 and non-prescriptive. From the Euro to environment, to the use of energy, how to stop wars and famines. We're competing over resources. We're competing over who writes the rules for the global economy. But at the same time, we have a world of hyper interdependence. The future of one country is completely linked to the future of the next. The problem is that we have an architecture of power which corresponds to the economic architecture of the 1970s. Science, technology, the market and economics are globalized. Politics are not. No one seems to have not even the superpowers, the power that is needed to tackle the problems that the world is facing. The issues are across borders with each other, so it's a huge enterprise. Governments can't keep pace and things change just so quickly. The danger is that some of those challenges become very immediate and very, very problematic indeed. What are the new sorts of models that we can think about that will allow for the provision of public goods going forward? We need to think holistically. Get a more global perspective on problems and get a perspective from different points of view, from the private sector, from government, from academics, from think tanks and activists. Business, science and technology, media, they all have a seat at the table when decisions are deliberated on. It comes down to collaboration. There's no one company, no one country, no one NGO or university that has all the answers. Be inclusive of many perspectives that have both the depths to deal with the technical issues and the breadth to deal with all the linkages across the world. If we don't try to tackle them in this multi-stakeholder approach it's going to be very difficult to solve them. Constructive collaboration across knowledge boundaries and subject areas is what makes this network unique. We know what the world's most pressing challenges are. We have the opportunity to jointly shape the global agenda. We are trying to contribute to the social media network and we are trying to be part of it, but we are trying to bring out the largest number of ideas and views. There's only one thing that's moving now on the social media network. These are discussions that are being discussed at the meeting. These are discussions that are being discussed at the World Agenda. I would like you to think about this issue with these comments and ideas. I would like you to share with me any ideas that you have. I have a number of them. I have been focusing on young people and the challenges of employment and the global institutions. These are issues that need to be addressed by the international community. These are issues that need to be addressed by the international community. These are issues that need to be addressed and we are trying to focus on them. We are trying to focus on them. You will hear hearing from the President and the Director, LIKE the global economy, Nobody is as effective as you're! This committee is going to start with you. Thank you and call on the humans tomia. We don't have a current system, a system that is more or less organized. There are no possible challenges in the 21st century. Call me from a positive point of view and pray for some of the challenges that may be to be solved in the 21st century. We need to have multiple groups of people in the market. We need to solve issues on the global agenda. And we need to be organized by the global system. And the global system needs to be organized so that it can be divided into different parts. The global agenda needs to have a strong international relationship. We need to have a strategic relationship. The new building needs to have a strategic relationship. We need to have a strategic relationship. The next step will be to organize the economy and to improve the economy. The economy needs to have a strategic relationship. We need to have a strategic relationship. And we have to be able to achieve the decisions we have made, as well as the decisions made by the group of refugees. And I am here with Gondman Yuga, who is in this chair. And the decisions there, as it is clear in the international arena, there is a problem. And these problems come from the idea that there is a return, a return to Abraham. But it does not happen on the ground. We have to establish a global foundation. And the international interests must have its roots. And it should not be the second issue. We have to establish a global moral foundation. And here we are talking about the security of the United Nations. And the government institutions. And we are also talking about human rights in the arena. And also the human obligations must be very important. And finally, we must, like this regime, be sincere and long-term, and not be able to behave in an extraordinary way. We must have the steps of the U.N. for the sake of the surprise of this vision and the point that we are facing now. We are here in this chair, in this chair. We have a clear vision of these issues. And we are here to make sure that we hear from these three important leaders in the world who have succeeded in entering the 21st century. Let me just give you the email. We have reached 40 percent of the youth. What is the solution to the other messages? How can we reduce the financial and economic crisis? These are examples of the messages that reach us. But we will now listen to the three leaders. Please continue to give me these messages. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Please continue to give me these messages. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. It is important for all of us to work with the government, the state, and its dear ones. It is important, according to what the Professor Schwab said, and this is essential for companies, governments, institutions, organizations other than the government, and many other groups around the world. Why is it important? If I look at the fundamental issues in economic policies, I think it is clear why the government's efforts have affected the whole country. We know that all of us are affected by the fact that we are not around the world. We know that the financial crisis in any country has affected all countries around the world. We have to build the fundamental strength of the global system, and we know that the investments in the renewable energy sources that many of the existing companies have with us, there is no experience in what we want. But it is not clear why, for the first time in 40 years, we have reached a commercial agreement. We also know that the fundamental goal for the future, but now we have a very short chance of achieving it. Why do we see that in our world, we are dependent on each other, and that the government has returned to the financial crisis. We have to put a light on the government, as most people do, and also on the financial ministry, and there is a kind of ministry that will succeed or fail. We may understand this reaction to any crisis, and there is a reaction. I remember that I participated in a meeting in Washington, and I was reading the international campaign against the world outside, and it was about the sense of protection that resulted from the crisis. We may also put a light on the change of the environment, and we say that we have not yet seen the opportunity of a group of foreign countries, and many of the other international organizations, but we have noticed that the problem is that the world is changing rapidly, and it has not yet reached a single country or economy to pay for the next world. For the last 10 years, the United Nations has been able to do that. After 10 years, we may be able to do that, but currently, we are in an economic phase, where most of the production is part of the world, and the consumption is another part of the world. If we do not think about the relationship between production and the future, there will be a relationship between them. Therefore, in this economic phase, cooperation is more important and necessary. We must all always need international cooperation, and we will not return to the level of support that we have set up, except for what happened, and it is necessary for China, the United Nations, and the humanitarian aid in all of this to reach international cooperation, and the government's market is considered to be 25 million jobs if we do not do that, and we also need a fundamental reform, where the international market is the fundamental part of the relationship, and other countries need to cooperate with other countries, including countries with 20 countries, and there must be more cooperation and cooperation with international organizations and countries, and there may be more international cooperation. We have decided to focus on this issue, and in this case, we will focus on any future problem, and we will focus on the local areas, and we will ask everyone why we have not learned the language in the past, and we will notice the importance of international cooperation, and I would like to invite all of you to take your seats, and to talk about the important changes in the policies of international cooperation and fundamental skills to support this offer, and also John Afkanadi said that these people who are drawing the present of the past lead us to think of the future and that you will draw the future. Before we move on to the past. Before we move on to Baskel and Alison, I would like to reach out to the people who come to us or to the international courts, to the local courts, this is a question. And to another comment on Twitter. How can we take this crime and clean it? The crime of government itself, the number of cases. And also, to turn the views and principles about the important issues. And Caroline, the problem of the children and the race in Africa, there are ten million women in Africa. It is impossible for me to find this opportunity, these comments. I have reached out to the young people who work in the state of Namiya. But this is the word for you. I would like to thank you first. I would like to start with a different person. And in my opinion, the problem is not that the regime is all failed and not successful. Partially, the global regime is successful in what is related to the transportation. For example, food, roads, medicines. These are things that the world has succeeded in. The national health center, the United Nations Foundation, all of them, or the UNDP, all of them have succeeded. It is not enough. So I will not tell you about this part of the regime. We are talking about another part. It is not related to the transportation of services or weapons, but the transportation of young people. In fact, this is the part that is not successful, not because of the economy. All of them are in the international community and financial sectors. Compared to the previous regime, compared to the financial sector, the markets, and the commercial operations. Why is this so? This is the point that I would like to highlight in this discussion. And it is not related to the regime, but to the existing regime and its institutions. And maybe it is very far from the example, but its design is not complete, but it is essential. Therefore, we do not have many tools and movements for the global regime. But the power that will move this movement, or will move this movement, is the political power, and the political power that will move it, is the rule. And those who have the legitimacy of the people, or the chosen rule, who are the leaders of these institutions, the part of legitimacy, this is the part that I think is one of the major problems. We do not have much left in the movement of the time, of the political power. Therefore, this is something that we understand, that there is a gap between the people, and there are many demands. And the economy does not have enough demands for the people, and the need for resources. The political power is the power that will move us, and this requires a lot of us to explain to the people that we have to do anything that we cannot do with our own efforts, but with the need for others to cooperate with us and achieve it. Sometimes, decisions and difficult steps are difficult. The main point here, at this point, is that we are now on a period in which the national energy sector and this situation will remain as long as the economic crisis remains. But the question is how do we get out of this situation and how do we find additional energy to be able to recover the energy that we have lost, and with this, as Zamili Gordon Brown did, I think that there needs to be other governments to provide this lost energy. It is the civil society, the organizations, and the groups that have the most power in the government. Maybe you are the example of hope for these countries. Maybe we will continue to hide the government and the market. Thank you, Pascal. And I see many of the ideas coming into your minds during the discussion. The institutions cannot be global in this context, so we need to get more information. How can we establish the happiness of trust from Mohamed Isis? And we move on to 54. How can we return the global power to global control? And is this possible to be separated? Here, for Gordon Brown, Jurian Ratid, he talks about the deaths and the governments. How can you listen to the conversation to address the challenges that the world faces? Pascal, you talked about the fundamental governments. You talked about the two previous conversations about the global challenge, but there is an important issue today, and it is the time for the international and the world to face more problems than possible and possible. And the answer is, we need to get the world to face more problems than possible. We are in a difficult time because we are in a situation where there are challenges, but we can't get rid of these solutions. The solution must be in the national interests, but the international solution must be in the local interests and in the national interests for all countries. So, the international agreements and the books must be agreed upon by the decisions taken by the government and by the local government. This is a difficult time because we need to take into consideration the issues of the world and the society. This is the most important issue of the public interest. In the next five years, there will be changes in the geographical, social, and economic forces and their transition to Asia, and the lack of comfort for the issue of reform of the Security Council by the international forces. The issue of the world's economic and economic forces is not only about the economy, but also about the change in the world of communication. In our lives, we have witnessed great developments. We have seen great improvements in the economy and in the world of communication. We have seen great improvements in the economy and in the world of communication. Thanks. And I also want to say that the international engagement is a very important issue and this is the most important aspect of the Arabian system which affects the economic and economic development and the human nature in Syria. But one of the most important aspects that we should consider is that this is the kind of development that takes a natural and religious role. And we talked about these distances. This could lead to dangerous consequences for the region and its economic crisis. The religious sectarian issue is an issue that we must be cautious about. The other issue is the threat of existence of the universe through the environmental system. I heard from the New York Times about the change in the environment. We must take steps that are sensitive to the environment without the need for other benefits. Lord, this chair does not represent the reality that we will talk about. It is a matter of the ability of a woman and the ability of a woman to be very important. The public has been affected by this. It is a proof of its importance. Here, the real issue of the environment is that it is a threat in front of the government that we cannot deal with. This is the main issue in front of government problems. It is not possible for a single woman to deal with a single mother or a single child. We must realize that this is the real issue. This is the main issue in a single issue. We must gather all the people around the table. The world economy is a great idea in order to discuss these issues that we are concerned about. We want to work together. This will lead us to more challenges. But if we want solutions, we must have international and national interests. I think this is the most important part of our society. We must talk about these issues for a minute. If we achieve this, we must be prepared for the future. We must be prepared for the future. We need to be prepared for the future. We want to see the world economy as a ally in these issues. Thank you. There is a real pressure. There is a strong pressure and some pressure on me. The next generation and I am aware of the importance of the special agenda for the future generation to have hope for the future. There are different opinions about international and international courts. I ask all of you to comment on this. We have agreed on a number of issues. We must realize that the world will increase its soil and nature. There are some fields that we can work on. But there are some fields like financial change, and the change of money, and the change of income, and the change of goals that need to be improved. This is related to our joint work. If the countries allow us to understand that there are limits to continue our work without the cooperation of the state, we will not be able to support these principles. If the United States does not understand that the future will be flourished by the cooperation of the state and that it is not able to meet some of the issues, then we will not support the cooperation of the state that we are talking about. We must talk about all of these issues. I expect from the U.S. leaders to talk about that. There are many good initiatives that have not been supported by the state and have not been brought to the appropriate financial sources. Why do we not have the support of the public institutions and the pressure groups to reach a goal for the future? I found this question. Why is there no additional cooperation for the financial crisis? Does this mean that the cooperation will be reversed? The answer is the opposite. Before that, there was a lot of work to be done to deal with the crisis, but with the support of the crisis and us, when there is any good news or good news about the crisis, we will not be able to cooperate with the state. Therefore, our politicians will benefit more from the pressure. This crisis will be solved locally and at the state level. Therefore, there was a reaction after that to the cooperation on the state level instead of the cooperation of the state. But the problem is more than a screen. It requires the cooperation of the state that we are talking about. I will give an example of a battle between the youth to this point. Maybe I will go back to that in a moment. There is something related to the shared goals, and after the comments on this topic, for example, I would like to mention the importance of the solution, but how can we take the decisions and take them to the questions? What are the opportunities to cooperate and to mention about the change of the management and other comments? Why are the institutions of the state not able to solve the problems of the state and the government? There is a different point about Gordon, although I agree with his first comment. My opinion is that during the financial crisis, there was a negative effect on the cooperation of the state instead of the cooperation of the state. I agree with Gordon that in the first phase of the crisis, there was a joint agreement on the price of the solution. This is not the most difficult thing for politicians, and everyone decided that they would open the field of financial, central and financial resources. This was accepted by some of the things I mentioned, because it was a short-term job, but it was not the most difficult thing for the government. There was also a positive solution at the beginning, but it was not the most difficult thing for the government. I agree with Gordon that the president of the British government supported this idea and was very proud of the position that the British government relied on for 20 years. However, it is true that when we have time to solve some problems, we have to make sure that we are able to overcome the national challenges in the implementation of the sanctions. There was no power for the government to do that. We were looking at the financial issues and the institutions that are still suffering from the difficulties in reaching the system, and I did not talk about what would happen if it was applied, and what would happen if it was not applied. I think that it is the opposite of what happened, and I completely agree that under these circumstances, the political pressure is coming to the local level. From here, the political legitimacy is coming, and the local political legitimacy must be applied. This is the main principle for our institutions, so that the government can be close to the people. I think that the global demand of the question that is asked is how can we translate these global issues and the state to the local level, and I think that the change in the economy and trade are among the examples, and when we notice that the end of the trade is coming to the people and the state, we can find support for these issues. I think that we have time to look at the economic limits between what is national, regional and state. So all the issues that you want to address are related to all these levels. There is no difference between the state and the country. The fact that it is not a state, it is a country for the other party or for another country. If we don't look at this, we notice that we have to look at the foreign world all the time, and unfortunately, this is the easiest in democratic politics. We look at the outside, and we look at the outside, and we consider that the problem is coming from the outside, and this is a very dangerous trend, and it leads to a very bad economic limit between what is a state and a country. And if we don't accept that the problem is itself being addressed to all levels, we will face the right direction to solve these problems. We also have to look at the short-term, and of course, if you are close to the elections, you have to be very important to us, but we have to stay away from that very soon, unless we are able to get a solution to this, and we may not be able to apply it to a good basis, but we have to apply it to ensure our safety. Some of the commentators say that the world has become a mess, and that we are trying to get a solution, because it seems like it is a national issue, and also Faizan Ouddin is asking, are the national interests being controlled by the international interests? This is the main issue around the world. I think that the youth will be able to reach it, and we will also work together with the press, and all of us believe that the national interests will remain the most important source. And if we want to have a solution, we will do so not only economically and internationally, but also through the press of the governments to solve the most important problems. And I would like to go back to the main issue that has affected the views that are being created on Twitter. It is clear that for the United States, you will not be able to achieve a quick goal because of the decisions, the agreements, and the restrictions on public agreements, and the inability of private institutions to look at this opportunity, and the United States is looking at increasing its restrictions to the outside world. This is also a stop in Europe that needs more restrictions to achieve a goal, but there is no other planet like Mars that can be controlled by it. Therefore, it is necessary to reach an agreement that is based on China, and that it will also be able to achieve a quick goal, and that it will also be able to open markets in India, and after that, we will be able to maintain our customers in the West. We need a state agreement for that, so we will not achieve that unless through the state agreement. And here I am going back to the point that has affected it. Pascal, there used to be a high level of international cooperation for different reasons, but we have reached that point. We have a new US administration, and I congratulate Obama on being able to look at the outside world, and we have a Chinese leadership that is close to it. It is necessary to see what the level of the state can achieve with the help of the state, and we are a strong agreement on the legal procedures we took to prevent financial crisis, and this will help us to advance forward, and we have no place to put the right rules that are not expected without that. Therefore, it is possible to advance in a hasty way based on economic background to show the importance of international cooperation, and it is in the interests of all countries around the world. I will give the floor to the women from the audience, so that you can raise your hand. I will give the floor to the women, because they are the best examples in our conversation, and there is also a comment that says that the participation of the women in all the issues that are related to the law needs to be renewed. And it seems that there is a comment from Julia if she was present, maybe she has a comment. You can go ahead. You yourself as well. Can you introduce yourself at the beginning? You can go ahead. Dalia from Poland, I thank you for recommending this case, and I think that I am in need of medium-term measures to speed up the development of women in Europe. We have an example, but it is not the new example that we can give in building the women's freedoms and their ability to hear their voice in all societies. Can you give us advice on what can be done to increase the number of women in this international institution and the participation in discussions and decisions? Is there any other participation? From the women in the audience, I would like you to introduce us to the participation. If you have any questions, I would like you to answer them. My name is Fisa Khartoum. I would like to ask you about the balance between the knowledge and respect for the national and local borders. I am from Darfur, Sudan, and this is an important issue for me because it is a local issue. I will take the next questions, and then I will hear from you. How is the participation and recognition of women in the international court? Mr. Pascal Lamy, I think that the issue is related to what all of us have to do to serve the local system. The majority of women in the society must participate in this. I don't think that the international organizations must have a specific system for women, or a quota. For example, if we have a job, and there are volunteers, we must have a balance between men and women. This is a family system, and it is not a specific system. We use it in our children, and I think that the work is complicated. You can try it out. It is a family system, and you can help. In the end, the issue is important for all of us to be honest in the way we think about it. The issue is important, and there are challenges in women's ability. There is progress, but there is more to be done. There is also the issue of women's independence, and we have to fight it at all levels. I was personally in the middle of a lot of arguments, and unfortunately I didn't see a woman in the other side of the different issues. The Security Council, the United Nations, has decided to give the woman a role in the middle class. I met a number of women in Sudan, and we participated in the negotiations in 2007. We tried to work in different sectors, and we study every aspect to achieve success in this field. Thank you. I now have a question from Pakistan. When you met a large number of women in Pakistan a few days ago, and I was there three years ago, and I noticed a huge difference between the civil society and women. Women in Africa, women are the ones who change Africa, because they do not accept the current system in the country that controls women from participating in these difficult decisions. There are legal and any other ways, but I would like to say that most children in schools have to be women, and therefore we have to reduce our burden. They are the ones who teach, so we will reduce our burden in the future that we want. There is the children's work, and the marriage of the children, and there was a lot of criticism about these first steps and the importance of their strong commitment in their demand for education. They are the ones who can achieve change. In 10 minutes, we will have the opportunity to change the policy in the courts. We will move on to three issues. First, we will talk about the global agenda, and how the international interests are affected by it. How do we overcome it? How do we strengthen cooperation? As for the previous question, what is the value of religion and the belief that there is a positive role in the promotion of these courts? Mr. Dlami, please. My answer today is to focus on the local sector. There are issues that are not related to international trade, and there are issues related to global trade. There is the rise in prices, and the global prices are rising. In addition, the government is suffering in keeping the prices of food at a lower price, and this is an addition to it. What does the government do to reduce the knowledge of the agricultural products? This does not include the level of the global trade, but the local level. The next issue I want to talk about is that I do not know much about the views of Islam, about the global courts, or the Jewish views on this issue. I am a Christian, so I know about Christianity. Here is the translation from the middle of the 19th century. In Christianity, there is the first Catholic Church and the 13th in the 19th century. And there is the social doctrine that the Church was calling for the so-called global legal authority. I say that it is true or not true, but it is a culture that exists in this direction. For Gordon Brown and Ian Larson, I think that they are all listening to the others. I agree with Pascal that the work is in progress now. The building must be completed by the citizens. The class is talking about the crisis in your neighborhood. Yes, there is a crisis there. And I admit that. And the public question is that what we are talking about today is that it must be implemented at the level of the people and the citizens. There is a matter of making sure that when we see these issues and the problems that we face, and we can deal with them as leaders, we will be able to make sure that these problems are solved. There is a work that must be done after determining the issues and the problems that must be made sure that the problem is solved, and the tocar and the finger we have created and the development of the building in 2015. This is a agenda that you need to talk about now and not just after two or three years. And our committee comes from the United Nations to say that this is what we agreed on earlier, but we decided to be king for the peoples and that What do you want the governments to do to support the people? Yes, there is a role for all of us, and what we are going to do with this discussion is to strengthen the people, if they do it at the level of partitions, or partitions, you want to achieve a change, and we are in every leader or religion or a beginning that we have heard about, which is about the responsibilities of the other parties, and the side of all the leaders of that, and these issues have created and contributed to all of these issues, and there is a story about the end of the Second World War, when a number of books, such as Rowa and others, and the Minister of Culture and others, talked about when they said that there was no moral value, so we must acknowledge the issue of the real value, how we establish our institutions, and strengthen them with a clear moral basis, and we study these distances, and this will take us to the conclusion that the trust between us depends on a national solution, and this is a message that I benefited from the last years. I am Saskia Sassan, I am going back to the issue of women. Some of the evidences that you refer to make sure that women form groups, women have groups, and men are better at asking questions. This is the foundation for women's groups in the rural areas of the world, and the rural areas of the world. I don't think that this makes sense because it is easier for women to participate than the United Nations to talk about this issue, to have a foundation for women's blood in different levels and different places, in a group of issues that we are dealing with. We are dealing with women's groups, and the economy of the world, and this is a big issue, and it is the issue of the management of the judges, and the control, and the relationship between the criminal and the criminal. Therefore, we need to be careful, and this is our topic today, the future of technology and the future of the countries. This is the issue. I fully agree with you on the role of women in your collaboration, and its impact, and how we control ourselves in the future. This is a very important role for women's blood, and it is said that you are wrong about the issue of men, and therefore it is good that we have the partners, but we have to realize that the opportunities that are in the middle of the community must be used in a way that has not yet been achieved in our history. I think that they have raised their hands, but I would like to take three or four questions. This is a good question. I think that the problem today is that the countries of the West, the United States, and Japan are more than the countries of the nation, because the countries of the nation are at a time of conflict, and therefore the local challenges are high, and the most important example of this, as we know, is China. India, South Africa, Mexico, New Zealand, and it is the countries that quickly change the economy, you must apply it to change political and social changes. The simple answer to this question is that the countries of the nation that are at a time of quick change are in need of a lot of political energy to reach its destination. This is a good question. I think that the countries of the nation that are at a time of conflict I would like to say that the way to deal with the State Bank is a new issue. So we can and the State Bank will agree on a number of steps. We need to deal with other institutions, especially the private sector, and the public sector to be a protected sector. We need to think about the We have a great deal of cooperation and cooperation between us. Without that, we must consider peace. There is no economy without peace. And the issue of human rights and respect for human rights is an important issue. This is an important issue. If someone is weak, all the buildings will become weak. We have to remove the barriers between these countries. Gordon Brown has entered the last. Many of these issues are related to what we cannot do, but I invite you to think about what we can do. Don't think about the euro as a weak point, but the need for international cooperation is the benefit of our journey. Don't look at the gaps between the financial institutions and politicians in the last few years. Rather, we must preserve more cooperation and strengthen the institutions. At the same time, we must think about being a group in our countries as good friends to demand from our governments to have a bigger role in the world economy. Therefore, this is our way of security, to stop our governments from taking the necessary steps. Another thing is that the next session cannot be from three speakers. Thank you. Some of you are probably from ... I would like to thank the panel. Thank you.