 My name is Dr. Rohit Bharni, Junior Resident 3 from Bharati Vidyapit, Sangli, presenting author, Dr. Rohit Bharni, corresponding author, Dr. Vijay Kumar Esmane, affiliation of presenting author, Junior Resident 3, affiliations of corresponding author, Professor, Department of Related Diagnosis, Institution, Bharati Vidyapit, D.M.2B University, Medical College and Hospital, Sangli. The topic of my presentation is ultrasonographic findings in patients with ocular complaints. Aim of the presentation is to study the ultrasonographic findings in patients referred with ocular complaints. Objective to describe the USG features in various types of ocular diseases, to evaluate the role of ocular sonography and color Doppler in various ocular conditions. And comparison of USG findings in post-ocular to patients in selected cases. Introduction. Patients presenting with ocular complaints must undergo detailed ocular evaluation conventional methods which have been used for many years for evaluating the eye. Have included slit lamp and fundoscopy examination. These procedures can be conducted in the outpatient clinic without much discomfort of to the patients. Also the diagnostic accuracy of these investigations is fairly high. However these investigations require that the media should be non-opic. It is for this reason that these traditional investigations lose their importance if the clinicians wants to want to diagnose patients with an opaque cornea and cataract and the other pathologies which involve the retina and corad membrane. Image modalities such as CT and MRI have been used with high accuracy. So as to investigate the various pathologies of the orbit and group the CT scan has a very high exposure to radiation while MRI scan is associated with prohibitive costs. As a result, previously published literature has demonstrated the increasing use of ultrasound in diagnosing ocular diseases. Ultrasonography is not only cheap but also does not expose the patient to high doses of radiation. The investigation can be conducted with the help of portable machine which increases the accessibility of this modality and it can be conducted non-invasive layer as well. Materials and method, study design, it is a descriptive observation study, study setting, department of radiative diagnosis Bharti Vidyapit Medical College and Hospital Sangli, study population patient referred from the department of radiative diagnosis Bharti Hospital. Sangli for B scan with ocular complaints and fulfilling all these criteria of inclusion criteria. All cases with clinical suspicion of ocular diseases were eligible for the study admitting to Bharti Hospital Sangli where USG scan was used as modality aiding in evaluating the case exclusion criteria. Patient with active ocular surface infection, patient with either high risk or presents with extrusion of ocular contents, patients with orbital trauma results. In this presentation, 100 patients were included of which 10 patients had both eye affected so total of 110 eyes were studied. Average age was 57.37 plus minus 15.9 years ranging from two years to 86 years. It is observed that the 58% of the patients were in the age group of 51 to 70 years. Then there were 22% patients in the age group of 31 to 50 years. Based on USG the most common diagnosis formed was cataract which was presented in 30.3% of the involved eye. The next common diagnosis was that of retinal detachment which was presented in 17.3% of the involved eyes. Vitreous immerage was diagnosed in 11.8% of these involved eyes. Cataract with posterior vitreous detachment was diagnosed in 7% cases. Less common diagnosis were made that of a fechia in 6.4% dislocated slash subluxated lens in 5.5% retinal detachment with vitreous immerage in 3.6% only posterior vitreous detachment in 3.6% coroidal detachment in 2.7% and retinosis in 1.8%. There was one case each with old retinal detachment with cyst, optic glioma, posterior cephaloma, ID plus subretinal hemorrhage, thysis bulbide, uvitis with vitreous immerage with nemascularization glaucoma. There were 4 patients 3.6% who had no abnormalities detected on USGs. Discussion. The present observational study was carried out among patients who were referred with a clinical suspicion of ocular pathology to the department of red diagnosis for undergoing ocular B scan ultrasonography. The present study was conducted for December 2018 till May 2020 during which they underwent B scan USG based on the ocular USG findings of lens, vitreous membrane, coroid, retina and optic nerve were noted for all cases and a diagnosis was done. We included 100 patients in the present study of which 10 patients had both eye affected. So a total of 110 eyes were studied. In our study, mean age of the patients was 56.37 plus minus 15.9 years and 58% of the patients were in the age group of 51 to 70 years. Also males and females were equally distributed. The most common presenting complaint was diminished vision 99%. There were 9 cases with pain and 5 cases with each with redness of eye and eye discharge. There was no history of surgery trauma or trauma in 78% of the cases of the result of the rest 11% as had a history of trauma and 10% were previously operated for cataract and one case for retinal detachment. In our study, 28% were diabetics, 18% hypertensive and 2% were both diabetic and hypertensive. The discussion points include actual length of the affected eye, USG findings of the lens in affected eye, USG finding of the posterior segment of the affected eye, USG finding of retina, USG finding of the coroid, USG finding of the optic nerve, USG diagnosis in the affected eye, accuracy of USG diagnosis based on comparison of USG findings in postoperative patients in selected cases. These are the following references. We took 50 references out of 50 references. These are the top 8 references in our study.