 你 Everywhere there is a round character So, we can see the mutations are these disorders are animal. Okay. These are the uses of Mendelian genetics. You know Mendelian genetics. All the process do not follow Mendelian genetics. There are few process which do not follow Mendelian genetics also. Okay. Follow Mendelian genetics. It's Mendelian genetics. Next we'll see few exceptions from Mendelian genetics are incomplete dominance, allelism, complete dominance, co-dominance, multiple allelism, geotropy, quantitative inheritance. How does that end? These are the exceptions from Mendelian genetics. Complete dominance, co-dominance, multiple allelism, geotropy and quantitative inheritance, sub-process. There was no clue how he had found. There was no, there was an invention of his DNA which is genetic. What is happening inside the cell? It was not known. He just had done it randomly. But this and his co-workers, then he invented or he discovered the Mendelian laws and Mendelian genetics and they have changed few things. Okay. There comes all these problems. When they have done Mendelian genetics, they found these problems. Complete dominance, co-dominance, multiple allelism, geotropy and quantitative inheritance. These were the problems. He discovered quite an incomplete dominance. Mendel, Mendel's first law, as Mendel's first law. What is that law? After some co-workers, what dominance we are having? What is this as Mendel's first law? One character will mask the effect of the other character. The dominant character will suffer in the sub-process, the excessive character. So that is what co-dominance states. But what is incomplete dominance? I will just first show you across. Then let us see what is incomplete dominance. Okay. Now I am taking the shape of the seed as a character. I am taking the smaller and smaller. I am taking the smaller. So is the dominant character a unique character? No. No. Because art is dominant. It should be without time. It must be without according to Mendel. Art is unique. Neither art. It was neither art, nor thinking. It was in between. The intermediate character was born. The intermediate character was born. The characters are but the dominant bird is not showing its complete dominance. It is not suffering the complete in-kill character. It is a character. Okay. I will take one more example. You will understand it very well. Okay. I will take colour of the flower. Okay. Here are the details. This is the red colour. Okay. This is the green example. Flower. And white flower. It should be red light. The red colour should be red. And yellow colour was completely dominant. It is not completely dominant in the middle. It was not red or white. It was in between. That is why we call this as in-complete dominance. Okay. Here what is in-complete dominance? The dominant Ali will not show its complete effect on the entity only. It will show its effect. It will not suffer any effect. Okay. It will be easy for you to understand. Take the colour of the flower as red and white. You will get a different generation pink colour. So here this is red. This is pink. This is also pink. And this is white. Should we take the pionific ratio and white? In the ratio of one is in-complete dominance. The dominant red is not completely massive in the effect of red. It is separate in-complete. The dominant Ali is showing the effect in-complete on the red. That is why this is called as in-complete dominance. Here what is in-complete? Okay. What was the second difference only showing in-complete effect on the red. But here two Ali's are showing both the characters. We have two Ali's. We have to know red grouping or red grouping or red grouping as an example. Okay. It is having different factors on it. Like I, A, I, B. This is for A, B, and zero times here I, A, I, B, I, B, I, B, I, B, zero times Ali and I, I, B, numbers A, B, B or I, B, I, I, I, I, O, I, A, I, B, I, B, I, O, I, B, are the same thing. But this is different only withdramatic. This was not easily I, I, I, B this is shown in the I, A, I, B, this is showing both. Here , a and b are the dominant genes , a and b are the dominant genes and o is explosion. So now, when a & o are parts together, the dominant genes which vote B or I have been there will only show if o is an explosion or is with the the Like it sir, mutually understood and one is giving, share them, one is giving. The same is here, they are mutually understood. And both affected in this college. Go with this. Please feel excited.