 Hi, I got a name 840 here, so I got a comment from Drew Fraser, he posted on my video regarding the Port Arthur Massacre and the new movie Nitrum, which is about the Port Arthur Massacre. So I got a bunch of comments and unfortunately YouTube's algorithm just automatically deleted Drew Fraser's comment without me getting to see it. And Star Lion comments, I didn't hear you use the word Tasmania once, have you ever lived there? I've never lived there, I've never been there. Maybe ask the people who live there how they feel about Nitrum or the Port Arthur Massacre. Okay, I'd be happy to ask them but I don't think it has that much to do with my reaction to this 2021 movie Nitrum. So the Port Arthur Massacre, that was an event that took place in 1996 and 35 people were murdered and 23 others were wounded and the murderer of Martin Bryant, Led Gorty, was given 35 life sentences without the possible parole and the movie Nitrum is primarily about Martin Bryant prior to the massacre. We're having a fair dinkum thunderstorm right now, I mean lightning unbelievably loud, very exciting. So Drew Fraser says, look, I listened to your confident rejection of the conspiracy theory that Martin Bryant was convicted wrongfully of the Port Arthur Massacre, then decided to look out the Joe Viles book mentioned by one of your listeners on the live stream. Spent several hours this morning reading the book, Viles convinced me that it is a mistake to suppose that Martin Bryant was guilty on the basis of the story told in either the Nitrum movie or the mainstream media. Even a quick reading of the forward to Viles book will provide you with a concise statement of the facts of the case which cast serious doubt on the official narrative. So I have not read this Joe Viles book and from what I've read about Joe Viles, it doesn't seem like reading his work would be a good use of time. So for example, the first crime scene, the Broad Afo Aro Cafe in less than a minute, the shooter left 20 people dead. Okay, in a total of no more than 30 minutes at six crime scenes, 35 people were shot dead. Is it really likely the young man with an IQ of 66, no firearms training could achieve such a kill rate or a higher ratio of kill to wounded? Few trained combat shooters could accomplish such a feat of marksmanship. I don't know anything about that. I just don't, I am not aware of any evidence that would convince me that the Port Arthur Mascare is some kind of sigh up or conspiracy theory. But Drew Fraser says, taken as a whole Joe Viles book presents a powerful primer facie case, primer fashion case for Martin Bryant's innocence. Remember as well, there was no trial, which the prosecution case was tested before a jury his conviction was based upon a guilty plea. Attained only months after constant pressure to confess, even though he was isolated from his family for months, Martin Bryant maintained his Indians innocence. Now you're suggesting this video that everything we do or fail to do has an impact on other people? True. Your casual rejection of the listener's suggestion, you should check out the Viles book may have a negative influence on other people. Good challenge, but I just don't know of any cases where these supposed sigh ups, that there's any substantial evidence that any of them have actually taken place with regard to mass shootings. You're suggesting to your audience that it matters not whether there might have been a credible case for the defense case that was effectively suppressed during the summary proceeding that led to Martin Bryant's conviction in the year since I've never known situation like this sort of mass shooting that would turned out to be a sigh up. So that's my reaction. Drew Fraser says, I put it to you that you are to Martin Bryant and others who may believe in his innocence to take seriously the case for his defense in the charge of perpetrating the port of the massacre. Your conspicuous failure to do so in this video is not the act of the responsible citizen conscious of the effect of his actions or inactions on others. So who is this Joe Viles character? So last name is spelled V-I-A-L-L-S. So this is why I can't take anything that Joe Viles writes seriously. He believed that the 2004 Asian tsunami was a joint CIA massade operation. OK, so that giant 2004 Asian tsunami, he thinks it was a joint CIA massade operation. That's ridiculous. So he also claims that the death of Diana Princess of Wales was a Zionist plot and he links the CIA massade to the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing trial. And he claims that he claims that the port of the massacre was an Israeli operation. All right, I think this is ludicrous. So he claims that it was a misdoveem counterterrorism unit of the Israeli Defense Force who carried out the port of the massacre. There's no evidence for that. That's ludicrous to claim that the 2004 Asian tsunami was a CIA massade plot is ludicrous. That's just nuts. That's that's insane. So we just don't have any evidence for any major mass shooting that somehow it's a sigh out by the government. And I mean, this guy, I mean, this guy is really, really, really off. So he's a private invest. He was a private investigator. He died in 2005. And he claimed that the American Airlines Flight 77 did not really crash into the Pentagon. He claimed that it was an Israeli LL flight. The CIA is currently redirecting an asteroid to take out half of humanity. So vile theories are received support among many Muslim factions in Indonesia, which treat his theories as as fact. So he has theories about the Bali bombing. But I guess it was the work of massade. So everything's the work of massade, according to Joe Viles. So he lived from 1944 to July, 2005. He lived in Perth, Australia. So he claimed that the Port Arthur massacre, the terror attacks in Bali and Jakarta and the 2004 Asian tsunami were all the work of Israeli and American secret agents. And he claimed that he wrote these reports in the interest of public safety and the death of Princess Diana. OK, Princess of Wales. It was a Zionist plot. OK, it's just I just find it impossible to to take someone like this seriously. So he claims that Zionists were nooking downtown Beirut. They're everything, essentially everything evil that's happening in the world is the fault of the Zionists, the massade and the CIA working together. Hard to take that sort of argumentation seriously.