 In the case of the copyright by Chris Cashtanova, the difficulties in drawing that line between the creativity from the human versus the output produced by the software, the computer program in that case. Again, in that case, the software used was a program called Mid Journey, which did not allow any post-production edits to be made. And I think that was a huge deal from the standpoint from the copyright office of looking at the amount of control the author had. And if you're not allowed to edit and you can't make any editing after you get the results back, basically the computer AI is doing the vast majority of the creativity and the prompt was not seen to be being enough to justify copyright protection.