 future directions related to the terrorism. There are normally, which are mainly considered, the two perspectives about the future of terrorism and future related on the basis on the actions and the aims of terrorist activities. One view that is mainly recognized in academia that is given by the optimistic views of black and he has the perspective that the emerging innovations in technology and communication is narrowing the social distances among different cultures. So the making of diverse social attitudes, it is now various due to the modern communication and means of technologies. Now it is not limited to any social behavior or social pattern that it will be fixed there. So if communication and technological developments continue to happen at this rate, then the anger and hatred will not be limited to any society. People's behavior according to black, people's behavior will not be specified on the basis of areas. In fact, the developments in it will bring new trends in it. Such pessimistic views of enders and sendlers, they think that there will always be weaker parties in the governments due to presence of grievances which will compel them to carry on their terrorist activities. So in such sense, government will be unable to effectively coordinate their anti-terrorist policies. According to them, they have presented their perspective specifically in 2006. After experiencing the 9-11 incident and the war on terror, the experts of this field, they have their own perspectives. They think that it is not possible in the world that the existence of weaker parties will end. That is to say, if communication with the speedy people's interaction has increased, but it is not that the world will not be weak, or it will only be strong, or it will not increase its dominance, then until it is between the weak and the powerful, it will be difficult for the governments to tackle their activities. And in these two situations, terrorist activities will also exist. So the future direction for researching and studying terrorism must be kept on lines of comparative approach. Because we will have to see what developments are happening in the world, and permanently we will have to design a comparison if we want to understand the future dimensions of terrorism and specifically how and what type of terrorist activities the terrorists are planning. We do not have to see what communication is in the world. We do not have to see what is the weaker and powerful nature of relationship is. We have to understand the mindsets of terrorists. Their aims, objectives, and what type of strategies they can of in the future. We have to study all of them. And to study all of them, the most important thing is that there must be a separate categorization and combating mechanism of those who attack their own territories or foreign interests lying in their own territory. We have to see how people can attack their own people, whether they have foreign elements on their backs that convince them to attack their own territory and their own people. We have to understand that mindset as well. And then along with that, we have to see how modern technologies are coming. So all of these developments have to follow them and stop them. What steps will the governments take? Along with that, those sub-activities who are not limited in their own areas, in their own territories, to manage all of them, what steps will the society and the government take? That is, it is important to identify terrorists and their aims and objectives. And then we have to see who is mobilizing them for such type of anti-society and anti-state activities.