 Thanks Kimberly. Can you hear me? I can hear you just fine. Thanks Susie. Yay signing off or tuning out. Good morning Karen. Should we check your sound? Good morning Karen. I think I might have missed you the first time. I wanted to offer to check your sound. Unmute instead of holding it. Well, we had to there for a moment. No, but it it says it's temporarily unmuted so I need to figure out it's not working if I click on it. I'm gonna go out and come back in. Okay sounds good. Okay Karen, I have a prompt that says ask to unmute. I'm gonna go ahead and choose that. I think it's because I already made you a panelist the first time you entered. So let's see what happens when I go that prompt. Right now it shows you muted. Okay. There you go. So I did it didn't have to do alt A, but at least I figured that out so. Okay. So how are you Kimberley? I'm doing very well. How are you Susie? I see you down there somewhere. So are you back to the office Kimberley? No, we're still basically remote. Yeah, I'm in the office a couple days a week. Good. Good to see you Susie. Nice to see you too Karen. Thanks for being here this morning. Oh, you're welcome. So Akash is joining us as a audience member. Okay, got it. And he and I talked a little bit about the meeting yesterday, so I think he's up for the next one. Okay, great. And do we expect members of the public or any of the neighbors gonna come for? Yes, probably a few. Okay. We've got a few already. Okay. Kimberley, I'm having, I don't see the names of the participants, so I'm not going to know if somebody's raising their hands. So to speak under public comments, could you help me with that? Certainly. You know what? Let me just check to make sure. I want to try something. I'm gonna put you as an attendee and then put you back as a panelist to hopefully reset that. Okay. Let's try that real quick. Okay. You may see some prompts, but let's just try. There we go. We should have you back and your sounding camera look like they're working. Okay, I don't see anything. Okay, I'll keep an eye on that for you. No, I mean, I don't even see you guys. Are you, because your participants should have two different groups, one as attendees and one as panelists. Yeah, no, I don't. My screen's completely blank. Karen, that happened to me at one point and I had, I had shut it off by clicking. There's a view, there should be a view up in the right hand corner. If you hover up there. Okay. You know, I don't, I'm going to go out and come back again. I'm sorry. So Karen, it shows muted. I can send a prompt if you think that would help. There you go. Okay. Are you still having a hard time seeing the participants? Yeah, I am. So if you could just help me with that, that would be great. Okay. Is that okay, Kimberly? Absolutely. Okay, great. And then we probably, it's 904, so we probably should get started if everybody's ready. Okay. We do have a raised hand from one of the attendees. Should I put the agenda back up? Yeah, actually, aren't we waiting for Carol and are we waiting for Carol? No, we have Adam and Susie. And then we have a couple other staff as attendees. But I thought, is this Carol, one of the voters? Yeah. I'm sorry, it's Gabe. Gabe will be acting on both Carol and Jesus's behalf for both of the items today. Okay. Does he, and there he is coming on screen. Yeah, yeah. He was, he was an attendee. I wasn't sure if he was going to be an applicant or an attendee. There he is. Okay. So I think, yeah, if you don't mind putting the agenda back up, Kimberly, and getting us started. So can I just go ahead and start the meeting now? Absolutely. Okay. Good morning, everybody. I'd like to call to order the April 20. Okay. Everything's frozen on my end. It might buffer a little bit, but you're still with us. Okay. Thank you. So please let me know, Kimberly, if I'm not. Sure. So I'd like to call to order the April 28th meeting of the subdivision committee and make the following statements due to the provisions of the governor's executive orders and 25. Ash 20, which should spend certain requirements of the Brown act and the order of the health officer of the county of Sonoma to shelter in place to minimize the spread of COVID-19. The subdivision committee will be conducting today's meeting in a virtual setting using zoom webinar committee chair and staff are participating from remote locations and or practicing appropriate social distancing. Members of the public may view and listen to the meeting as noted on the city's website and as noted on the agenda. Members of the public wishing to speak during public comment or during our public hearing items will be able to do so by raising their hand in the zoom meeting and will be given the ability to address the committee. And right now I'd like to open the public comment period. And this is the time for comments or anything that is not on the agenda. If you wish to make a comment, please choose the raised hand on zoom. Make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so. If you are dialing in via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand. Kimberly, are there any, is there any members of the public with that have their hands raised. We do have a couple of raised hands, but I think it would be good to remind everybody that this period of public comment is reserved for items that are not on the agenda. If you wish to make a comment during an agenda item, that time will come later that time for public comment will come later for items that are on this agenda, but this public comment is items not on the agenda. Thank you. Thank you. So, as Kimberly indicated if you have comments for items that are on the agenda you will have that opportunity later on in the meeting so if you raised your hand in inadvertently please lower it this time so we can see if there are any members of the public who wish to speak on non agenda items. So we do have one raise hand. Curtis Milliman. Okay. Mr. Milliman you should have a prompt. There you go. Am I being heard. Yes, you are. And just as a reminder this is for items not on the agenda. Correct I just wanted to make sure that I can see and hear you perfectly. Okay, thank you. Was was that it. Yes. Okay, thank you. Okay, so if there are no other comments, I will close the public comment period and river it back to the agenda. We have two items today the first item is 3.1, and it is the orange. It is 3552 Barnes road and Ms Murray, you have this item. Thank you very much I'm trying to figure out how to share my screen. There we go found it. Can you all confirm that you can see my screen. I cannot. If you can't, most people can't. Shoot. Try it once more, because it took a moment for me to take that other screen down. Okay. Okay. Now can you see it. Yeah, you just want to click it into presentation. Yeah, I have to do that after I'm up and running. Okay. Can you see it in presentation mode. Thank you. So the project before us today is the Barnes road subdivision and is a tentative parcel map. The property site is located at 3552 Barnes road. The proposed subdivision would result in three additional parcels it would subdivide into one parcel into four. And if approved and developed with residential units would represent about 15% of our. I'm sorry, not 15% point one 5% of our are required housing allotments from the regional for the regional housing needs allocation. So, again, the project proposes to subdivide a point five four acre parcel it's about a half an acre and individual lots ranging in size from four seven 4,793 square feet to 900 9,043 square feet. So the architecture is is not proposed, nor is it required to be for small lot subdivision, but the project has been conditioned for future development to comply with the development standards pursuant to zoning code section 2042 point one four provides all of those development standards for small lot subdivisions and the required entitlements include a conditional use permit and tentative parcel map. The conditional use permit has to be approved prior to the acting on the parcel map and was approved on April 22. So here's an aerial of the site and it's, I'm going to say semi current state, this photograph is from our GIS. And this is from a couple of years ago. This is a neighborhood context map my graphic I'm so sorry, it doesn't say a lot there are you can't see a lot, but what you can see is that it is surrounded on all sides by similar residential development. Yeah, a lot of small lots, as well as standard. The designation came in. In December 2019 and it has been delayed significantly because of coven. Let's see the associated here I mentioned it again the associated conditional use permit was approved last week. And zoning the land use general plan land use designation is low density residential and that's shown in the graphic on the left that yellow color represents low density residential and the zoning is consistent with that land use designation it's r16 for single family residential development. In that graphic what you can see the kind of the green cross hatching indicates that that is residential PD or plan development zoning districts. The pink area represents actually small lot areas that have been designated for small lot development. And then on the left side of Walter road down in the lower left hand corner. These are just r16 which are standard residential single family residential zoning district, but it appears to me that those are also small lot, judging by the size of the parcels. So, the project is required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act. CEQA, the acronym, and it has been found in compliance with CEQA as infill development a categorical assumption and under a streamlining measure also because it's consistent with the general plan. Here's a picture of the tentative parcel map I have. And this is this is a very busy graphic, they all are. I wanted to get it up here what you can see is that it basically separates. Let's see, can I, this is this will be the remaining parcel here, and then three more parcels these three are all the same size at that, you know, almost 4800 square feet. And this remaining parcel is the larger one that's 9000 square feet. Here's a conceptual site plan, which shows that the intent here is to develop the sites with detached single family residential development. Again, it'll be required to comply with the development standards and for small subdivision. I think the staff's review, no issues were raised. And so there are no pending issues. The public comments we did receive three emails, I had one telephone conversation with one of the people who sent the emails. And just to summarize those comments, they were concerned about property damage that may be caused by increased traffic and that's both during the construction period and with the new residential development. The air quality and noise due to the increased development there was concern about exhaust from new residents. And as well, I think during construction, the loss of property value and I'm just going to say that no evidence has been provided that there would be a loss of property value. Certainly not an expert but this isn't something that we generally consider in our review, because and especially here where the land use designation is for exactly this kind of development. There's a lot of safety due to the new street and increased density so there was concern about people being able to access the backyard fences with the new street running adjacent to them. Again, this area is designated for this type of development. And we can certainly discuss that more increased density is is out of context for the area I think the graphics that we've seen so far. So much rule that out this is exactly what it is developed with single family residential and predominantly small lot subdivisions. And then there's been there was some concern vote voiced by a couple people that about previous and existing uses. So the previous uses are not really relevant to this project that's something that that's just not relevant to this subdivision, the existing uses. I, again, I don't know that it's relevant to this project, but we can certainly talk about that. And so, for questions, this is my contact information I do answer my phone I think people can attest to that so if you call me. I would be happy to answer your questions and always follow up and writing I did this presentation because I know that there are neighbors here and so it's a little bit more than we usually see during subdivision committee. I hope I've addressed many of the questions so I'll just bring back to maybe the conceptual cycle actually I'm going to bring you back to the tentative map because that's what's before the committee. Thank you. Thank you, Ms. Murray and I really do appreciate your thoroughness in this presentation I think it really helps put things in contact. So thank you very much. We typically don't have a presentation by the applicant. And I don't have any questions of the applicant or staff. Like, you talked about public comments did we receive any recorded public comments. But like she let me go ahead and open the public hearing first. So if you have comments on this item. If you want to make comments, please choose the raised hand feature on zoom. Make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited, when you are invited to do so. If you are dialing in via telephone please dial star nine to raise your hand. Ms. Hopwood do we have any comments. And I have a I have a timer for three minutes. So we don't always use it we sometimes keep it rather informal but I can use the timer if the chair believes that might be appropriate. Yes, I think let's go ahead and be standard within all the other meetings within the city and use the three minute timer so Kimberly will you show that on the screen. Okay, let's get that tentative not down. Well, give me just a sec. All right. Share this. Sorry, long share. Okay. It's not working. It looked like it was working Kimberly. Did it. Hard for me to. Okay. Let me do this. Let me get our participants unmuted. Mr. Milman. Yes. Okay. Thank you to all of you out there being patient with us and this technology. Thank you. Yeah, using the timer is new to me. Okay, does that show up okay on screen. Okay, Mr. Milman. Can you see that? Yes, I can. Okay. Okay, Mr. Milman. I think you want to lead us. My name is Curtis Milman. I reside at 1692 random way. I've been a homeowner here for like 33 years. And I want to go on record that I am opposed to the project in its context. But I think that the building design as it's laid out right now, really is not a good fit for the existing homes here. And what I'm referring to is the way the houses are going to be situated. I'm going to be on the business end of a lot of cars that are going to be out of here. And what I mean by the business end is we pollution. The house is only 15 feet from the fence. And right now there's a car park there right now. And the guy was out there idling this morning. Okay. So my point is, is that if they turn these houses so they're pointed their business end is pointing at the existing home there. That would alleviate a lot and press. Decrease the density. I think that's just you theoretically you could have. And I would like to look at worst case scenario. There will be, in my estimation, there could be a dozen cars parked back there. So is this going to be a parking lot? Is it going to be a paved road back there, which will create additional heat. If I sit out in my back patio right here, I'm literally right on the fence line. So I'm going to be having automobiles and a road right there. So I guess the point I'm trying to make is the density. It's not a real good fit. That if they moved it over so that the houses were facing west. And they were on the business end that that existing houses on the business end of all that activity and automobiles and such. That would make a better fit. There's a lot of other things that that do come to mind also, you know, we talk about a housing crisis. Well, that may be so, but we're also in a water crisis. So I don't see how having hookups right now is going to be, it's going to be a good idea. That's probably the elephant room that needs to be addressed. But I think configuration is wrong. And what about, is there going to be a sound wall there to protect us from anybody? Like if they back their cars up, say somebody hits the gas instead of the break, they're going to come crashing through our fence here and they're going to get into, into my 15 feet of space before it hits the house and I could be, my family could be sitting back here. So I just think it's, it's too much density. It's configured wrong. Thank you, Mr. Millman. Thank you for listening. And I like to ask a question if I may. This was just dropped into our lab less than 10 days ago. And it's kind of feels like it's being rushed, but I don't know, I see this started back in 17, but we haven't heard anything up until about 10 days ago. And that, that a bit concerns me. I do have neighbors behind me and Michelle is out of town right now. I don't know if she's listening to us right now, but I spoke to her. And there's other people here like Rose Marie, two doors down. I don't think she does zoom certainly. And so I think we're at a bit of a disadvantage. I mean, I don't think we're going to have a public hearing where everybody could be involved. Would be more appropriate. Would be to have you folks come here and actually be on the lot. So you can see what's going on here instead of just looking at, looking at a piece of paper or map with it. So they're drawing on it. Does that make sense or not? Thank you, Mr. Millman. Ms. Hoplitt. Is there anybody else. With their hand raised on this item. Mr. Mr. Pardo, you should receive a prompt. Can you see the timer on the screen? I can. Can everyone hear me? Yes. Hi. Again, my name is Oscar Pardo. I, along with my wife, Sandra, we are the property owners of. Two zero four four shell born way, which is a property that is south of the. I have spoken to Mr. Millman. We've had discussions about, about this parcel. I, I too agree and echo and for the record, would like to state that the density level of the proposed parcel is, is a bit out of line in my view as to what the parcel can hold. Just perusing really quickly through the city center was a zoning code 20 dash 42.14 zero, which was previously referenced here. So, I'm going to go back to that. I'm going to go back to the setbacks that are, that are outlined in that zoning requirement, make it so that as Mr. Millman pointed out, it doesn't matter how these homes are situated. They're going to be sitting almost next to. All the adjoining properties. If it was in, if it was those setbacks were applicable to. The way the configuration is now into our property, I would literally have these houses, my end of the property, which I, if I'm going to do some very rough math and I'm looking at, and again, this is just rough math and not knowing exactly what type of housing is being put up. There is that a single story is, is a two story. It's hard to tell, but if I have. Two. Two of those homes at two stories each. 15 feet from, from my side, they're basically all facing all my, my bathrooms in my house. They're literally peering over into my side of the property. There's nothing right now in this present development that, that gives me any assurances that the setbacks are going to be followed, that the setbacks are not going to be encroaching over another properties. Mr. Millman has referenced just basic encroachment of the driving lane over onto his side of the parcel. I mean, these, these homes that are being proposed are not sitting on a regular street. These are, these are homes that are being shoehorned into a property. That if I look across the way to the, to the houses that are built on the north end of that property line, there's only two houses there. They're trying to fit three. And it's quite concerning that I understand that, that there's rules there that indicate that the development is appropriate. But as Mr. Millman had pointed out, if you stand on that property and you start looking around. And so how these properties are basically shoehorned into, into this parcel, they do have a strong impact on all the surrounding parcels. It's not as if they had their own street and, and their separation of backyards enough to allow some breathing space between the properties. The present proposal does not provide any of those. Separating elements that we typically see even in these smaller blocks. So that would be a good idea. I think that would be a good idea. I think that there would be a lot of developments here in, in coffee park. So with that, I would wish that, that. There would be subsequent meetings. To address not only the concern that Mr. Millman raised about several property owners not being present or able to access this information as we are. But to also have a better idea of what the property owners is actually intending to build. And to also have a better idea of what the property owners are doing. And to also have a better idea of what the property owners are doing themselves. So with that, I, I just, I'll put my time aside towards next. Thank you, Mr. Pardo. I do apologize. Miss weeks. I was checking something in the chat. I didn't realize that the clock had stopped. That's that's fine. Yeah. And we do have that chat. And it looks like a device name. So, oh, there, there it goes. So we have one more member of the public here. They can certainly choose to introduce themselves. Let me get this reset here. Yes. Hello. Yeah, we can. Oh, yes. Hi. Yeah. My name is David. You know, I'm the property owner of one, six, nine, six. And I'm the owner of the property. And I'm the owner of the property. And I'm the owner of the property. Next to Rosemary and Michelle. And the concern I have is that the proposed properties are too close to the back fence. I did put a new fence, six foot. And two feet of lattice. And my property will be basically getting all the traffic from. Like 16 home. And the three additional units. I don't know how to put it in the comment. They can just, you know, view my, my back, my backyard. And so, you know, I plan to put a jacuzzi eventually there. And I think the issues of privacy are a concern. And also the, all the noise. And, and so I just don't know how. Well, it's, it's going to be planned for, you know, the defense, if it's going to be reinforced for with concrete, or what, what, you know, what we're going to have that we will not have, you know, those kind of privacy issues and structural issues. That's it. Thank you. Thank you. Is there anyone else. I would like to speak on this item. Looks like we have Tim McWatt. Let's see. Wait. That hand go down. I saw a hand momentarily, but I don't see it anymore. Okay. Well, let's just wait a second and see if there's anybody else who raises their hand or. Okay. Okay. So I am going to close the public hearing. And bring it back to the staff. To ask some questions. So Ms. Murray. I have a couple of questions. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. I have a question. Committee. What's the noticing. Requirement. Or process to neighbors. Noticing. Noticing requirement. Well, for the public hearing. It is the 10 day noticing requirement. This is a really old file. And. Other notices. May or may not have been. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know what I did. We did do a neighborhood meeting. Which is required. And I don't have the dates available on that. But the, oh, you know what? It was back in the presentation. Hold on. Oh no, no, I'm sorry. I take that back. What I have in the presentation is about the. Meeting with staff. So I don't have the answer available on that right now, but I could probably if. If I can address the water questions, I can go back and do some, try to do some quick research. But I'll be away from the meeting from. That's okay. I just. There was a neighborhood meeting. I think is important. And the fact that the noticing requirements follow. The city standard noticing requirements is also important. I don't have the dates for either. Neighborhood meeting or. Or a notice. Thank you. And then before I go to Gabe, can you address the issue of the density again? Yeah. So the density. The density. The general plan land use designation allows a density of two to eight units per acre. They. For small lot subdivisions. Is how you get to that eight units per acre. And it allows the parcel sizes to be between. 2000 and 5,999 square feet. If we look around at the neighbors properties. To the north, one of the properties to the north is actually smaller. Than the proposed three. And they're all smaller than the, the proposed 9,000. The area, the density, I mean, the density, they, they're within the allowable density. And as I showed on, on one of the graphics, the neighborhood context. As far as the, I can see really it's, it's small, small lot residential and similar development. So. I think the bigger issue may be the. Not so much the density, but the layout. So. Thank you. Mr. Osborne, can you talk about. Water. Absolutely. That's an excellent question and actually an excellent concern. The city has secured the water rights for the full build out potential in the general plan within the city limits. And that's typically why we can allow development to move forward because those water rights do exist. In times of drought. What has a tendency to happen is we have to more closely monitor what the current. City policies are related to conservation and conservation can be a short-term approach to address something or it can be a long-term approach such as modifying requirements for landscaping, low flow water fixtures. So where we are now is we are in the stance of monitoring what the policies are either regionally or locally for water conservation and tracking that. And I think an important point with this action today, it really is a subdivision of land. It isn't building units that would result in water conservation that's the next step in the process and typically in situations where you have more severe strict restrictions, it starts getting into those application types. But it's a short-term issue typically is what we've seen more historically in the region, which means the conservation efforts are meant to address that more short-term situation. So important point, the water supply exists for these units because they are within the general plan densities. And we are monitoring those, conservation measures that will likely come down the road here in the future and to see how those will affect the more immediate development that happens with building permits. Thank you. And I thank you for reiterating that our role today is the subdivision of the land. That there will be other actions that will be taken around the building. Is that correct? That is correct. You know, typically building permits, which are ministerial actions and that's important for the public to understand as it gets to building permit. And Susie, are there any additional entitlements that would be associated with this or would it go straight to building permit? After this, it'll go straight to building permit. There was a conditional use permit, but that was approved last week. And that, that was, that should be because of the provisions that were in effect at the time this application was submitted. There was the review authority for a conditional use permit on properties within that resilient city combining district. We're allowed to be done at the director level. And needed to be approved prior to the, the tentative. Parcel map. The, in order to allow the, you know, the, the smaller lots. The, that, that provision has changed since that what has been removed. It was removed last October. However, because of the time, the date, the application was submitted. That, that those regulations were applicable. Thank you. I think. I mean, I don't have any other questions of, of staff on this. I think, you know, the fact that as we need to keep reminding ourselves what our purview is as a, as a subdivision committee, as that subdivision of the land. And it meets all the requirements and I can make all the findings. So we'll go ahead and. Call for a vote. Ms. Murray. Yes. Mr. Osborne. I. And I also vote I. So that concludes this item and thank you to the public for being here. I just wanted to just read out a couple of comments that appeared in our chat box. Okay. If that's okay. Sure. One of our attendees commented that the neighborhood meeting was on May 10, 2017. And. Another one of our attendees. Asked a question. And said, is there not an assumption? That if the lot is subdivided into three parcels that neighbors should expect three dwellings at minimum. Okay. Thank you. Okay. So we'll go ahead and move on to the next item. And I believe that's Mr. Ross. Is that correct? Yes. Chair weeks. One second here. I'll. Get it. Let me change my virtual background to something more appropriate. Okay. There we go. So I'm just going to open up the. Presentation. So this item is item 3.2. Public hearing. 1747 Linden lane and 1031 Carol lane. And Mr. Ross will be doing our presentation today. Okay. So. Okay. Great. Thank you. So thank you, chair weeks. And members of. Members of the community and attendance. My name is Adam. My name is Adam. My name is Adam Ross. Project planner for the waiver of parcel map. For the project before you. It is located at 1031 Carol lane. And 1721 Linden lane. So it's so a bit of the project. History and description here. This is part of the sandalwood subdivision. Which was approved in May. In May of 2006. The project at the time included a rezone. Conditional use permit for a small subdivision. And a mitigated negative declaration. In 2018. The developer. Recorded the final map. And then in. October 15th. Sorry. In October, 2020. A minor design was approved for this specific lot. Where it creates. A duplex. For the design of the duplex for this project. And since that time. For. Since that time, the project. Applicant. Became interested in creating. Do. Converting them to duets rather than duplexes. A duplex would be. Kind of like. It would be. Multi-family on. A single lot. So two units on one lot. And then the duet would be. Attached housing on individual lots. In a duplex type of. Form. So here's the project location. This is right now. This is the project location. This is the project location. And there's some construction going on showing. The. The subdivision being built. The general plan and zoning is low density residential. And our one six for single family residential. Again, there was a small subdivision approved with this project. That can 2006. That remains active. So long as the map remains active, which it has been. This entire time. And again, when it was recorded. It was. When it was recorded. It needs the density and zoning. District characteristics. So. This project. As you see here is the proposed lot line. So again, this is a waiver of parcel map that we're, that we would be acting on today to allow for the subsequent certificate of compliance. Which I think if you need clarification, maybe Gabe can, can specify that at a later time. These are the elevations. And so we're going to move this part of the. 2020. Minor design review application. Pretty straightforward. Nice looking. Duet units. Some of the required findings are. These are actually from the. Taken from the. Parcel map findings, subdivision findings. But in essence, it complies with all of those findings. As found in the staff report. And. They're the sequel. Is that the project. Received. An MND. City council adopted the MND. And the project hasn't changed outside of that scope. The. They've received all of their. All of their. Public improvements on the site. Which allows the approval of a parcel map waiver. And again, as far as sequel goes, the MND was adopted. And there are no. No new or additional. Bits of information that would require. Further analysis. As. As shown in sequel section. 15162. With that, we wrecked the planning economic development. For the development department recommends that the subdivision committee grant the requested waiver of parcel map to allow the subsequent certificate of compliance. For the construction of the sand pool with duet at 1031 Carol Lane in 1741, wind and lane. And I would just like to mention that an MND is a mitigated negative declaration for those. Who. Yes, I. I apologize. That's okay. I'll use. We all use shorthand. Thank you. Yes. A mitigated negative declaration. MND. Do you have any comments before we open up the public hearing? Just some minor ones. This proposal is, is very straightforward. We can make all the findings. It is actually part of an existing subdivision that has built all the associated improvements for the units. The units themselves aren't really visually changing because of what was it simply really a lot line to segment out that duplex. So from an engineering standpoint, there are no issues on this. And it really does fit the mold of what our waiver process is, is really defined to be. Thank you. So with that, I will go ahead and open the public hearing. If you wish to make a comment, please choose the raised hand feature on zoom. And if you can't find that, please put in chat that you can't find it. And Ms. Hopwood will help you. Make sure to unmute yourself when you're invited to do so. If you are dialing in via telephone, please dial star nine to raise your hand. And there will be a three minute timer on the screen at that point. So. Ms. Hopwood, do we have anybody? We do. Rick Rosenbaum. Okay. Kimberly, do you have the timer up? I can't see it, but. Can everybody see it? If I could clarify, Rick is the project applicant. Okay. Thank you. I apologize. That's okay. Okay. So go ahead, Mr. Rosenbaum. We have three minutes. If you have any comments you want to make on the project. Mr. Rosenbaum, you should have received a prompt and. You'll need to answer that prompt for us to be able to hear you. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. It looks like you're there. Go ahead and give it a try. Can you hear me now? Yes. Oh, okay. I saw the prompt. I just wanted to thank Adam and Gabe, the staff for the presentation. I don't have anything to add, except just wanted to. Also mentioned that the plans have been through the building department and have been redesigned for a. You know, a duet type of construction versus a duplex. So, I'm going to go ahead and give it a try. Okay. Thank you. Now, and it's our hope to sell them and deliver them to two home buyers, you know, sometime by the end of summer. So this is a real two new homes being added to your housing stock that are going to be sort of affordable by design based on their smaller square footage. And we're excited to kind of finish this. Administerial process and actually deliver. Two new homes to potential buyers. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Rosenbaum. Ms. Hopwood, do we have anybody else? That looks like the only hand that we had on that. Okay. So then. With that, I will go ahead and close the public comment period. And to see if we received any additional. Comments in chat or anything like that. Really. Okay. Thank you. So then we will. Close the public comment period. And bring it back to the committee. And it is as was stated before. I can make all the findings. It was very straightforward. Application of the waiver of the parcel map. So that will go ahead and take a vote. Mr. Ross. How do you vote? Hi. Osburn. Hi. Thank you. And I vote I also. So with that, we will go ahead and unless there's any other items, we'll go ahead and adjourn. The subdivision committee meeting. Of the 28th of April. That's it. Okay. Thank you, everybody. Thank you. Right. Anything else? Ms. Hopwood. No, that's good. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you, everybody. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Can I add one more comment? It might be a good thing to mention the appeal period at this time because this is an appeal of all. Oh, yes. Those appeal of all actions. I can. I'm not sure what the appeal period is. I'm sorry. Let me mention the. Okay. Thank you. Ten day appeal period. In which case you need to, you know, You know, You know, You know, You know, You know, You know, By submitting an appeal application, I believe both of these would be appealed to the planning commission. If the appeal falls on a Saturday or Sunday or a holiday, when we're closed, it would. The appeal. The appeal period would be extended to the following business day. So I don't have my calendar in front of me, but I can figure it out pretty quick. I believe that the appeal period would be. I don't have any applications available online. Thank you very much. Ms. Murray for pointing that out. I'll be sure that's added to the script chair weeks. Thank you. For you. All right. Thanks so much. So with that, we'll go ahead and.