 I welcome members to the 19th meeting in 2014 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, and as always, I ask members to turn off their mobile phones. Apologies have been received from Stuart McMillan, in his place I welcome Bruce Grofford, and from Margaret McCulloch, in his place I welcome Mary Fee. For general item one, instrument subject to affirmative procedure, no points have been raised by our legal advisers on the Registers of Scotland Fees Order 2014 draft, nor on the land registration etc., Scotland Act 2012, incidental consequential and transitional order 2014 draft, nor on the public appointments and public bodies etc., Scotland Act 2003, treatment of revenue Scotland, a specified authority, order 2014 draft. With regard to the Registers of Scotland Fees Order 2014, the committee may wish to note that this instrument was withdrawn and subsequently relayed by the Scottish Government in order to correct several drafting errors and minor points that were identified by our legal advisers on behalf of the committee. I just note in relation to the policy note, and I'm not addressing policy issues in raising this point, that the financial effects, the statement is made, the instrument is no financial effects. Now, while a very brief look at the policy would confirm that it has likely very minimal, I feel uncomfortable about the use of the word no. I can identify that, for example, given you've added a body that might be travel costs to go and meet candidates, there's unlikely to be any salary implications, and I think a better phrasing would be it has minimal financial effects or the new responsibilities can be addressed within existing resources. I just think it's overregging the pudding to say no financial effects. In this case, it will be likely the policy committee will look at it to be very, very small indeed, but I prefer to see a more focused wording. Thank you for those comments. Can I just for the record register that that is the Registers of Scotland's Fees Order? It isn't. It is the public appointments. Thank you very much. That's absolutely fine. Thank you. Is the committee otherwise content with these instruments, please? Thank you. Agender item two is instrument subjects and negative procedure. No points have been raised by our legal advisers on the Children's Hearing Scotland Act 2011 supplementary provision order 2014, SSI 2014, 137. Is the committee content with that instrument, please? Agender item three, instruments not subject to any parliamentary procedure. The Children and Young People Scotland Act 2014 commencement number one and transitory provisions order 2014, SSI 2014, 131. Article 21 of the order commences section 98 for the purposes of commencing paragraph 21 of schedule five to the Children and Young People Scotland Act 2014 on the 28th of June 2014. The reference to paragraph 21 of schedule five should not have been including column three of the table in the schedule to the order. This is a superfluous provision which purports to commence section 98 again for the same purpose with effect from the 1st of August 2014. Does the committee therefore agree to draw the orders to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground as it contains a minor drafting error? We do. Thank you very much indeed. That, I think, completes the agenda. If there's nothing else to say, I close this meeting and we'll welcome you back next week.