 So the question now I have is that when these are the advantages and we saw that multiple people had multiple point of views before joining the course and there are very positive reasons why we should join. So if that is the motivation of people joining, then why the completion is not so high? I think completion has a lot of dependency. The completion rates as they call it has a lot of dependency on the number of entry points. Now when a resource is available so open, it is natural that most people will try to have a look at it and they will come in. No, but even if you think about the moves that you yourself have enrolled for and you have completed. I have enrolled for more moves than I have completed myself. And one reason for that is that you are ambitious at the time of enrollment. That you are attracted, you feel you want to learn that and so you say I'll enroll and later on priorities change and you say that okay look or you get a little bit out of it and you are willing to run with it. So that has been the issue for me. How many will agree with this point that when we look at a book title or even abstract, we expect some range and we already know that because it is open and flexible, we have a chance of skipping something. Now when the actual move starts, we decide the other way. We actually skip a lot and only keep a fraction of it like what we wanted to do. Maybe probably people have a look at only, so I have an analogy here. So to me, looking at a series of courses available in a book or a bunch of book platforms is like browsing a book shop. So I'm browsing a book shop and I buy a bunch of books. I read a little bit out of many of them. So I buy books but it takes me a lot of time to complete that. But do you read every book, every word? So the analogy to me works that you are interested in the topic. You want to kind of browse through it, get a feel for it and then keep it back if you don't like it. So going by the same analogy, now if the bookstore guy says that books are for free, just take whatever you want and you can also browse. So the bookstore will appear in your house? No sir, we want to put in my house and start getting cluttered. But still, I will carefully choose the books. For me, if there is a genre, let's say it's fiction or let's say it's biographies. My house is my bookstore. Yes, it works in a way that people will still take but not read is exactly what I want. So I won't take books that I know for sure that I won't read. You are one of the samples. Correct, correct. Who will be choosy while taking and we won't be writing. But if you think there is a chance I might read it, you might pick it up. Yes. There's a higher likelihood you might pick it up if it's free. Yeah, there is a higher likelihood. If you're not going to read it, there's no way because it will be junk. That's a bigger problem. Correct, correct. So I think the owner allows you to just tear out a chapter and go home. I know this for books. No, that's not right. Honestly, he allows you to do Xerox one chapter of your choice. I'm saying it's very knowledge taking, it's more modular in nature and you would love to. Actually, you know what I would like. If I knew that the bookstore was close to my house and I could go whenever. Just go there and read. I would just go there, read when I wanted to have the coffee they serve and come back. Because the atmosphere is also pleasant. It's not the book as much as the whole experience and access. So I think the book analogy we can move. But I think they're done with that analogy. Yeah, yeah. And this is, the MOOC is a bookstore. It's that analogy. Now the other thing, the MOOC is a class. It's the other analogy. Yeah, but the connect is the important thing. I have a different reason. I mean, I agree with this reason also. But my reason comes now from the interaction and human perspective. So I'm not making an analogy with the bookstore because to me MOOC is not, I mean, it's more of a living thing. It's more like my fitness classes. Why? So I go for multiple fitness classes. The ones where there are fewer people. I know the teacher and I know the fellow participants. There is a little bit of a responsibility towards them. It's like, I know they're expecting me to come. Nobody will yell at me. But if nobody shows up, the teacher is alone and I feel bad. And if all of us go, the class is a wonderful class. Because it's not just one on one. On the other hand, I recently just dropped out of a class which was happening in IIT. There were 70 people. And I didn't know the teacher. I didn't like the teacher. That was a separate thing. And it was so impersonal and she was just doing her own thing. There are some students who are great and I was just trying to emulate them. But it was no connect to me at all. So I don't know if that's just the massiveness or the lack of connect. I think connect. Connect is the point, I think. The connect is the important thing. I mean, you have to either connect to the instructor or to other people in the class. I mean, there has to be that feeling of togetherness. Yeah, and the feeling that I matter. I matter in some way. That somebody cares about my learning or my presence or... I mean, that's what happens to the... I mean, even in college, when the attendance became non-mandatory. Either it was that, okay, if I don't go to class, I can't pass the exam. That was one motivation. I can't pass the exam or I really want to learn this something. But there was also this thing that, look, if I show up there, there's somebody who's noticing it. And that was both a nice thing as well as responsibility.