 undemocratic politics in the 21st century. In this session, we are going to discuss this topic that what type of undemocratic politics in the 21st century is going on and what type of implications these trends will have on the future politics. Because after the fall of Berlin Wall and the democratization and the modernization in Central Europe, the study of undemocratic regime is just like reviving the old study again. Today, if we talk about the Berlin Wall before or in the modern process of democratization that took place in Europe and in those parts of Europe, the countries of Central Europe, so it doesn't seem like we are talking about the old times again. But we all know that the debate regarding the practicing of more democratized political culture, it is much related and relevant even in the 21st century. Because what are the undemocratic policies and practices by the state? Traditionally, they were divided as the totalitarian and authoritarian style of governance. But nowadays, there are basically three types of classification like number one, the authoritarian, fascist debates. When the state exerts its monopoly over power and imposes exclusively one ideology on the basis of which it attempts to total mobilization of the population through a single party and various organizations controlled by the same. Then if the ideology that is remained the same, but on the basis of that ideology there are the process of radical transformation of society and then definitely the calling for the extermination of all people. If that ideology is not being followed, then people there will not have the basic scope and the central controlled state bureaucracy will actually do policy making and policy implementation as well. There are many problems in this system. But if the party is mainly controlled by the state and then there is the force participation, people have to link themselves with the same party. So obviously, within such a society, within such a system, that system is very far from democracy. But still, we can see such examples. Then the authoritarian style of government, where the political systems with limited, not responsible political pluralism without elaborate and guiding ideology. Authoritarian regimes will not have ideology, but with distinctive mentalities and without extensive, not intensive political mobilization. Political mobilization will also not be there. That is, participation of people will not be bothered. Rather, the system itself will impose various policies. Then there is another system about that category of undemocratic regimes that fits neither the totalitarian nor the authoritarian modus. That is normally many political sociologists. They divide this kind of system that the extreme form of party monilism in which autocracy is solely based on personal rulership exercised without restraints. In this, the ruler has his own will. How does he want to run the system? What are its priorities? But in the system, there is no voice for people. So today's modern world, in the 21st century, what is happening? There are different models in the world, where the system is either in the hands of a party or a person or in the hands of a certain group in which the voice of people is not a representation of people. And usually in such regimes, their practices are not democratic practices. So, even in the 21st century, such problems are being seen in the world.