 The prevalence of hearing loss is high in rising, but only about 20% of adults seek help. Fortunately, modern technology allows for alternative, more accessible solutions to hearing care. One such example is, the Digits and Noise Test, which is available directly to the public over internet-based platforms. So, how does a Digits and Noise Test work? In an adaptive procedure, digit triplets are presented in speech-weighted masking noise to determine the level at which 50% of digit triplets could be recognized correctly. Previous versions either sequentially tested each ear, taking about 7 minutes to complete. Or, used binaural dietic testing, where identically-faced digits and noise are presented to each ear, simultaneously, cutting test time in half. Although binaural testing is fast, it precludes detection of unilateral sensory neural hearing loss. Neither monoral, or binaural dietic versions, detect conductive hearing loss. This is an important subgroup, where medical evaluation may be indicated. A newer version, phase inverted the digits in one ear 180 degrees, while leaving noise in phase. This is called the antifasic digits and noise test. By engaging binaural interaction, normal hearing listeners can better segregate digits from the noise. However, antifasic processing is disrupted in cases of unilateral sensory neural, or, conductive hearing loss. Making the tests sensitive to detect those types of losses, as well. Therefore, we have a great tool for hearing loss detection, which has combined sensitivity and specificity of more than 85%. Although highly accurate, a single antifasic digits and noise test cannot discriminate between hearing loss type. Therefore, everyone is referred along the same pathway. To the audiologist. Is there a way to discriminate between hearing loss types? Turns out, there is. Using a combination of antifasic and dietic tests, we can determine three categories of hearing. Normal hearing. Bilateral sensory neural. And, unilateral sensory neural or conductive hearing loss. Normal hearing listeners will be able to pass both tests, while in cases of bilateral sensory neural hearing loss, both tests should be a failed result. Unilateral or conductive hearing loss, should fail an antifasic test, while passing a dietic test. Using fixed cut-offs, we could correctly classify 75% of hearing loss types. When using a fixed antifasic and varying dietic cut-off, we could improve classification, to 79%. By distinguishing between these types, we could optimize referral pathways and resource allocation in constrained settings. That's our study in a nutshell. Thanks for listening.