Councilman Alvarez. Thank you. Thank you. The question I pose with you to the to the staff is if there had ever been an effort to purchase your property, or had you ever been interested in selling the property to the county at the time of the city now. I mentioned it to. County Council. To purchase my property. And they said, well, that's a great idea. We'll get an appraiser. We'll get an appraiser. We'll get an appraiser. We'll get an appraiser. That's not how you sell a property. Councilman Alvarez. You set your own price on it. You don't let the buyer say this is a price and you're going to take it. So if we can do a work around out around that. And protect my tenants. Very important to protect them because. And they're working. They're working for me and I'm helping them out by not. Exploiting their rent. So if you can, we can do something like that with some sort of work around and protect them. Yeah. I'll sell. But if not, I have in the judge rules against me will appeal it to the state Supreme Court. And I do appreciate the, the, the one, the one that you're taking care of your tenants. As I know them personally, and they speak very well of you. At the same time, I'm very sorry that, that I'm showing up to this party so late. And I wish that that. In reality, the community could have had a voice a lot earlier into the negotiation as I really. I hope the entire property being part of the future of rosin as one solid design. And I don't know. And I feel that, although it may be too late for something like that. I hope that in the future, both projects can look alike. And maybe those are the future plans that you have for renovation. I don't know when I can speak for you. But I did, I noticed that the hopes of the community to see a larger project that incorporates your property. And hopefully one day we get to see that as well. Thank you. Are there any additional questions, comments, concerns from council? All right, I have to take a second look over there. Madam City Clerk, can we please get a roll call vote? Thank you. Council Member Tibbets. Aye. Council Member Schwedhelm. Aye. Council Member Sawyer. Aye. Council Member Fleming. Yes. Council Member Alvarez. Aye. Vice Mayor Rogers. Aye. That motion passes with six ayes with Mayor Rogers absent. I'm going to move on to 15.2 City Manager. And please take it away. Vice Mayor Rogers and members of City Council. Item 15.2 is our second public hearing of the evening. And before the council is the placement of the annual stormwater enterprise charges on the Sonoma County property tax roll and the manner of collection. Claire Myers, our stormwater and creeks manager will be the presenter on this item. Good evening Mayor Rogers and members of the council. Do we have the PowerPoint presentation? Thank you very much. I am pleased to be here to discuss the placement of the annual stormwater enterprise charges on the Sonoma County property tax roll. Next slide. As we discussed earlier in this evening, the stormwater enterprise was created by council in accordance with title 16 of the city code in 1996. It provides funding for implementation of the city's national pollutant discharge elimination system or NPD S stormwater permit as well as activities such as creek restoration and stewardship flood protection, public education, storm drain maintenance and stormwater quality testing. Next slide. The calculated assessment is based on equivalent residential unit or ERU, which considers the size of the parcel, the amount of impervious surface and the land use of each parcel. The current ERU fee is $36.49, which was approved by council during the 2021-2022 budget process. In order to simplify the payment process for property owners and minimize collection expenses, it is requested that these charges be collected on the Sonoma County property tax roll on the city's behalf. The charges have been collected annually on the tax roll since they were established in September of 1996. Next slide. It is in the best interest of the city that those parcels not billed by the county due to the charges not meeting the county's $10 minimum to bill and or parcels with known incorrect ownership contact information shall not be separately billed by the city as the cost of separately billing exceeds the potential revenue. Any charges not collected will not affect other parcel charges. Next slide. The public hearing in accordance with title 16 of the city code will adopt the stormwater enterprise charge report, approve placing the charges on the county tax roll for collection, and allow the public the opportunity to protest the method of collecting the charges. Next slide. It is in the best interest of the city that those parcels not billed by Santa Rosa water at the council by resolution adopt a two-thirds vote, the stormwater enterprise charge report, and approve placement on the stormwater enterprise charges on the Sonoma County property tax roll to be collected by the Sonoma County auditor, controller, treasurer, tax collector. The Sonoma County property taxes are collected unless those charges do not meet the county minimum of $10 and or parcel owner contact information is known to be incorrect. Thank you. I'd like to bring you back to council for any questions. All right, seeing none. We'll now open public comment or public hearing on item 15.2. If you'd like to make a public comment via zoom, please raise your hand. If you're participating via telephone, please dial star nine. Vice mayor, there are no public comments live from council chamber, nor do I see any hands via zoom. Additionally, we received no voice message public comments on this item. Thank you so much. It looks like we're going to be handing it over to councilman Schwedhelm. This is your motion. Please be sure to close the public hearing. All right. Let's go ahead and close the public hearing. Now we're going to hand it over to councilman Schwedhelm. Thank you, madam vice mayor. I move a resolution of the council, the city of Santa Rosa, approving and adopting report for proposal to place stormwater and drainage charges on Sonoma County property tax roll for collection with county property taxes fiscal year 2021 through 2022 and waive for the reading of the text. Second. I have a motion by councilman Schwedhelm and a second by councilman Sawyer. It's now open for discussion by the council. Seeing no discussion. Madam city clerk. Can we please call a roll call vote. Councilmember tidbits. Hi. Councilmember Schwedhelm. Hi. Councilmember Sawyer. Hi. Councilmember Fleming. Yes. Councilmember Alvarez. Hi. Vice mayor Rogers. Hi. That motion passes with six eyes with councilmember Rogers absent. We will now move to item 16. There is currently no written communications. Now to item 17 public comments on non-agenda agenda items. So we will take public comment for item 13 and 17 at this time. Madam city host. If you wish to make a public comment on non-agenda matters, please raise your hand via zoom dial star nine and participating via telephone. Vice mayor, there are no public comments live from council chamber. Nor are there any hands via zoom? Are you okay if I move forward on the recorded public comment? Yes, please. 13 public comment on nine agenda items. Name is Dwayne D Witt from Roseland. Specifically, an issue came up with the way the board of community services essentially did not help the disadvantaged underserved community members. Of the Roseland Creek neighborhood be able to adequately participate in the decision for a master plan that was being discussed by staff. The dilemma is that it's a top down staff program rather than a bottom up. I think that community engagement, community empowerment type of activity, which could have been done, but staff for many years have overridden the community members. Due to that. The community groups have taken the effort to ask for there be a hearing with the planning commission. We couldn't find information on the city's website as to whether what would be the next step. There was a parent idea that the city council will be hearing the matter on the 29th of September. The community is quite concerned though that it needs to go to the planning commission. So there could be some a way to find collaborative and cooperative approaches to resolve in adequacies that have not been addressed. The city's top down approach from the staff of the parks department in the approach that's taking place right now has been a top down. There is no alternative approach. It has to be what staff wants. They have brushed aside a number of comments that have been put forward by concerned citizens from the neighborhood known as Roseland Creek, the most disadvantaged underserved and overburdened community. Not just in Santa Rosa, but all of Sonoma County. Please help those neighbors, make it a neighbor park, a neighborhood park excuse me with the neighbors participating in how it is actually designed, planned, built, maintained and managed. It's an important part of all the management and maintaining Southwest Park has turned in to just a very, very bad situation. Vice mayor that concludes public comment on non agenda matters. Okay. I like to thank everyone that joined us today and are participated in seeing no other business. I'd like to join the meeting. Thank you. I would like to say it is 606 and I don't think the mayor has done this yet. Congratulations vice mayor and your first meeting at the hell of a spoon.