 Well, I just want to start off by thanking Carl for inviting us to participate and comment here today. And it's – I'm Mike Walsh, I'm the CEO of U.S. Legal Markets for LexisNexis. And it's a great thing to be here and to see some of the examples of innovation that folks have presented to us today from the government. And the GovPulse team, Rob, Harlan, Roy, Ray, I think it's terrific what you guys are doing. And it's great to see those examples. So nice to be here and nice to see that. I'm here not just as the CEO of U.S. Legal Markets for LexisNexis, but as a lawyer and a citizen of the United States of America. And I recognize the critical role that access to justice plays in our society. And I recognize the importance that access to legal information plays in that mission. At LexisNexis, we look at our mission as one of fundamentally supporting the rule of law across the globe as the basis of any civilized society. And I believe that we all share that in common today. We have about 3,000 lawyers at LexisNexis that are employed by the company. And they join our roughly 13,000 non-legal colleagues that work hard to support the rule of law around the world. We work free of charge, for example, with the Southern African Litigation Center to provide access to the country's entire legal content, not dissimilar in some ways to what is going on here today and the mission here today. We also work free of charge to provide standard access to the legislative code in Iraq. We got approached by a colonel in the military who asked us to work with them in supplying the laws to Iraq. We also work free of charge with the U.S. State Attorney Generals to help train an enforcement for professionals with respect to the needs of human trafficking. So these are just some of the examples of things that we do that we look at as consistent with the mission of the rule of law. And last year, we donated about $5 million in cash and in-kind contributions and thousands of employee volunteer hours to work to support the rule of law and pro bono across the globe. And I and our employees believe deeply in that mission and we are very committed to supporting that mission. And advancing the rule of law is something that LexisNexis and I think many of the folks around this room here have in common and access to basic legal content is at the very definition of the rule of law, in my mind at least. Laws must be clear, they've got to be publicized, they've got to be stable, fair and accessible to all. At the same time, providing access to basic legal content should not be confused with the role that legal publishers like LexisNexis and others play in the market. Our business model is predicated on the value that we can really bring and add on top of that legal content. We put more than 300,000 cases a year as an example through our editorial enhancement process resulting in about 800,000 subsequent editing jobs. In addition to citation, validation, standardized formatting, opinion summaries and head notes essential to the outcomes of each case, our thousands of lawyers routinely bring to the court's attention items within new case law data that are missing or incorrectly referenced. So this is something that our lawyers spend lots of time scouring through and helping to ensure the accuracy of the legal foundation in our society. We've got lawyers to review more than 1,000 cases a day and link those cases to other cases via shepherds of service that I'm sure everybody here is familiar with. And this is a process that's been refined for more than 100 years. And there's hundreds of thousands of lawyers across the country who depend on providing those accurate and relevant links. Our analytics combined multiple data sources help lawyers determine whether or not a case is good law and we also track hundreds of thousands of legislative and regulatory developments and changes across our federal and state governments each year to keep our statutory and regulatory databases current. And our analytics not only give lawyers the confidence in the data but help them work faster and more efficiently. And to support that we've integrated our content into numerous software tools to enable our customers to do their work more easily and efficiently and effective. These are tools like ones that we own, for example, like a case map, but they also involve general software tools in the marketplace. So we recently partnered with Microsoft, for example, we're integrating all of our content into Word and SharePoint and Outlook so you can seamlessly access that content as you use those tools. Basically we learned and it's pretty obvious that our customer base spends a huge chunk of their time in those tools so we want it to be where our customers are. And that's effectively what we do, whether it's an iPad, an iPhone, software tools on the web we seek to be where our customers are and add value to the process. So those are just some of the examples of what we do with our many thousands of lawyers to help add value to legal content. And each year we invest hundreds of millions of dollars to improve upon these processes and that's not just in building out editorial content but that's also technology and fabrication processes, et cetera. And over the hundreds of years, really, that these services have supported the legal society across the globe, we and other companies like us have accumulated significant experience in how to ensure the highest quality standards and to make sure that our customers get what they want in a timely and accurate fashion. And we believe that's a very, very important thing to support the legal foundation of society because you've got to be able to rely on accuracy. So we welcome the chance to join this conversation on the merits of a central repository for raw legal data. And whatever disagreements there may be on the best way to achieve standardized free public domain content access, there can be no doubt that the effort embraces the fundamental concepts of the rule of law and the noblest intentions of the people who value it. I thought Tim did a nice job articulating the challenges that any publisher or service provider in the industry encounters when seeking to provide content to society and they are significant and they are costly. And some of the questions I've just been jotting down as I've been listening to the many participants that I think are ones that this group and others will probably need to grapple with over time is, you know, who is really the audience that we're seeking to address here and this was raised earlier, but is it the consumer, is it the lawyer, and how do you target those audiences? Because their needs are very different and distinct. How do we ensure accuracy in the effort? The last thing you want is somebody relying on a piece of law that is not valid law or that's not legitimate or that's been overturned or that there's something out there creating a distinction on it. And so that's an important factor. What are the standards and who sets them and how do they get set? How do we coordinate the myriad of agencies, government entities, et cetera that are involved in the process? What are the costs of the approach and how is that managed? Clearly lots of questions, you know, associated with the effort, those are just some of the ones I jotted down off the top of my head as I listened to the group. So that's my context, hopefully that's a little bit of background on our business and the role we see for ourselves in the industry.