 According to Talcott-Parson, there are basically two elements of social organizations known as social roles and social collectivities. Social roles represent the most elementary particles of social organization which are basically the normative expectations of actions for distinct positions and every possible social interaction does have some kind of roles. And on the other hand, the collectivities they represent the higher level of social organization. They are basically clusters of roles systematically organized for specific societal structure. So according to Talcott-Parson, two types of elements are social roles, which are at individual level and collectivities means that wherever social organizations are, they are a single role, but they are not dependent on the cluster of roles. So a lot of people, together with the collective actions, determine the behavior of social organizations and each person has their own contribution in this combination. Because Parson also argues that bureaucracies have also been important social organizations in a society which are rationally involved with time and basically also discuss two types of social organizations such as democratic associations and the professional associations. So Talcott-Parson can seek to social organizations kisi bhi moshrek ko reflect kati hai, ush moshrek ki andar existing behavior ko, existing style of working ko reflect kati hai, unko understand karne kili hai, kisi ko evaluate yaar jaj karna chahiye, Talcott-Parson ka hi kyaal hai ki jaisi bureaucracies hai. Ab bureaucracies single, ek individual ko represent nahi karthi, balki wo collective actions ki reflection hai, yani jis moshre system ke andar, bureaucracie properly work kati hai, to iska matlab yeh hoga, ke poora ka poora system kyu hai, mechanism properly smoothly chal raha hai. Acha isko agar humne bohot aasaan lafso mein samajna ho, to hum yeh samajsakte hai, ke agar poibi developing world, developing world mein kisi moshrek ki kahaani hum likh na chahi ya batana chahi, koncept ko explain karne ke liye, agar kehi par maingai pohot zyada hai, waha par system ke andar, logon ke kaam smoothly nahi chal rahe. To iska matlab kya hoga, ke wo social organization, jo responsible hai, in cheezon ko manage karne ke liye, wo organization apna kaam sahi tari ke se saranjam nahi de rahi, kyunki yeh kaam jinn ka taluk moshre se taluk rakhne wale to maam logon ki collective responsibility se hai. Yani jinn logon ke zoom mein yeh kaam hai, jinn ka yeh farz hai, agar wo majmui tar par surte hal mein apna rol perform nahi kar rahe, to aisi social organization ki wajah se, moshrek ki andar, boh sarin masail janam liye tahan, jisse society mein disturb hoti hai, aur system bhi disturb hota hai. Acha isi tari ke se, kuch aur organizations, jo social organizations hoti hai, wo jisi kuch professional organizations hai, maslain, apke doctors ki organizations hai, kuch lawyers ki associations hai, kuch professors ki associations hai, agar wo specifically apne profession ke liye kaam kar rahe hai, wo uske liye jawab de honge, lakin wo organizations, jisse bureaucracy hai, wo collectively, wo sumaam situation ke liye answerable hai, jisme law and order bhi aajahega, jiske andar rule application aajahegi ki kawaneen ki pass tari kese karbhae ja rahe hi hai, policies jo hukumtoin banati hai, uski implementation kese ho rahe hi hai, agar bureaucracy, upar hukumat ke saath cooperate nahi kar rahe hi, to nizam ki andar, boh sarin masail peda honge. To Telcourt Parsons ki nizdeeg, ek to wo organizations hai, jo khud individual, lakin apne profession ke andar milkar banati hai, aur pheer ek wo collective organization hai, jo answerable hai, un to maam kaamu ke liye, jo uske roll ke saath attached hai, jise humne abhi bureaucracy ki misal jo hai, usko discussi kya hai.