 Russia captures U.S. Bradley IFV in Ukraine and analyses its combat capabilities. In February 2024, images of a captured, intact U.S. Bradley M2A2 infantry fighting vehicle with its vital equipment removed circulated on Russian social networks. This reflects the Russian authorities' intention to study technologies developed by NATO militaries. This was not the first time, as in July 2023, photos of a captured Swedish CV9040 IFV whose equipment had also been analysed surfaced. Army recognition media outlet reported this. The capture of the U.S. Bradley M2A2 by the Russian Army could have several implications and uses. Firstly, studying a vehicle designed for NATO troops like the Bradley M2A2 and the Swedish CV9040 could provide the Russian military with valuable intelligence on Western military's latest technologies, engineering and design principles. This information could be used to identify strengths and weaknesses in the vehicle's design, tactics and operational capabilities. Analyzing these captured vehicles could help Russian engineers identify vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the vehicle's armor, sensors and electronic systems. This knowledge would allow them to develop effective countermeasures to improve the survival of their armored vehicles and strengthen their defense against similar platforms used by potential adversaries. It is also very likely that the Russians will develop new weapons capable of destroying Western vehicles. Furthermore, the Russian military might be interested in integrating some of the advanced features or design concepts found in the Bradley M2A2, IFV and CV9040 IFV into their armored vehicle programs. By capturing and examining the vehicle, they could learn about innovations in areas such as crew protection, mobility, firepower and situational awareness, potentially influencing the development of their future armored vehicles. US warns Russia against nuclear-capable anti-satellite weapons. The Biden administration recently issued direct warnings to the Russian government against deploying a nuclear-capable anti-satellite weapon US officials confirmed to CBS News. The warning was part of a broader diplomatic push that has also involved urging the Indian and Chinese governments, among others, to weigh in directly with Moscow. The talks come after a warning from House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner, Republican of Ohio, who issued a cryptic statement last week regarding a serious national security threat propelled the matter to public prominence. White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby later said Turner's concern was related to a space-based anti-satellite capability being developed by Russia but added the capability had not yet been deployed and did not pose any immediate threat to American citizens. We are not talking about a weapon that can be used to attack human beings or cause physical destruction here on Earth, Kirby said. That said, we've been closely monitoring this Russian activity and we will continue to take it very seriously. CIA Director William Burns recently engaged with Russian spy chief Sergei Naryshkin about the matter according to a US official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks. Canada is ready to send troops to Ukraine on one condition. Canada is open to sending a limited number of troops to Ukraine. Canadian troops will not take part in combat operations but they are ready to train Ukrainian soldiers according to Canadian Defence Minister Bill Blair. Blair said that the idea of sending military personnel was discussed earlier this week in Paris where he was present while Canada, like many other NATO countries, opposed the idea proposed by French President Emmanuel Macron. Blair announced a potential non-combat mission for Canadian troops. This involves sending a limited number of military personnel to train Ukrainian defenders within Ukraine's territory provided that such an operation is conducted far from the front lines. According to reports, the security agreement between Canada and Ukraine signed last week allows Canada to conduct training activities in Ukraine when conditions permit. For the first time in the West, the idea of sending troops to Ukraine was raised at the highest level. French President Emmanuel Macron voiced it at an informal summit in Paris stating that nothing can be ruled out. Military and political observer of the Information Resistance Group, Olexander Kovalenko, notes that Macron is addressing various geopolitical issues expanding influence in Armenia and heading a coalition of long-range weapons supplies to Ukraine. Maybe he feels like Napoleon on a horse, but his statement really raises many questions. What troops will be in Ukraine? For what purpose? Why? With what functionality? Will they act as peacekeepers? Then what will they do? Stand along the line of contact and monitor the ceasefire? But why stop the fire if Ukraine has repeatedly stated that we will not stop until we win or as full-fledged allies, like during World War II, who will liberate Ukrainian territory? I have big doubts about this. It won't happen. We don't live in the times of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. And in general, we are surrounded by quite weak politicians who will not make such tough decisions. He notes.