 Cook has a question related to this. Do you think Ocasio-Cotter's is a Marxist? She echoed Marxist ideas terms and is a dues-paying member of the Democratic Socialist America, which promotes Marxism. I mean, yeah, I mean, she's a Marxist extent that anybody on the left, everybody on the left, from an economics perspective, is to some extent a Marxist, influenced by Marx. I don't think she's a Marxist in the sense that she's read Marx, studied Marx, understands Marx, advocate for Marxism-Quarism. I think she's a Marxist in that she has absorbed Marxist ideas about economics, Marxist ideas about exploitation, Marxist ideas about wages and about income inequality. But she's absorbed it from not necessarily Marxist economists like Joseph Stigler, who I wouldn't call a Marxist economist. He's a bad economist. He's a Keynesian economist. He's a statist economist. But I wouldn't call him necessarily a Marxist economist in the sense of believing in materialism and the necessity for certain progress in history and the dialectic. And Marx wrote very little economics. Most of what he wrote is, in a sense, philosophy, history, and his interpretation of the application in a sense of Hegel, to his particular way of seeing the world. Most economists, while influenced by Marx, while some of their concepts are concept-taped learned from Marx, are not pure philosophical Marxist. And I don't think she is either. I think she's a typical, well, typical progressive, typically where on the left, I don't think she's particularly, I don't think she's necessarily a nihilist in the sense that she wants to see stuff destroyed. I think she's just a, not a very, she's an unthinking, but not a stupid. You'll see. I think she's quite smart. An unthinking, ignorant, conventional from an economics perspective, you know, spokesman for the progressive left.