 I'll take up first the questions which were raised by our editor of Argus News, that what is a welfare nation and how we should look at a welfare nation and where does tourism come into that part of it. I think as a business professor, we teach these to our students that welfare nation has nothing to do with competitiveness. As a business professor, we teach these to our students that welfare nation has nothing to do with competitiveness. As a business professor, we teach these to our students that welfare nation has nothing to do with competitiveness. As a business professor, we teach these to our students that welfare nation has nothing to do with competitiveness. As a business professor, we teach these to our students that welfare nation has nothing to do with competitiveness. So, we have asked that if we don't look at the welfare nation, then who should we look at? In English, we call it productivity. Productivity is a kind of growth. In other words, productivity is a kind of growth that we use for the machine. In less time, we produce the machine and increase productivity. The part of it is that if we use the people's work to increase the skill, then productivity is a growth. So, if we look at the focus of this government, the central government and the 5-10 years, the second part of it is that we can increase the skill of the people. If we increase the skill of the people, then we can increase the skill of the people in less time. Because the concept of ULC is unique labour cost. Productivity and competitiveness are unique labour cost. We can take an example. Let's look at America. Everybody always benchmarks with America. In America, the country is very productive but not competitive because the unique labour cost is very high. The cost of hiring an employee for a certain period of time in dollar terms is very high. But if you look back to China, which almost we benchmark with China everything, and there are certain components good or bad, we have overtaken China in that part, we'll find out their ULC is under control because it is a communistic nation. They have controlled their unique labour cost. That's why their productivity is higher. The reason being they have been able to be competitive in the world there. So, welfare nations are not necessary competitive nations. And for the first time when you are skilling people, then you understand that by skilling people, you would like to increase the productivity of the nation, though you can provide a support as far as welfare is concerned. You cannot really call yourself a military, economic or autocratic system, where you can say there is no welfare required for growth of a nation, particularly a populated nation like India. So, it has to be a balance between productivity and competitiveness. And since we are into a multi-party democratic system, you cannot have an ULC other than you are giving them a support. This is the answer to the question. I agree with you the point that you have raised. The focus of governance strategy should be on increasing the productivity of the people and increasing the skill of the people that we have got here. Let's talk about tourism next. So, I have been doing this for quite a long time. I studied abroad. I met Jack here That was my second camp. I ran on India tourism when I was working. First I did the work for Kerala tourism, and then India tourism. से जख्यो आसे की बोद्वे कलिकर जोटिम रोगतली, अपना मैं जनती कलिकर पखरे प्रत्हमें मोसुमि आसे, सअई ती बूमि कु चूमें मोसुमि, आपुरा सहर अंदारे जाए से समरे, पुरा अंदारे जाए, जे तोले वर्सा आसे, इव्दारन्दि दवार अर्थ्� light the prominently इंदिन तूरुज्म इज्रिज्यजाज तूरुज्म संटर बाग़े अज्जद्या को गुरो कर द्यागगला, जम ती आपनो ख्रिकेट रे आपिल ल डेखिले, the transportation and trade was happening in the river, that's why it's one of the key places for that matter. You look at Banaras, you look at Elabad, you look at Puri, all these places, there are temples and the economic review around the temples and urbanization happened around the temples. Over a period of time, because of British Dominion here, we started neglecting our temples and we thought probably we can build up alternative destination for that matter. Today, in last 10, 15 years' period of time, I think we have gone back to our roots and you have started looking at that destination which was most popular destination. In India, when we talk about pilgrimage tourism, if you look at in terms of volume of number of people travelling within the country, highest number of people travel for pilgrimage tourism. There is a paradigm shift happening there, paradigm shift, religious people are making trips. Even today also if you look back, how many people have flown to Ajodhya, a large chunk of those people are either upper class or middle class which are moved into. So there has been a repositioning of religious tourism. If that happens in the country, you can identify there will be multiple destinations on which tourism can be promoted because we have a heritage which can be promoted there. I teach at a school called Bordeaux. If you don't know where is Bordeaux, Bordeaux is in south of France. So Bordeaux is known for the world. During second world world, 60,000 people were killed. So when you go, you would find out 60,000 coffins of similar size there. But Bordeaux is also one of the destinations of the world for wine tourism. Best quality of the wine available in Bordeaux there. So French tourism department has identified specific, domain specific tourist destinations and have promoted them in that way. If you go to a city of Nice which is beautiful as such or to Paris which has got monuments versus a city of Bordeaux which doesn't have anything but have chattis, then you will identify they have done. So what is required from a national tourism planning, we need to look at regional tourism planning. My experience while working at I am Lucknow, I was just talking to madam that I started my career at I am Lucknow post my PhD. I was given an assignment with urban planning department to decongest tourist destinations. This is an anti-theses to what we talk today that have more number of people visiting tourist destinations. But they wanted us to work decongestion of tourist destinations so that people can have smooth flow of transportation. That was the first assignment that I handled. Subsequently when I moved to Coricord, I did campaign, North East campaign I wrote and then I wrote also Kerala campaign for that. So what is required? Let me come to that part and conclude my conversations. What is required in this part? So what is required? When we are in the family system break, people are not able to go anywhere. People are not able to go anywhere, people are not able to answer your questions. We have two ways to think. First we are thinking that how do we really look at foreign travellers coming to India. What you understood are people who are willing to travel in the country domestic tourism. So if you can really generate a good domestic tourism strategy, then probably we will make more money from that systematorium size.. .. .. .. అరసిత్ై నిలాని టుఎల఍వైకి బత్యాబ్సం మరిమైం క్నంచి సి రిమిత్వ్వి పట్ంచ్అస్ మరిసినాబ్కి పయసిక్సత్సి ప్ర్సం మయసికికిపని ప� కిమ్రానానింటి కిమంట్డి మిమ్పూనాయప్తిండి. వాటాప Quan were... 我 was in Bedin చినిసఆ సిహటో机 es responding to the palace మోొరిములతఘ మ౔టా Gramm పి మఎరదపె█واనం ధషరింకలి site when reciting come through Augmented�౿నినిదది త౿కెరనికహన టరం difference不管 lebrity and everyone interested. Instead of visiting to the destination at no cost, can go and see the place. I think there will be desire for people to travel for that matter. Today I understand that tourism department has examinations conventions conferences. What is that bearishable product. Once the examination is over or the convention is over. Nobody can continue to do that baby and the reinforcement is more important behavioral change Jung? It is possible if you will have augmented virtual reality. Look that since we are Medicarepeople నాసితా నిల్నియ్శ్వా, గానిందిదా మిబ్కి మనినికియాలా, మరోట్న్స్ర్ కరిందియాలెఎపి రోరురుపిస్త్త్ట్తి, మరురు పిసింది సిటున్� is the experience doesn't matter whether it is a temple experience or to an industrial tour or it goes to a village that experience matters there so somebody definitely will create a vision and our prime minister is a visionary who has done that part but expect that both public and private people should sit together the PPP was the idea that he was talking about they can work together a strategy a sustainable strategy for that matter and execution is very important and that is where i think skill entrepreneurship and tourism can work together to create an execution plan and they can execute that part recently i was doing some work on the health tech space then i said that let's create an entrepreneur in every panchayat and how many health workers are there and how many amount of money we can generate it was a diagnostic business conversation similarly if you can create a tech savvy tourist entrepreneur at a panchayat level who uses a hub and spoke model and does community best tourism i think we can create more number of employment opportunity for the people we should not look up to large investments or large entrepreneurs like mr patnaik for a massive proposition or potential like tourism we should go back and democratize the idea of entrepreneurship and build small-time sustainable entrepreneurs because the number of job requirements are very high and no government can really provide those number of jobs on a sustainable period of time that is where you have to think alternative and look into that part of it because finally that experience is more important and how do you build that experience if the experience is bad all that strategy you have made all the campaigns that i wrote all those money which has been spent on television all are west now once you democratize the process and train people to build that experience and sustain that experience then there will be a flow in the process and people will be more interested for traveling because as such by nature we are nomads isn't it like all other animals we are nomads we have we are more intelligent only other animals because our intestine length is smaller than other animals i was told that an elephant takes 14 hours for full stomach eating and digestion and we take five to ten minutes for doing that part since we have this intelligence and we can utilize this intelligence and look back to an economic system which is sustainable and then we'll be successful there because i understand tourism is a smokeless business and it has the highest potential for creating more number of jobs compared to others because manufacturing or services either they use machines or they use technical manpower but tourism just by changing the mindset making people oriented towards their customers will make it successful but more important when you go back think over this last question of mine so idea of a western thought like tourist or a guest is not a pure idea we have to bring back to our indian ideas of who a guest is or who a bandhu is the day you have a bandhu the experience or anubhuti of the bandhu becomes more important for you than anything else i hope the four five key points that i have talked about will guide the thinkers those who are present here and let's plan it out and promote orisa tourism and national tourism in a bigger way so that a lot of people travel and see this world because this is only one life that we have got thank you ladies and gentlemen