 What formal procedure do you follow to resolve a dispute with a researcher or an institution in case of an ethical misconduct? So in case of ethical misconduct, if we actually find that something has been intentionally done, we will inform all authors about the problem and consider often whether the paper should either be rejected or retracted. And that's one line, one is we need to make sure the literature does not, is cleaned from all these errors. And then the second portion is to determine whether the institution should be informed because sometimes there may be misconduct in one article, but you don't know if there's misconduct in other contributions from this group. And so it's important to consider whether the institution should take a look as well. In cases of authorship dispute, which are not considered misconduct, it's hard for a journal to determine whether who should be an author and whether the first author should be the second author and not the first in cases, things like that. So we also inform the institution and ask them to mediate the dispute because really we are not in a position to make those decisions, but we don't want to publish a paper where someone is being denied their appropriate role within the authorship list. In your experience, have you noticed a higher incidence of ethical misconduct from non-native English speaking authors versus English speaking authors? I don't think we have. In general, we have just as many cases. I think each year we check to see whether they're basically US-centered versus non-US-centered. We have about 50% give or take a few percentage points every year where half of our issues come from outside of the US and half of our issues come from inside. In terms of each paper, there's so many authors that we don't differentiate whether the first author or the last author is a native speaker or not. But I don't think that ethics issues are limited or specific to one group of people. Absolutely. I think that's the bias towards foreign authors or non-native English speaking authors. Good to clarify that. Right. And I think every journal has a set of standards. And so every time an author goes to submit a paper, they have to follow the guidelines that each journal, to the journal that they're submitting it to. And so errors can happen at any time. And ideally, they're errors due to lack of knowledge and not due to intent to deceive somebody. So for every incidence, we try to make sure there's an education component about what the policy is and why it might not have been adhered to appropriately and then try to find a way to address it. The cases that are rare, ideally, for the most part, are when people do something intentionally. And in that case, it doesn't matter what country you come from, it's an intentional act.