 Law and economic reforms are inseparable. They are definitely like signage to him. Nobody knows which one comes first. Laws bring about new economic reforms. Whereas many economic reforms lead to rewriting of new laws. The process of liberalization entails creation of an ambience which lead to rendering of many older laws as incompatible and redundant leading to rewriting of newer laws. But I personally feel that if the legal fabrication and handling of a system are not geared up to the economic changes which are sought to be brought about, it leads to derailing of the economic change process, liberalization process, stifling it completely or failing to achieve the desired results. In a society which is governed by a rule of law, it's the law which has to define the parameters within which the economic change has to be brought about smoothly and without an abrasion. We all know that law cannot survive in vacuum. It has to constantly change, recast and reinterpret so as to meet the changing needs of the society. Law charged with the basic values of life plays an important role, a critical role in contributing towards the socio-economic change, not the economic change only, socio-economic change. And we all coming from different segments play an important role, an integral role, a fundamental role in bringing about change in the society. Law has to move forward with the changing times. Thank you so much. I think I'll buy this over now.