 A few months ago, there was this politician leader who belongs to one of the parties from South India and he made a comment where he said that Sanatan Dharma is like a parasite and he compared it like COVID-19 or malaria or dengue that needs to be eradicated. I would understand that if it was just a vote bank politics, but it felt that somewhere he believed that that is what should be done. So I wanted to understand how does one reach that point where they're able to say something without realizing what they're saying. Firstly, I'd just like to suggest to him to correct himself. So there's a parasite, something called a parasite and there's something called a parasitoid. You know the difference? You're a scientist. No, okay. So a parasite is something that feeds off the body of the host and a parasitoid is something that feeds off the body of the host till it kills it and that's it. And I would tend to say that Sanatan Dharma is more parasitoid than a parasite. So that might be a suggestion to make to him and once he has understood that then we can take up the next conversation. I think this kind of rhetoric is vote bank politics, you know, because in the state where he is, because I know who you're speaking about, there's a very high Christian population and he's speaking to them because he needs their vote. So he's not going to say that Sanatan Dharma is this amazing thing because the Christians won't vote for him if he does that in many of the areas of that state, the Christian population is now higher than the Sanatani population, the Hindu population. So it's also some sort of vote bank rhetoric. But if one wants to take a statement that face value, then the question that one has to ask him is why does he believe that the freedom afforded by Sanatana Dharma to each individual to take up their way to the truth is worse than a religion that puts fear into the individual. See in Europe it's much less of a problem now, but here in India it's a fear based religion. People are terrified. They cover down. Once they are converted, they're threatened that if they leave the religion, it's their apostates and then they go against God and they'll go to hell and all of that stuff is trickled down into their heads and it's just anti-freedom. So he'll have to explain why he prefers the prison of religions to the freedom of Dharma. And if he's a communist, which most likely is also the case, then he'll have to explain if he's interested in the economic survival of his population because if you look at the state of West Bengal, which is a communist state, its economy has, it has self-destructed since independence. So there doesn't seem to be any logic to what he's saying and I don't think there's a lot of thought behind it and I doubt very much that he has explored Sanatani philosophy or Sanatani Agama to be able to pronounce on it. So my advice to him would be to take up the Bhagavad Gita and just read through it once. I doubt he's done that. And then he'll understand what freedom is and then perhaps he'll free himself from his misunderstanding of the situation. Maybe he should change it to parasitoid. I think I would suggest that to him. Namaskar.