Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Jun 11, 2019
[the full time-code for this video is located below]
My reaction to a discussion between Jordan Peterson and Stephen Hicks, author of EXPLAINING POSTMODERNISM, throughout which I offer commentary/criticism in which I seek to elucidate the aspects of Postmodernism either misunderstood or ignored by either or both scholars. The original video, located at the Peterson YouTube channel, is called "Stephen Hicks: Postmodernism: Reprise."
00:00 In this video I explore my sense of the essence of first-wave Postmodernism 01:15 Is Postmodernism a monolithic movement? 02:13 How does it serve Peterson and Hicks to portray it as such? 02:51 Which group of people is most critical of Hicks's book, Explaining Postmodernism? 03:46 Peterson asks Hicks to define the "tricky" term Postmodernism. 04:54 Before trying to define "Postmodernism," Hicks points out the difficulty of doing so. 05:16 My take on the paradox of insisting on "Postmodernism" to yield a definition. 05:51 Hicks: before you can define Postmodernism you have to define modernism. 05:59 My take on what I see as Hicks's mistranslation of the English prefix post. 06:23 Hicks misidentifies the Modernism that Postmodernism is referring to. 07:16 Me: Hicks should be focusing instead on this other manifestation of it. 10:12 Peterson interrups Hicks to confuse Modernism with Rationalism. 10:48 I explain why this is wrong. I go deeper into the spirit of Modernism. 13:53 Again, Peterson confuses Modernism with Rationalism. I get into it again. 14:56 Peterson goes even further, labels his Age-of-Reason Modernism a "movement" 15:51 Peterson inadvertently uses the "we're better off now" argument against himself 16:30 Hicks inadvertently uses the "judge philosophies by their fruits" argument against himself 17:08 My take on Lyotard's notion of skepticism toward metanarratives 18:31 I correct Hicks's Peterson-like confusion between Modernism and Rationalism 19:25 I correct Hicks's mischaracterization of Postmodernism as nihilistic 20:50 Why Peterson is wrong in his dismissal of Derrida as a "trickster." 22:12 Hicks: "Who writes the dictionaries?" Wrong question. What is the right one? 22:33 Peterson shows his Postmodernist chops, does his best impression of Derrida. 23:07 Peterson accuses Postmodernism of smuggling in "a Nietzschean power-striving"! 23:54 The desperation mounts: Nietzsche is a Marxist! 24:04 Hicks doesn't want us to be "skeptical about any sort of a knowledge claim." 24:36 Hicks confuses superficiality with subjectivity 24:47 Me: Postmodernism sees the Newtonian paradigm not as subjective but as superficial 25:17 The paradoxically life-affirming spirit of Existentialism, (first-wave Post)modernism 26:31 Hicks's antidote to Postmodern nihilism: advocacy of "advancing genuine values in the world" 27:29 Hicks echoes Peterson's notion of Nietzsche as a later manifestation of Marx vis-a-vis power 27:50 Peterson wants to blame everything on Marx despite portraying his beloved Nietzsche as neo-Marxist!