 In certain circumstances, there comes a situation when a court has a right to access the records and they ask for it. Despite privilege and confidentiality policies, however, certainly some courts or the legitimate may still seek access to the privileged information as well as other confidential material because there are cases in which it is inevitable that the information is accessed. The mental health professionals must certainly respect the appropriate request which has been coming from the court so they cannot be ignored. Some practitioners assume that their working notes fall outside the realm of the material subject to disclose in the court. As I mentioned to you, psychotherapy has a medical record in which the symptoms, diagnosis and treatment are given but some have their personal notes. So usually psychotherapists assume that the personal notes cannot be requested by the court and they have no right to take them. They may feel stunned when a condition is demanding that they appear in a court and they have to bring with them any and all files, documents, reports, etc. that they are being asked that whatever you have written for that line, you have to produce everything. So in those situations, it becomes very difficult for them to provide their raw material notes but by the law they are minded to provide those notes as well. In such instances, understanding the difference between a saponia and a court order becomes critically important. The matters related to court may be of different natures but this is very important to understand that in which scenarios you have to provide each and everything which is being asked to you. A saponia simply compels a response. It usually requires you to appear to a certain place, certain date and a time to testify as a witness about a particular case. Now a court order would be different or a saponia would be a different situation but in this case, it has been issued to you that you have to present somewhere and you have to testify that this is being under your treatment. So this situation is different from the court order in which you are advised that you will provide your hurt details and your notes to the court. A court order on the other hand typically follows a hearing before a judge. Now it's a different situation. In this case, a judge has to be present and you are compelled to disclose until appeal for a highest court. So in this situation, proper supreme court, high court and all these things are involved and you have to provide what is properly asked to you. In the end, the court must decide what qualifies as protected or not. Now here the court's jurisdiction is that it says that which rule can be kept through your privacy by hiding what and what you cannot hide. While facing such type of situations, therapists must also reasonably safeguard the record of a client and material from inappropriate release. Even in those cases where the court is being involved and you have to share the notes and things with the court, it is very important to keep in mind that it is particularly useful for the judge and we don't officially release them as we see on social media these days that details are open and released. So the information of the client cannot be released. It is only used for the court's judgment. That would be an ethical point of view. But it's not open for everyone to get access to that information.