 It is the most wonderful week of the year because the Thanksgiving slate is just two days away almost from right now A kickoff is set for 12 30 p.m. Eastern for that opening game We're gonna break down all three of the Thanksgiving games get you set for them from a DFS perspective And hopefully get you some money to pay off the hefty grocery bills for this week This is the heat check fantasy podcast powered by Number fire that's right here on the fan dual podcast network and number fire calm My name is Jim saw this. I am a senior writer and analyst for number fire calm joined here as always by Brandon Gadoula he is the senior managing editor of number fire calm Brandon happy Thanksgiving ish to you How you doing today? Yeah, happy Thanksgiving to use It's a It's a busy day For sure we have We're in the middle of the I guess I'll just stick with the the Amanski. We're right in the middle You know we had a pod yesterday recapping stuff. I've a pod tomorrow looking ahead to the main slate You know other sports don't stop. We got basketball World Cup. So it's a it's basically never ending but it's really hard to To be You know negative whenever we get an extra three game slate You know we have other three game slates, but none of them are quite like the Thanksgiving slate They're really not because they're so spread out you get to kind of digest things literally and figuratively as the day goes along I think this year. It's a tough slate in a good way where you got to make some tough decisions You got to kind of dig deep on some guys try to identify I have a scrubs to consider list which is I don't know it seems not fun But like we're gonna break down guys We like each game get you a read on the overall slate on Fandall Hopefully give you an overall overview of this slate in just one segment first as Brandon mentioned back to back to back Podcasts here on the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed week 11 recap one up yesterday and tomorrow will have our week 1212 main slate breakdown for the Sunday slate that'll be up tomorrow and also live on the Fandall YouTube page at noon Eastern so if you're watching there and you want to watch again tomorrow That's it noon Eastern for the main slate breakdown and up on the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed after that So go search for the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed Wherever you get your podcast and if you like what you hear leave us a rating and review as well Football fans make this a thanksgiving to remember with Fandall America's number one sports book because when you bet an NFL Same game parlay from now through November 28th, which is a week from today yesterday All customers can get a up to $1,000 in free bets win or lose Just bet an NFL same game parlay or same game parlay plus of at least $20 the bigger your bet the more you'll get back in free bets NFL same game parlays are the perfect way to combine your bets for a chance at a larger payday Build your own or choose from one of the popular SGPs pre-built for you in the Fandall top rated sportsbook app However, you want to play get up to $1,000 in free bets win or lose When you bet an NFL same game parlay of four legs or more make every moment more with Fandall an official sports betting partner The NFL must be 21 plus in select states bonus issued as non withdrawal of free bets that expire in seven days after a seat Max free bet $100 Restrictions applies see terms at sportsbook.fandall.com gambling problem call 1-800 gambler or visit fandall.com slash RG and Arizona 100 X step protects an exceptify 3-3-4-2 in Connecticut 1-888-789-7777 or visit ccpd.org slash chat in Indiana 1-809 with it in Kansas 1-105-2-2-4700 or KS gambling health calm But it is also 105 to 2400 for Wyoming as well in Louisiana 1-877-770 stop in New York 1-877-8 hope and wire text open Y in Tennessee call the red line at 1-889-979 or in West Virginia 1-800 gambler net Now we'll go game by game here in a second but first let's go through Overall small slate strategy because this is a three game slate typically we're breaking down a full slate of 1011 12 Etc games. This is very different. So Brandon for you when you are looking at a shorter slate How does your mindset shift for that versus when you're building out a full slate lineup? So for a full slate lineup we talk all the time about having mistake erasers And and making sure that every single player in our lineups Can help us overcome whenever we do inevitably get players wrong that's not really possible on a smaller slate and While I think in the past especially for the even on these smaller slates I've tried to make sure that I really limited my punt plays You know guys who can't help me make up mistakes It has to depend on the entire slate because there are a few guys who can Be the mistake by not playing specifically Josh Allen comes to mind is you know You might like your lineup if you go down to Dak prep all your lineups If you go down to Dak Prescott and all of them and you don't get up to Josh Allen therefore, you're not playing any guys who may or may not you know run 30% of the routes or something but if Allen does take advantage of a match up against One of the worst defenses in the NFL There's no coming back from that. There's just not enough points unless someone you know one of the other five quarterbacks Kind of goes berserk so basically I'm trying to think of Think of it as in not like making sure I have access to the guys with ceilings and Not so much like avoiding that this the scrubs a little bit Yeah, you you said the the key thing there at the beginning We think all the time about mistake erasers because we want the guys who have Ceilings and stuff like that and I do still want mistake erasers I want guys who can do the Josh Allen and you know go for 35 points I want those guys on my team but I think that what you were saying was we need to make some constellations to get there and On a full slate you're typically not making too many constellations like you can get you can justify having ups a path Upside for all all the players in your lineup That's that might not be the case here now I built out on Monday built out a lineup where I went the lowest I could go at every single position a lowest I could justify like if this were a full slate the lowest I could just find every position That lineup could not get to Josh Allen a quarterback Which means that if I want to use Josh Allen, I have to bend the rules and that's okay like that's fine that is Something that is fully justifiable. I could get there if I went receiver in the flex or tight end the flex But I couldn't get there with running back in the flex so being more open to Not flexing what I think is the strongest position on this site, which is running back. I'd be receptive to that I have to be receptive to guys who don't have the most obvious ceiling or don't have Just because like you're not gonna need 18 points out of all three wide receivers to Feast on this slate so I have to be I have to to open the player pool the guys I wouldn't typically consider just because I need access to the guys who can be mistake erasers and I can't get there for all those guys Just by limiting myself to guys who have a what we consider to be a typically viable Yeah, part of why I trout off at the end is because I didn't want to say What you said before the show started which is basically redefining What a ceiling is for this slate right so I kept I couldn't get that out of my head I didn't want to say the thing that you said, but I think that was a very apt way to put it is You know it only takes one is a bad as a bad thought process for a main slate. It only takes one is Probably fine for these guys on a three game slate and I will say like you know, I Made that lineup that I was talking about where it was the lowest echo at each spot There are there is a list of guys I can use who didn't make that lineup who were lower salaried and like I'm fine with these guys Do I feel great about them? No, but like it's a list of one two three four five six seven guys I can turn to and feel okay about it and if I've got seven guys, you know limit my exposure to all of them I don't want to be super super Exposed to any of them personally But just kind of you know keeping in mind, you know that there are options if I want to get access to Josh Allen say Kwam Barkley Stefan Diggs all those guys if I want to get there I have to take some constellations But I will be doing that here. We did get a question over on YouTube from Theo Theo is asking if you're all in on a player. Does that mean you're over 50% exposure? So this is a different discussion for a short slate than it is for a full slate because I mean the answer is yes for both Because like we've had times where we've had almost a hundred percent of certain guys like Tony Pollard without Zeke that one week Like we'll go above 50% pretty pretty often for running back specifically at least for me So yeah, especially in a three game slate though, you're gonna have to be comfortable with higher exposure to Were you gonna say something? Sorry, you lagged on my end. Sorry. I thought you want to say something else Well, it depends on it's it all comes down to risk tolerance Yeah, and it depends on how many liners you're playing if you're playing like five lineups I think that if you're going away from a hundred percent on guys, it's you're doing yourself a bit of a disservice because you're just Minimizing the opportunities that you're gonna hit the right combo Give yourself five darts as you assume that you get or Mondra Stevenson correct or Dalvin cook give yourself five darts as opposed to three or four. Yeah, so I Used to play more lineups and I play You know fewer lineups I will play a hundred percent of guys especially on this slate, but thinking ahead to like the main slate for example I think I'm probably gonna play a hundred percent Antonio Gibson because I think a salary is too low Across let's let's just ballpark like 10 to 20 lineups I think that even then you still want to maximize the chance Or at least I do I want to maximize the chance that if if that person has a huge game that I benefit because they can very easily Feel like you're chasing something if you have sprinkles of everyone And then you're like I like this guy more, but I was kind of wanted to diversify, but it just yet It also just makes it less likely you'll get the right combination. Yeah, and like that's that's what's most important to me so When you're going a hundred percent lock button on a person or close to that That's not where you want to go like the dusty dudes to consider That's not the list you want to be on you want to be on okay? I assume I I've got this guy who I think is super under salary I love Devin Singletary at a salary So I will lock him in because he has a path to a good meeting expectation But also a good ceiling he fits both those checkboxes those are the kind of guys you want to build around and then use the rotational like the Others to consider as being the more rotational pieces to help you pinpoint the one who happens to be right there Yeah, I think you could also apply that to like Josh Allen This week or sake on Barclay like I'm not doing that for Alan or Barclay, but you can I'm just saying honestly like this You look at the quarterbacks. You're like, you know, Dax gonna be okay But there's no way Kirk Cousins, Jerry Goff, Daniel Jones or Mac Jones like put up huge games And yeah, there's no way that I foresee Josh Allen Oskar and 35 on the Lions You're not saying that you're saying that hypothetically I'm saying hypothetically because Look we're gonna say what we think about the slate in these matchups and I have range of outcome numbers, but like, you know Whenever you take a stand So in that example like you're saying I'm just gonna play Josh Allen My lineups are gonna be a little bit difficult to fill out the rest of the way But then, you know, you have 100% Josh Allen. He does go off. You can lock that in in terms of the probability Then you're like the the value plays you're sort of rotating in all you kind of need to do is have one or two of those guys who hits And so you're basically just just okay anyone who went like once think about it Pull up like some sort of coin flip analyzer or something like that and like lock in the probability that you know One player or like one coin flip is the result you're thinking of And check out how that changes the probability of the next coin flips is not all just coin flips, but like Probability changes so much whenever you have a few constants rather than the right, you know all all the unknowns Right exactly and I think that's kind of the overall thought process here But we'll go through like player level analysis But the overall like thought process of shifting your mentality is important for this kind of slate roster building exposure stuff like that That's important, but let's now go game by game and break down the Thanksgiving game starting off with the bills at the Alliance right now The spread that game is not enough points the bills are favored not surprisingly there Total is 53 and a half injuries note here. Jeff Acuta mispractice for the Lions on Monday He's a cushion protocol. He left early on Sunday I'm not sure if he has time to get out of protocol if he actually suffered a concussion. So Probably assuming a cuda is that that's a pretty big loss of the Lions secondary there DJ Chark limited in practice with his ankle injury Josh Reynolds did not practice due to a back injury Those are the key ones for the bills and the Lions Brandon when you look at this game from the top down What stands out to you from a DFS perspective? I think the thing you can't really get around is Josh Allen and how you're viewing him relative to the rest of the quarterbacks so I run range of outcome simulations and My data has it about 55% likely that Josh Allen is the QB one the highest score in quarterback on the slate I'll bump that down even just say 50-50. So it's basically Allen versus the field Of course, the thing we have talked about that one is the salary if you come for salary and look at from look at it from a Value standpoint, he's still about 30% likely to be the best value at quarterback You then have to apply of what that does the rest of your lineup because you're allocating so much salary To Josh Allen, but for example, you know, you want to pivot to Jerry Goffin in this game He's under 5% likely to lead the slate in Fandall points among quarterbacks. So That's I really think that there's no way we can't talk about Allen first really dig in and figure out where we want our exposures to be I Know I threw out the hypothetical. I'm not gonna go 100% Josh Allen this week I'm definitely though not completely fading Josh Allen because I'm a bit of a coward in that regard And I don't want to be rooting against Josh Allen. Who's basically You know him versus the field to be the best QB On the slate. Yeah, so I mentioned again the lineup that I built lowest Consideration guide each position that one couldn't get to Josh Allen so if I'm using Josh Allen, I have to make consolation somewhere and That's not a super comfortable feeling I think that to me my like if I have one lineup Allen will most likely not be in there because I want to give myself higher probability swipes at other positions, you know If I can build the lineup where I'm not changing my ceiling aspirations Without using Josh Allen, then I'm okay doing that I think that DAC is fully justifiable Daniel Jones because he runs as much as he does as a path to a ceiling as well Not gonna talk about the rest I considered talking about the other side of this game decided against it in real time I did bet the line's money line though. So I'm the true fool here. Yeah, I know I Think that if I have one lineup Josh Allen is unlikely to be in it now with that said I think that Thanksgiving three game slates in general are great spots to play single entry and let's say I'm in I Decide to play three different single entry lineups. I might have two Josh Allen ones there If I have one though, it's probably not gonna be Allen So I think if you give me 10 lineups probably going half Josh Allen or so Somewhere around there just because of I want to I like your simulations not to flatter you But I want to lean on the math and allow that to give me like a guiding light To show where my Josh Allen exposure should be so it should probably be I think Some of between 30 to 50 percent is most likely where I'll wind up That's probably gonna be even with the field and I'm okay with that personally because I think that I can get a better read On the rest of the slate and that's okay. I can differentiate elsewhere So I'm okay being even with the field on Josh Allen If I have one lineup probably not but I'll probably be 30 to 50 percent overall Josh Allen Yeah, so basically think of every line up. You're not playing Josh Allen is basically a bet against Allen going completely Bananas and putting up like 35 or more It is also though a bet on the the small Segment of the pie where a Dak Prescott puts a 35 and matches him That's not not a huge chunk of the probability, but it is in there Yes, but I'm talking like That that's specifically if you're playing Dak like I'm I'm kind of more talking about if you're if you're going to the other guys the other four Because unsurprisingly we like Allen, you know in a vacuum number one Dak number two at salary. I think we're both leaning Dak just because it really helps out. Yeah But if you're not What I'm getting as if you're playing like Jerry Goff or Kirk cousins like They're not going to score more than 25 points. It's just not what they do So unless you think that no, okay Not cousins cousins is we'll talk about that later, but I'm not there Yeah, so that that's why like you can't really talk about Josh Allen Just talk about the matchup and she's like, oh, well, let's play. It's like what does that do to the rest of the lineup? So I think I'm gonna be about 40 to 50 percent Allen Spoiler alert, I'll probably be about 40 to 50 percent Dak and if I have anything left over Probably just gonna go Daniel Jones, but that's you know Allen is I think the most crucial talking point of the week And the one thing I think that that is pushing me potentially closer to the 30 end of the range of outcomes than 50 percent Is the fact that bills have been more rush heavy recently We talked about this in the Monday recap But in the two games since Josh Allen's elbow elbow injury their early on first half pass rate was 58 percent in week 10 Or 48 percent week 10 52 percent week 11 it was 67 percent Before the Allen elbow injury. So they've been more run heavy Recently than they were in the past which does influence my view of uh, Devin Singletary, but also does decrease At least a tiny bit the odds that Josh Allen goes completely bananas Also very weird travel schedule. They flew to Detroit on saturday flew back on sunday Then I'll fly back to Detroit again on wednesday And it's an early game. This is the earliest game on the slate. That's a really tough schedule I think that's that's part of why about the lines, but also like Um, that's a difficult thing to overcome and kind of increases the variance in their potential performance. So The path to a disappointment is now larger. I think it's not huge, but it's larger than it was before So if I had to guess if I had to sell like an over under for exposure for Josh Allen for me 38 and a half Probably somewhere around there because I think that by the time I'm building lineups on Wednesday night thursday morning I'll be skewing a bit more towards DAC Because of salary because of other stuff impacting Allen's range of outcomes Yeah, I'm with you. Uh, it's it's one of those spots where Allen we know is is going to be a good process based play especially against this Defense that's not going to surprise anybody, but it really comes down to thinking through like, you know building five lineups 10 lineups What are you doing with allen? Um, and you know It's that that's that's why I love this slate. It's not just talk about the matchups because we all know what the matchups are by week 12 Um, it's just like how likely is allen to completely erupt By comparison so I think we're both about, you know in the same range. Let's just call it 40 ish percent and simplify it 38 and a half. I'm sticking with it. Um, let's talk about the like I would say the guy On this slate I might like the most at any position. Uh, which is weird for me That's uh devon single terry single terry the single digits nickname is now temporarily unpaused it might come back but uh single terry with the Increased reliance on the rush of the bills. That's a good thing for him. 18 carries this past week 13 week before that Still getting some work in the passing game Not a huge contributor there, but also a lot of red zone work last week nine red zone chances for single terry The most he's had this year by three his first time above a 36 red zone share. So good involvement there 6900 dollars could be a situation where there's kind of like a get out of town With a win and that could lead to more single terry as well Single terry comes in 6900 dollars. He's the cover boy for the youtube version of this show For today, so I've come full circle on dead and single terry. We are back to being a pro devon single terry podcast for the time being I think that if I to bet uh my highest exposure player by the end of uh Well, I had a building process probably going to be single terry. What's your read on him? What do you think like 67 for single terry for you? I'm going to put the over under at 83.5 Okay Yeah, since week six when he saw his role kind of changed a bit 76 snap rate 60 route rate 20.4 adjusted opportunities per game, which is carries plus double your targets I'm good red zone share as you talked about but one thing that I noted In that split is that he's getting an opportunity on 35 percent of his snaps Whereas before that split so weeks one through five 29 percent Uh, it's still not an amazing number, but yeah single terry plays snaps And part of the reason why I was like trying to be on him early in the season is because he's playing snaps He just wasn't getting as much work. We're now seeing the snap rate not necessarily change too much Uh, but him, you know that he's getting the ball more and it makes sense because Alan's not a hundred percent Uh, they can run the ball a little bit. Uh, they should be able to run the ball plenty You know in this match up if you go through his game log and look at, you know, his outputs He had the 19.6 point game back against miami Um, but the past two even when things were like have been basically the best 15.2 and 16.7 Fandal points with three touchdowns in that span Usually we look at that on a main slate and be like he can't really hurt me By putting up 15 in this spot even at 6900 If he puts up 15 and 6900 he has a good shot of making the optimal lineup this week So that's a perfect example. I think of uh Reconsidering the way that we're looking at the slate. There are just only so many guys who can really really put up massive outcomes So we don't need it as much from single terry. So I think he's going to be one of uh He might be the guy that I have the most of but there is someone else in the late game who might rival it Okay, I think I know you're talking about and I think I agree with what you're saying there as well Let's talk about the wide receivers on the bills the side of things stefan digs $9,300. That's high Gabe davis comes in at 72. Then you have a zea mckenzie. His snap rate's been pretty disappointing. I would say Um, his salary is 52. Khalil Shakir not getting enough snaps for me to be super enthused there So and then dawson knocks at tight end comes in at $5,500 Looking at the gains they played with uh dawson knocks and gave davis healthy Stefan digs 28 target share gave is 17 percent. Knox is at 12 percent digs 42 of the deep targets 24 in the red zone gave it 31 deep 15 percent in the red zone Knox has a 15 percent red zone share as well across those games now. Knox's role has been getting a little bit better recently A couple more targets. He's $5,500. I prefer Dalton Schultz over him by a pretty significant margin Knox is in play my question for you is Can you get to allen and digs without filling out a lineup you hate? Uh I'll try it quickly, but probably not. So I have right now Josh allen stafan digs I had the vikings defense at 4 000 in there and then uh devon singletary 69 I have 60 60 left for a running back to receivers a tight end in a flex I'm gonna have to punt In multiple positions there So that does mean that a that allen digs lineups will be pretty They'll be tougher to get to it's a good thing if you want lower roster rates, but also That lineups going to be thin. Uh, what's your read on that combination specifically? Yeah, that's a difficult one. Um That should lead to A pretty unique lineup because if you plug in I I have the giant's defense in here Uh, but if you add remandre stephenson, who's the guy I think contends with singletary is one of the You know best plays at salary on the slate at 72 So you're basically taking the the two sort of lowest salary featured backs on the slate Um with allen digs you you still need two receivers a tight end in a flex for 5900 on average It's doable it's going to be tight. Um, and you're going to need again That's the kind of lineup you build based on the the And I'm surprised you haven't said this yet, but telling yourself a narrative of how games will play out Yeah, you say allen and digs are just gonna they're gonna go in they're gonna, you know wreck stuff and leave um And that you know, you can tell yourself giants cowboys divisional game could be ugly Dallas is no stranger to sometimes making games A bit harder than they they need to be um And then there's a lot of reasons you could dislike The night game and so You say, okay, I don't there's not going to be big games from other other matchups. So I don't really need to Build around other players, but that's going to be very difficult to get to Um, so I probably won't have very many if any of those stacks uh, I will say that We've seen last week Davis knocks and digs all run at least 86 percent of their routes only single terrier at 55 percent Was above 30 percent so it's been those three guys mckenzie 48 percent So I don't really think this is a one where we can get too deep I think you could maybe roll a dice on mckenzie, but probably not going to risk it with anyone outside of those bills That I just mentioned. Yeah, I didn't have any of them. Am I scroll this to consider a list? Um, they were not in there. Uh, I think I agree that you where I'll probably wind up being Lower on the digs allen combination than most and just kind of hoping that digs Doesn't do enough to bury me for not using him. He could like I know that I know that going in he has the ability to torch me But I have to be okay with that. Um, you know What are the odds he hangs 30 on me and makes it impossible for me to make up that ground? non negligible Definitely like there is a path to 30 for him there But I kind of would rather Bet against that than bet on it when it does require me so Wild else worth in my lineup Davis is a lot easier to get to 72 which means they'll probably be more popular than digs. Um, but He also is a guy who can be a mistake eraser He can be a guy who gets that 30 points as well It's higher odds for digs, but davis can do that too. So I think I Will wind up with more davis just because of salaries $2,100 lower salaried It's probably just going to be the most the most common route, but it's just so hard To justify punting at two or three spots. I can justify punting in one spot to get me to alan Punting in two or three spots using guys who don't have good range of outcomes don't have a path to like 10 points Even that's a lot tough for me to justify than doing so at one spot Yeah, I've digs about 32 to leave the slate and fandal points But about 11 percent to be the best value at receiver Which is third behind gave davis and uh, CD lamp who leads Um, but yeah, I mean receivers always kind of spread out if you look at actual true range of outcomes there So Yeah, there's a chance that digs puts up 30. I have about 20 percent to put up 25 around 30. Yes I'll listen here. 25 is good enough. Yeah um So, yeah, I mean my question to you is How much is how much of a priority is to fund digs in linux where you're not putting josh alan? Not huge. Um, because they're so tied together. Um, yeah Like if if digs goes for 30 josh alan should be your quarterback is kind of my mindset on that. Um, so I'm probably I think the overall take was I'll just be low runs to von digs and I probably should be but also then the field Yeah, I'm probably with you there. Okay. Let's talk about the Detroit side of things here. Um, we talked about knocks briefly I think he's he's in play below shaltz, but it viable a tight end So on my scrubs to consider list, there are two guys on the lion side Obsedingly deandre swift counts a scrub to consider because he is below The range I'd want to consider at running back He's fine. He's 6200 like that's a low salary He's not playing a ton of snaps, but he's still getting targets Which means he has a path to a decent game. He had four red zone chance on sunday I'm I don't want to be on him because I think people are too optimistic that his role will change and I don't think it really will Um, but like he's still getting high leverage touches and that's a path to a decent game The other one is cliff reymond who you have talked up before and I poo pooed But i'm open to it honestly like this in the games they play without tj hawkinson 18 percent target share for relief reymond 33 percent of the deep targets in those games A moderate st. Brown is at 38 percent overall and 44 percent deep. So he's a very good play At his salary, but reymond coming in 5300 dollars. I think of my list of guys Who I typically wouldn't want to consider but might have to here I would say cliff reymond is probably the one i'm most receptive to it's either him or kj osborne I think are probably the two i'm most receptive to on that list so Reymond decently likely a punting option when I go with josh allen I'm okay with swift. I'd like to avoid it if I can but out of necessity I might need to get there and then amon ross st. Brown coming in at 76 Would love to get there as often as I can just a question of how often I can based on value What's read on the lion side here? Uh, basically the same, uh, and then we got to talk About jamal worms just briefly you can I think we I think people want to know our thoughts on jamal. Williams, but I don't think they do they might think they do I don't think they do so swift, um Since he came back on week eight, you know, just about a 32 snap share, but A good one of those sort of a little bit misleading snap rates where he's getting decent opportunities on a per snap basis about 45 43 percent for him So when he's out there, he's out there for a purpose Uh, he did have a good red zone roll last week as you talked about um I think that 30 yards in a touchdown, uh, could be enough at his salary to to get us through I think that he's a A more viable play than the overall data looks like perfect example of someone We would not touch on the main slate, but it's very much in play On this slate. I think amon ross st. Brown is So to stand out 38 percent target share in three games since the hawkinson trade Um, almost 50 percent of the air yards 38 percent weighted target share if I count for downfield And red zone targets as well. Uh, eventually he's got a score I think that he can score this week, especially after getting so close So many times last week. I want to make sure that I'm an overweight on st Brown I feel like he's the kind of guy who can put up 24, uh, even in this matchup and just feel like I needed to have him early on in the day. Well, that's part of the appeal for me with Dropping down from alan to dak or someone else is that it makes it a lot easier to do amon ross st. Brown and I think the gap between amon ross st. Brown and the 6,000 range of wide receiver. I I like derrius layton. I think he's totally fine. I like mo kay with michael gallup Um, I'm okay, which could be meyers And i'm okay with gave davis, but the gap between amon ross st. Brown and them is huge so I want to get there and increase my exposure to him via Not being as high on josh alan, which doesn't feel good, but I think that's a worthwhile tradeoff here Yeah, I think so, you know, we know digs and justin jefferson have slate altering upside Uh, cd lamb and all maron ross st. Brown also have that. They're just less likely to get there. They're salaried as such um But this is I think one just one of those situations where digs and jefferson have been good. So their salaries are about at their peak Um, lamb's been, you know, good, uh, st. Brown hasn't scored in Ages, uh, so his salary is towards towards the low end, but you know, and then I'd throw gave davis in there Someone who can obviously break the slate. Yeah, but those five Pretty much unmatched in terms of that and we're getting I would say Discounts on lamb, but especially st. Brown in that record. So I might be most overweight So basically my percentage versus, you know, the the public on st. Brown Because I just want to be there whenever he has a big game because it's definitely within that range of outcomes for him Where is raymond for you among the punting options? Uh, he's probably toward the top because I don't see how they don't have to throw extra here. Um He's at a an 18 target share Since the hawkinson trade I think that that's again, not necessarily good enough for main slate, but I'll take that in a game where there should be passing volume The yardage upsides a bit muted hasn't gotten over 76, but also hasn't scored yet this season. So If he gets me nine, you know, if he goes for 76 and three or four catches at 5500 like That can be enough Yeah, I think that's where I'm at as well is there is enough there to feel okay about it. So I'm fine with him We'll use him. I know that for sure probably highest of my the value list a tight ends for the lions I think you're just kind of betting on Hawkinson shulks and knocks not doing anything because I can't reasonably expect a lot of Brock Wright Played a lot of snaps, but not a ton of routes think about a 50% route rates in their most recent game Um 46 percent since the hawkinson trade 77% snap rate though. So a lot of pass blocking there Yeah, and that's not five percent target share. Yeah, you know Yeah, I don't feel great about the other guys either. So he's definitely scoring He could score and still not be great though relative to like salary Sure so Especially when like shulks and hawkinson are actually like legit viable tight ends on main slates Um any golf for you or no? No Probably not for me either It obviously depends on how many lines I'm playing but let's let's just Simplify it say like 20 I don't think I get the jerry golf. Okay. Any final thoughts for you on this game? Any Juma Williams for you? Oh shoot. I forgot about him. Um yes, because He actually has a role. Um I talked about how I bet the lion's money line I clearly think there's a non-zero chance they win this game and that would lead to He's probably going to contribute if they do win. So if I assume the lions win Which my model has happening You know decent amount of time relative to the odds of plus 360 um He'll probably be involved in the games. He's played with swift back 70 yards to 20 per game That's just a little bit below devon singletary at 77 per game from week three on when his that's what I have is his most relevant sample for him and very good red zen role for jamaul williams but No passing even involvement that hurts his path to a ceiling. Um There's not a lot of yards outside there. So Limited and if I wind up lower on him, I'm gonna be very okay. I would prefer to be lower on him than the field I think it's my overall takeaway. I think he's dependent on game stacks He's dependent on me assuming the lions win. I think more so than even game stacks and The odds of that are even even if I did take their money line. It's not super high It was just higher than plus 360. So, you know, that's where I'm at there. Any final thoughts for you in this game? I think that's it. Okay. Let's move now to the second game That is the giants at the cowboys right now cowboys nine and a half point favorites The total is 44 and a half couple injury notes here Wanda Robinson done for the year of the torn acl That is a bummer richie james also missed practice monday with a knee injury for the giants micah parson's expected to play But did sit out practice on monday due to a knee injury He injured it on sunday for a turn the next series even though that game was Done by that points. Uh, impending bar didn't practice because of a hamstring injury That's held them out the past two games that they did move parson's back to being a pass rusher Despite bar not playing last week, which was a deviation from what they did the previous week so Bar might not be as big of a factor as I thought he was going into that vikings game, but still it's going to monitor for sure on the Cowboy side of things overall view for you of giants at cowboys probably my favorite game to stack It's obviously between this one and the one we just talked about but I think it's a little bit more stackable because of dak press god's salary. It's also I would say a two quarterback game where we consider both of these guys Uh, and probably the only three quarterbacks that I'll consider uh Realistically with with dak jones and josh allen. So I think it's my favorite one to stack up. Uh, we have a few Different pass catchers we can go to with dak obviously cd lamb dollon schultz the preferences but michael gallup Noah brown probably One of the guys who i'm really targeting as a I'm gonna play enough dak where I should probably have some know a brown because his rolls He runs a he runs routes and again It only takes one. Uh, he can he's I think he's good as well. So yeah, it's fine. I think I'll have uh A decent amount of know a brown. That's not to say like 30 but like Like 10 to 15 percent because again my my lineups Above and out leaf ramond I'd go ramond over. I would buy a bit, but I think they're in the same tier. Yeah Brown this one I was so I was like Thinking about know a brown. I was like, okay I am okay with michael gallup if i'm okay with gallop realistic. I should be okay to know a brown too um There's not that big of a difference like brown led the team in targets and dax first came back missed a game due to injury Came back didn't do a lot in his first game back, but then It's most recent week earned a couple of targets We know the game was basically had a hand right away there The 42 yards in that game That's you know, that's that's fine for this late. So I would prefer ramond, but I think that brown is up there For sure. Okay with him in this situation I think the dak will probably want to be my highest exposure quarterback for this week For the reasons you mentioned just because the salary is good You know, I think this this game is fine Pretty good match up for the cowboys the Giants defense ranks 26 against the pass early downs 26 against the russian early downs as well They're a very good late down team like their late down success rate is great because wink martin dale is a psycho um their defensive coordinator, so That's a positive thing, but it's not going to be enough to scare me out of going towards the dalas offense here so Like gallop a lot or sorry. I like dak a lot I'm okay with gallop I'll probably wind up more than I should that's an evergreen statement from michael gallop. Yeah um But I do want to intentionally limit stuff He hasn't had the best year in terms of like on field play. I think that impacts things Let's talk about the backfield uh, tony pollard. We saw him in his first game Playing alongside zeke since they kind of figured out that pollard was the guy In that game pollard snap rate was above 60 percent. I believe each of the first three quarters So if I'm projecting a snap rate for pollard, I'm probably sitting around 60 percent or so And I'm kind of expecting an erin jones type role now erin jones at $8,500 against the giants is Maybe a little bit over salaried potentially. It's very dependent on efficiency to get by but like ceiling game obviously well well within his range of outcomes so I would say to me I'm probably going to wind up being a bit under on pollard. It's not because I expect zeke to suddenly have this huge role uh, but it's because I don't know. I just think that uh The salary is high. There are alternatives He's going to come in very popular So I think that because everyone else will be very enthusiastic there I'm going to wind up being underway despite not really wanting to be there What's your read on the backfield and you could talk about zeke too Yeah, I think pollard, uh a bit over salaried. It's one of those spots where it's like Okay, we can get seikwan at 88 or tony pollard 85 on a main slate. No question It's it's seikwan every time three games like you're accounting more for variance and like maybe seikwan doesn't do a whole lot Also a really tough spot. I know the cowboys rush defense is not great But like their defense overall is very very good and the giants offense is banged up Yeah, so like you got to account for for that. Um it's it's hard with pollard because I think erin jones is a great comp uh, maybe erin jones I guess like with jamal williams in the past erin jones had better quarterback play But i'm saying Where I i'm not as concerned about erin jones in the red zone anymore. I used to be more concerned about him in the red zone Uh, I still think that ezekiel that will be involved in the red zone. He I don't care like You can look like yours per carry, but yours per carry is not a great stat for efficiency Zeke's played well He played well on sunday like his success rate numbers are good He gets like what he needs to do and he's was involved in the red zone What do you have? He has a valuable role in this team and that's fine. So like this is uh It's a spot where like zeke could score twice pollard could have 100 yards, but not score And that's gonna be tough at 85 because Probably need a little bit more uh than like 100 yards from scrimmage But I will have pollard and stacks. I think that a pollard and and dak stack is something that people won't do enough of Yeah, so I think that's probably my main exposure route to pollard is actually stacking him with dak in hopes for the the receiving touchdowns again, but I have a hard time playing Like ranking pollard in the same tier as barkley. Where is zeke compared to jamal williams for you? Not Not as high because with williams. He should still see them I guess we'll see about a similar snap rate. Maybe like 40 But they're in the same tier, right? Yeah, I think so. I think no one's gonna want to play zeke And people don't want to play jamal williams if you look at just week 11 when zeke sat for the entire like second half almost because they were up by 90 Um, he had 15 carries and one target in the games jamal williams had played since since switch came back 16.8 carries per game in 0.8 targets. It's kind of the same role Yeah, and like jamal doesn't have a lot of yardage upside neither the zeke They both had I mean zeke had a 36 red zone share in week 11 And I'm guessing jamal williams Roster rate will be triple zekes almost Probably somewhere in there as you have sentiment currently With williams coming off a multi touchdown game. Exactly. Everyone want to use pollard. Nobody likes zeke anymore, right? If I'm going to use a dusty Rush only running back. I might be more inclined to use zeke So I wouldn't be shocked if I wind up being even on them, but as a result Relative to the field, I'll wind up being higher on zeke than jamal. So I think that's where I'll be Yeah, I'll say this much. Uh, you laid out the the workloads If you just take a step back from like Who the names are and you look at the workloads and say, okay one guy's on a team with a I'm probably the total of 26 and a half the others on Team within piecing total of 22 The guy with the higher in pie team total is an 8.5 point favorite. Um at home versus Not the best defense and then you have someone the other guy nine and a half point underdog like Zeke probably makes more sense to play Yeah, which is weird. Um, I like both of them a lot less than singletary a lot less than remandre So they're more rotational plays But I think I'd rather get to zeke than jamal all things considered get especially compared to sentiment Neither guy in the cash game though. I want to make that Uh, very clear some of the giant side here danie dimes, uh, we think in 20 percent Because of the rushing for him. Uh, what do you think? Yeah, I think I think So I basically simplified and said 40 alon 40 dak And the other 20 would go to daniel jones, uh because of the rushing ability Um, he has three games against top 12 pass defenses Not the best passing numbers, but still rushes pretty well 38 yards in those games on six carries um Like i'm I don't know how he's not the third qb play The other guys are just pocket passers With no rushing ability. Um And some of them not even great matchups. So I think that Jones is gonna be the other 20 percent Yep, um, I will be there as well on him. Zeke while in barkley comes in $8,800 Um, and his his most often samples the entire season. Um, but in that time 29.5 just opportunities per game 116.3 yards from scrimmage per game 38 red zone share those are all very good numbers. I think the issue I'll run into is What you were saying with jamal williams where the game environment is not ideal pretty big underdogs Um, facing a really tough defense that should play well Um, sake one salary is very high So if I had to choose for one lineup between getting up to sake one and Probably sacrificing a monra st. Brown realistically Uh at wide receiver I'd rather get to st. Brown And settle for dalvin cook or mondry sievenson devon singletary Then force in sake one that could be a mistake. Um, but for one lineup I think i've been sake one very similar to josh allen where I want to get there But realistically if I have to lop them off just to make that sacrifice to get better options elsewhere. I'm okay with that Um, so I want to get to 30 40 percent somewhere if I can But he will not be my highest exposure player at this position. Uh, what about you? What's your gonna take one? Yeah, just a difficult spot. Um, I started running like environment game environment scores. Um, this is Just barely better than what the choice getting So and it's just sort of an outlier like the one the one great matchup belongs to devon singletary among running backs. So Yeah matchup from a like environment perspective that should itself like the Like the rush defense matchup is pretty good for sake one. Uh, the cowboys 21st against the rush newly downs Um, so and dalvin ran really well against them But the problem is you can't run if you're getting dusted and that's well within the range of outcomes So the match of itself, I don't mind. It's more so like what you were saying the environment itself is really difficult. Yeah, um So I think I'm with you. I want to get I I need to have at least one share And that's probably the bad thing to say but like yeah, I need I think in case a quant does a sake one thing Puts up on which he very much can do. Yeah, because I mean He's very good. We've seen christian and calf every time and time again put up big games and Spots work shouldn't there's no business being good. So One lineup. Are you more likely I'm not using either. I'm thinking one lineup But are you more likely to get to alan or sake one? Alan due to the predictability that he could put up a huge game in the much much better environment for him to do that I agree. Let's talk about the wide receivers here for the giants. No wandale robinson in this one Not sure for richie james. I was kind of surprised. He didn't practice on monday In the two games they played with No wandale and without, uh, tony or sterling shepherd dairy slain 23 target share, uh, richie james 13 they had daniel bellinger at that time and I think marcus johnson was still running routes. He's been his role has been cut back Isiah Hodgins has been kind of the guy who stepped in in place of Others and beginning more work I think Hodgins is honestly, I think he's like A half step below khalif ramund and noah brown Like he's okay, but dairy slain gets a lot of deep work. Um, he's been good on the deep work He does have a massive 50 target share in that two game sample that's on 2d throws sake one barkley also has a 50 deep share in that time so, you know, that's Shows you what that's worth. Uh, but I think that slain totally fine to 64. I Am probably gonna have to actively try to reduce my exposure to him just because he's in a range I'll want to be in. Yeah, I do want to actively reduce my exposure to him because there are a lot of paths to failure He does fit very well and that's kind of the issue. Um, what's your read on slayton and then on? Um, I'd say a Hodgins Slayton, I like I think I'm with you where I need to make sure I don't have too much 48 percent area would share in this two games you referenced 3.10 yards per route run, which is a really good rate What's he up for the full season In yards per route run. Yeah Uh, one sec I have him at 2.46 sweet So you like that, um player he's good Uh, what downhill work there there will be and thankfully all these games are enough wind concerns in these games. That's sick. Awesome. Um But yeah, slayton in a single lineup. He's gonna be in it. There's really no way around that. Yeah Hodgins, I think I'd have him a full tier below Raymond and brown I don't love I don't love this game that much. Yeah To sort of bump him up To that extent plus again, I like I like dana jones. I like him primarily do the rushing I don't really anticipate like a 350 yard game from him passing. He has not really taken advantage of any situations with Elite passing work relative to expectations. So I'm gonna have him a bit lower I wouldn't write him off in the lineups where I stacked jones, but I think that I think Hodgins would be game stacks only Like with with jones. Yeah Yeah, you're probably right because like I'll have a lot of lines where I don't punt at all and that means in the 30 to 40 percent of lines where I do punt I'll probably want to focus more so on Brown focus on cleave ramond. Maybe deandre swift stuff like that. Um, again calling him a punt is so offensive and upsetting Here's we are. Uh, the tight ends for the giants. We talked about lauren's cager On monday. He's a receiver on fan duel. He's on the practice squad He's been called up three consecutive games Which means they have to sign him to the active roster to make him active for this game But they just signed nick vannette off the saints practice squad And I think that means he has to be on their active roster for three or four games now um Well in the 53 man, not the active roster So i'm not sure if kager will get promoted to the active roster I don't know what their tight end situation is so i'm just going to avoid it Any other thoughts for you on the giants or on this game in the whole? Uh, no, I think we covered, uh Oh doles and schultz. Uh, I think doles and schultz is the best I didn't plan this late Above yeah higgy hawkinson I would agree. Okay Uh, all right, let's move on then to the night game. That is the patriots at the vikings right now Spread in this game is the vikings by two and a half Total is 42 and a half for this game The reason the spread is tight is because vikings left tackle christian derisaw expected to sit in this one Due to a concussion he had a concussion in week 10 came back week 11 got another concussion. So No chance he plays in this one Patriots center david andrew is also going to sit because of a thigh injury So both offenses banged up, but I think these The two running backs here is still pretty viable. I think the offensive line injuries and the defenses make it where I'm not going to touch either quarterback. Not even going to consider them personally. What's the read on this game overall? I like remandre and dalvin cook a lot Like the patriots have such a good defense that I don't envision Any way that kirk cousins correct bounces back and puts up 25 or 30 correct. Uh, I Love justin jefferson since since the hawk like since gating hawkinson Still a 29 target share 46 percent air yard share And they throw a d more often too which aids that And makes that air yard share more important the one The one thing that I have as a note regarding that is that the the patriots were 31st and 8 out allowed And they haven't been efficient at defending those downfield passes. So there is a path for for jefferson to you know Ruin all the all the lineups you think are doing great Uh before that game he can ruin it, but I would imagine that the patriots find ways to limit him because there's not a whole lot else to worry about Yeah, like like dalvin's good hawkinson's good But if you're trying to key in on someone it's it's going to be jefferson. So So he's playing through turf toe right now. Uh, he played through it last week Uh, he practiced I believe in full on monday as well Does that impact your view of him at all knowing that he's not at full health at the moment? It lowers the the fear of the big game So You'd pick between sake one and jefferson. Who do you pick? sake one I think I do too, but That's tough. I guess maybe Is is a flex sake one If not for a flex probably jefferson just for opportunity cost Okay, that's fair. Um, he also flows a receiver slot, which is good because I think that the lower salary. Yeah, that's what I meant by opportunity. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Um Yeah, I think that the the patriots eight out has been high all year Um, that's something I've been thinking about a lot They've gotten bailed out by some wind at times which has helped to kind of mask that a bit playing indoors here Uh, if it weren't for derisaw Being banged up. I might be higher on jefferson But it doesn't that doesn't help at all. The reason I like dalv, uh, the patriots are gettable on the ground That doesn't always show up because like they played a lot of teams that are bad on the ground Like the jets without breeze hall cannot run the football at all dalv Has played five games with a snap scheme back up 15 carriers per game 3.8 targets per game Those numbers are a bit muted because he left the game early in week 11 because everyone did because it was over Uh, but his role has been pretty good and his production. He's looked good as well so dalv Like I think that my like baseline lineup is going to be Single terry remandre and dalv All three of those guys because they I think are all under salaried honestly and get me good Bankable production with a very obvious path to upside So that's why I like dalv. Uh, what about him and then you can start in stevens if you want to Yeah, just uh for for dalv one of the best roles, uh For really any running back and he's a good football player. Um About 73 of the snaps on the year the the red zone role could be a bit better um But you can live with the imperfections because you only have so many guys to pick from uh for this week, but yeah, I think that Uh, dalv at salaried probably third for me behind single terry in remandre. I think so too Um, but I agree with you every time I every time I start to build like, okay. What's my main line? I'm gonna be I'm having a hard time going away from those guys. Yeah so I'm I'm there with uh with dalv and the reason that I like remandre is Since remandre like took over but in games with theming here is actually playing remandre still have has a 70 snap rate 63 route rate. Um and a lot of targets I'm at 7.3 targets per game in that span. Um 47 red zone opportunity share. So not just rushes, but um The targets as well. So This team doesn't really have anyone else to go to jacobi mires is like a solid target share On games with mac jones back. He's at 27 but remandre's at 24. Yeah So I We love single terry. I think that if I could really only pick one between single terry and remandre I'd probably go remandre just due to the the actual opportunity being better Yeah, the hard part is the offensive expectations are quite different I think that's why I'd go devon single terry over remandre But I think they're very much in the same tier and probably my two highest exposure players on the slate um you mentioned remandres target share the sample I have is there five games with tyquan thorton and davante parker being active jacobi mires leads with a 23 target share 33 deep and 24 in the red zone But stevenson's that 21 percent overall and 24 inside the red zone stupid stupid stupid role in a good way. Um Like that's absurd for a running back. So The vikings rush team has has been very good overall so far this year I don't care though because i'm not using him for his running abilities I think the vikings rushing skills more so impact dame in harris harris didn't play He's 64 to dollars and The odds he outscores de andre swift are pretty high um Like his past five healthy games 57 yards in scrimmage per game switches at 32 percent or 32 yards per game since he came back um Harris is a higher red zone share than swift and each guy's most relevant sample So I'd rather go harris than swift honestly because I think the odds that he gets me Two touchdowns are higher like if I assume the patriots win which they can with no derisaw Harris is more he is like decent likely to be involved. So yeah, there's also an there's an inherent cap on what de andre swift can do yeah Because they want to play like yet like it is hard to score points in the sidelines Which is true for harris too. It's snapper was like 25 last week So but like even even like god forbid jamal williams gets hurt, right? They're not gonna give they're gonna give justin jackson the ball man so Yeah, boy that hurts Because swift's probably my favorite running back relative to like consensus every week Harris is one of the guys that like less than consensus whenever he's relevant. So that that hurts, but Um, I think it's a good point Any like john oosmith or like any dart throws I don't think I can use any patriots outside of myers and Stevenson and maybe harris because they rotate everyone like avante parker came back last week and played a 40 snap rates That's why parker parker is like the most viable guy there, but he doesn't like there's rotating like Yeah, it's difficult. I mean the salaries are low for a reason, but Look, you got to embrace risk on a three game slate. I don't know if that's the right kind of risk to embrace Yeah, especially with guys With much more like much stickier route rates one name here on my I'm gonna call them low salary guys Who I I consider What's that dumpster dives? No, no, it's like diners drive-ins and dives. No um, kga Osborne about 87 percent route rate since the Hawkinson trade A 14 target share We know we can get downfield work and if we're playing like the angle of you know You had four downfield targets in the buffalo game. Yeah, so I think that he might honestly be He's in the same tier as Raymond and Noah brown for me. Yeah. Yeah, he might be He might be well, I don't know if I like the game enough to put him number one there, but It's I think they're all the same. I just I might just go even like on all of them Like try to because Taylor to like the who else is in your lineup for those guys Yeah, well that would mean I'd have no Osborne because I'm not gonna build around this game, um, but No, but I'm the same like if you have if you already have Oh, if I have like a monorail already don't don't play don't play Noah brown. I got you. That's fair. Um Yeah, I think that Osborne's right in their tier. I agree with you where Very very similar if I had a rank I so One thing to consider with khalif raman is a dj's heart came back last week and didn't have a full roll Does he ramp up this week? Maybe, um Would it be at the expense of um Would it be at the expense of khalif raman or would it be at the expense of tom kennedy? He ran 10 routes This past week. I don't know so Maybe I should go osborne one brown two Raymond three I don't know. I think they're all the same honestly. Yeah. Yeah, it's Again, I think it's no it depends but it depends like because there's a there's a real chance to play dak Schultz and like either cd lamb or Yeah, you know pollard or something. Yeah You can be a little bit weird with your stacks. I'm gonna have much more of like the double stack You know two pass catchers with my quarterback normal. I'm not going three So like that kind of stuff all matters. Yeah, I think that's uh, correct. Okay I'm trying to think there's anything else to note on this game hawkinson felon Yeah, so hawkinson. Uh, look at the games that played with hawkinson. He has a 24 target share 16 deep Which is actually a decent number of like raw deep targets in those games 33 percent inside the red zone uh felon 15 percent with 20 deep, which is weird Uh, 11 percent in the red zone. He's still getting some work in like the Our downfield He's $5900. Um He was initially on my scrubs to consider list, but then I realized that he was actually higher sour than gallops I kind of had to cross him off there He's probably the same as gallop realistically though. Yeah, so I should probably be higher on him than I am Yeah I I think though at the savings I might just take gg osborne over the island over felon potentially I don't know Yeah, I'd rather just kind of get the better I mean dealings got good juice is better juice on those targets than it seems but He doesn't have juice the targets have juice. Yeah, yeah, that's not he used to have juice. He doesn't he's old. Um Yeah, I think that hawkinson To me I'd rather say the $500 on schultz But if I need I need to get off schultz eventually And I'd rather get up get up to hawkinson then go down to knocks all things considered personally The hard part is I won't play either of these quarterbacks So just lessens the chance that I will be on hawkinson I'll be there more whenever I like play dak with noa brown and just you know Obviously, I want to play schultz with dak as well But you know if I'm going different different paths, then I'll be open to hawkinson a little bit more, but I can have even I won't have curt cousins stacks this week. Yeah. No, I'm not getting there um If christian derisaw makes a miraculous recovery, maybe but probably not even then I don't think I'll uh Be getting there at all. Okay. Any final thoughts for you on this game specifically? I think we I think we covered it Okay, any final thoughts for you on the three game? Thanks giving slate before we send off the good people to fill out their lineups Uh, not not that anything can happen, but a lot of stuff can happen especially in a game like football if you think that you know we're too low on mac jones and That like you want to take the savings and and build around the other guys I forgot to mention the vikings defense is my favorite defense in the slates because of Affore mentioned quarterback. I'm just saying like I don't I would send zach wilson a christmas card by the way He got off real real clean when he took 18 sacks in that game I know he had a high completion percentage, but his qbr was like Six points above wilson's he should send zach wilson a christmas card Yeah, but again, it's it's one of those spots I don't say that as like you should always listen to us on main slates, but be a little bit like You can always think differently as ever. It's fine. I I still think that there are three quarterbacks In play and you get a little bit weird with your pass catchers Rather than your quarterbacks I grew that And we I'd rather go weird at receiver two than a running back. Um Yeah, I think that's all we got So that's all we have for today We're back once again tomorrow to break down the week 12 main slate Get that by watching live over on the fangirl youtube page noon eastern there on the fangirl youtube page Streaming there and then also up on the number fire daily fantasy podcast feed after the fact For that one and all of your other podcast needs Brandon if people have questions for you on twitter, where can they find you there? I'm on twitter at goodwill 13 gd ULA 13 and I am on twitter at jim sonnis j i m s a n n e s You can also follow the fan dual podcast network at fan dual podcast big Thank you to everyone for tuning in have a fantastic and safe Thanksgiving We'll talk to you once again tomorrow to break down the week 12 main slate. This has been the heat shack fantasy podcast powered by number fire