 the big question is why legal action, but can I also put it this way? There is a different tone from CPS from Pedro Martinez. He was asked, you know, what's going to happen to those who don't have their vaccines? And he said the other day, we're going to work with them. We're going to talk to them. We're going to make sure what try to understand what's going on. So why a different tone for CPS than the police? Well, I don't think there is a different tone for one versus the other. We believe that the FLP leadership is trying to foment an illegal work stop at the strike, pure and simple. We've laid that out in the materials and we're not just, we're not having that. The contract is clear and it's been known for a long time. The police unions are not authorized to strike. It's in their collective bargaining agreement and it's a matter of state law. What we've seen from the fraternal order of police and particularly the leadership is a lot of misinformation, a lot of half truths and frankly, flat out lies in order to induce an insurrection.