 I'll keep my presentation brief, especially because I was involved only in a very small part of the project, and the idea of my task was to present our findings in a way that could be even more understandable for non-lawyers, to come up with a kind of graphical toolbox that would help a person to quickly identify what are the legal relations, and that's what you see here. Well, the first stage that I approached was to identify what are the, let's say, technical, what are the subjects and actors involved in the project, and what are their actions, what are their relations, and this is what you can see on this graph without looking at the coloured rectangles yet. So we can see these two clouds, which represent basically two main sources of data. The repositories being the sources of publications, and databases being the sources of other types of research data, as Professor Wiebe said, we adopted this broad concept of research data, and we could say that we have two types of actors here. We have a user of open-air infrastructure, but we also have the open-air plus infrastructure as such, which is kind of a robot, a kind of a machine, but it's generally operated by humans, and these two actors do something with the publications and third-party databases, and these activities are represented by all these arrows, which are tagged. So let's briefly from the left side, which is more or less the most straightforward way of using the open-air plus infrastructure, that is the user consults the databases of publications to be able to access the publications, which in technical terms means that the publication is being copied on the user's computer. And it also involves copying metadata for the publication. The user might get involved in supplying some data to the open-air infrastructure because the user is invited to edit the metadata and add links between publications and research data. This can be done by a user, by a human, but it's also being done by robots which are designed to work inside the open-air infrastructure, which do some data mining and they automatically infer and resolve some information about publications and data sets, and this is represented here by this part of the diagram. And also we can have the result of all these activities is that metadata is being copied from one database to another and certain external sources are being linked together. And now we can look at the colored rectangles and you have a legend here on the right side. There are four different types of rights which are included in copyrights and there are two different types of rights, which are parts of database sui generis rights, which are to a different extent involved. They might be infringed, or at least they are somehow applicable when each of these activities are being undertaken. And if we represent the whole relationship within the open-air plus project in this way, we come up to the conclusion that more or less such rights are being relevant when such activities are being undertaken and some activities might involve only one type of right. But what you can see is that there is no single activity which might be undertaken without taking into consideration either copyright or database right. And there is also a kind of a table which goes a bit more into detail. It explains what exactly triggers the applicability of a specific right. Sometimes we might conclude that some simple activities do not trigger applicability of a certain exclusive right. To some extent we might discuss whether some activities are exempted from the monopoly because of some exemptions like the scientific use exemption already mentioned here. But then again the scope of this exemption is not clear and it's not harmonized within the whole use. So there is a very big area of legal uncertainty. And that also holds for the database rights which are explained in the second table. So you probably know the same that the picture is worth a thousand words. Now I gave more or less a thousand words about a picture but I can make it even more, try to make it even more simpler. If you are an RPG fan you might follow what I want to say here is that engaging into using of data and publications is a kind of a pervious journey. So you have to prepare for it and not only should you have an elf with a bow and dwarf with an axe in your team but probably a lawyer with a legal toolbox that might become handy and might help you to reach your destination safely. To keep my part short I have just some conclusions which I want to highlight which are especially important from my perspective is that my conclusion is that we simply do not have sufficient scope of research freedom within the exceptions granted by the law. So the legislator should focus on that and all other solutions are only a kind of well there are certainly useful, you should use Creative Commons license.