 All right, so Locke is trying to distinguish his account of knowledge from Plato's, right? He's rejecting Plato's account. That's fine, right? We know that much. But the question is exactly how is he rejecting Plato's account of knowledge? And for this, he's going to reject in some way Plato's account of the forms. So if you remember from that discussion that we had when we deal with Plato's account of the forms, he's got four characteristics of form. We have that form is known through reason. Form is objective knowledge. Form is the universal. And form is eternal. So we looked at this question as far as rejecting Plato's account of the forms. We looked at this before when we dealt with Aristotle. Aristotle rejected the last condition. That form is eternal. So here's a question. How does Locke reject Plato's conception of form? Which of the four, or all of the four, are some of the four of these characteristics that Locke reject?