 The Principle C Integrity is the third and another important principle in ethical standards. This third principle summarizes what we are supposed not to do in our practice as a researcher as a psychologist. Acting with integrity includes being honest, being truthful, being accurate and consistent in one's action, words, decisions made, methods and outcomes. Integrity is something which we can explicitly see in the different domains of research. For instance, we have designed a project and we are assuming that there must be a positive relationship between these two variables. When analysis is done, the researcher gets to know that there is no correlation between these two variables. At times, the researcher gets very demoralized that I have been working on this specific project, I have seen different prior researches, in my custom, in my situation, in my society, these results are not positive. If we do not get a positive correlation between two things, it means that in that specific circumstances, this is also an addition to knowledge. This is also a finding itself. If you are aware that these two variables are not correlated, then it is not that this research was not successful, but at times, some unexperienced researchers do that, that they fabricate the research, manipulate the data of the research, make false entries in it, or they don't justify the results in any way. Then here comes the issue of integrity came, because when the three specific research become the part of the knowledge gap, and we will say that prior researches did these researches, what if those researches are not being done on a merit of integrity? Then, to quote those researches and to relate future researches to them will be a very big ethical dilemma. So we need to report very accurate results. It requires self-interest to one side and being objective and open to challenge in one's behavior in professional context. What if you are getting results which are not according to your own choice, which are not getting to be appropriate to your professional growth, it does not matter. What matter is being integrity and what matter is being honest, being truthful and those results should be reported for the sake of our society, for our future scientists, to produce a good ethical standard and further research work can be done on those researches. The principle suggests that psychologists should promote accuracy or honesty and do not steal, cheat or engage in fraud, sub-fraud and international misinterpretation of fact. For instance, let's say if a researcher who is working in an area of zoology, which comes into life on land, and we have an SDG who has research to support it, we see that it is such an important research and he is doing a research on the fisheries. And he is not following the integrity principle and he says that we have put so many feet into it, it is such a production rate and in so much time duration, we get results from its feed. He has not been doing that actually, maybe he is just visiting some time on some fish pond and he is observing some very light things with it and while passing his time, he has made a research report and he produces it. So what will happen in his results, the researchers who will come in the future, will be misinterpreted research report light, that is going to flop the whole research because it will not be authentic, it will be flawless, it will not be flawless, there will be a lot of issues, you know one single thing is going to disturb the chain of other researches which will have to be conducted. So integrity is very, very important in reporting the research and another example, a somewhat recent widely publicized case of lack of integrity in the research of that Mr. Dietrich Staple, he was a Dutch social scientist who fixed the result in over 30 of his papers, some of them were published in very prestigious and esteemed journals. Now he had a lot of students in his lab, he was a very senior researcher but he never involved anyone in a data collection and when repeatedly some of his 30 papers were published on similar topics in different research journals, in fact more than 50 of which there were no very esteemed journals, so then some of the researchers identified that his data, the process of data collection is always a very senior researcher alone, how is he doing it? Then they investigated that and they get to know that there was no data collection, there was just one data sheet which was being published by the research and multiple researches. So these days the journal asked for the data sheet and they said that you send your complete record to us, so all of this is because in such stages the publication could be involved. Now a statement of value for this very important principle integrity says psychologist value are nesty, probity, accuracy, clarity and fairness in their interaction with all persons and people. In order to do so they should avoid exploitation and conflict of interest and maintain the personal and professional boundaries and address the misconduct, so if we get to see that somewhere some such researches are fabricating, falsifying results or some such malpractice is happening, this is very important to report that, reporting of such journals, reporting of such researchers, identifying the malpractice of such psychologists, this all comes under the category of integrity for not only researchers but all other people who are involved in this very professional psychology.