 So what are the pain points or the negatives you see when you use iExplorer? Like the challenges you face while using the explorer. And Deepika, maybe you can give some examples of kind of feedback that you have received from others that people can start commenting. So we got some responses through the survey we shared on LinkedIn. So some of the responses for this question was user management to integrate our training network, setting the explorer and the responsiveness of our UI. So these were some of the responses we got. So is there anything else you guys face during using the explorer? Maybe I can start. So Deepika, I think I told you a few things, right? Currently the user management aspect is difficult with explorer. Right? Anytime we need to do, let's say, reconfigure a new fabric instance, then I will have to restart the explorer. And ideally the way I would like to have explorer is I will host explorer somewhere in my environment, let's say in my enterprise setup. And I should be able to point my explorer at runtime by supplying the connection profile information or the connection. Yeah, that's the way fabric operates. I should be able to supply connection profile information. Dynamically, and I should be able to manage which network I want to see details about. If you see Grafana, right? In Grafana there is an option to see different dashboards and somebody can create a new dashboard at runtime. It allows us to dynamically create new graphs and create a dashboard out of that set of graphs in one page. And then I can keep browsing across those dashboards. Depending on what the need is, I can switch between them. But explorers, even though the idea and the design, initial design was like that, but right now it is all statically and manually configured. There is no such option where we can go and say, here is a new connection profile for the new network. I want to connect to that network as well from the current running instance of explorer. I think this goes into that multi-tenancy aspect of explorer. Anyone else? Maybe CPU related something that activity set that comes that is also better for people to monitor. From my side, Deepika, I feel like, you know, as we have not like tested the performance rigorously. I'm wondering if there is like, with larger data sets, how would our explorer application will work? I didn't get that. So it is basically more technical. Like we have huge data, right? So how would our explorer application fetch the data in public to the UI? That means we need to test. Basically the responsiveness of the application, that's what she's expecting. Okay. And I would like to actually have a visual representation of my network setup, right? Like a graph or not a graph, like a picture which shows here are the nodes and these are the nodes which are connecting to each other through this channel. And here is another channel that exists in the network. And these are the nodes which are online or offline. And this is the minimum information about each node, which captures at least the endpoint, the MSP ID, such information, a visual representation of how the network layout is structured. And maybe optionally show which smart contracts exist on those peers. And maybe like those smart contracts are tied to a specific channel. And maybe like an audit log of what's happening across my network. This could be information such as a new channel was created, or maybe a new chain code was deployed on this node, or it could be a new version is available. Such information about what's happening in the network, like latest happenings in a network. Okay. And having said that latest happenings, I feel like one more information that currently does not exist anywhere is, I feel like Explorer is the right place to do that. I don't know if there is place where we fetch current policies and display those policies to user. I know there are like CLI option, command line options, but there is no central place where we can download the configuration, current configuration. I feel in the channel section of Explorer, where we can instead of allowing us showing the channels, we could also let users view the current policies that is configured on the channel. Similarly, on the chain code or the smart contracts, we can let them view information of what's the latest sequence that was committed. And maybe the package ID that it corresponds to Explorer should give like state information of what's there on the blockchain without having to run any commands. So this kind of information will help. Okay. So in the survey form we got some like we asked the question like what are the features you would like to add and we got like features like column filtering and the visualization of data provenance, etc. So is there anything else you guys wish to add? Can you come again? So we had another question like are there any features they would like to add? So we got like column filtering and the visualization of data provenance, etc. So is there anything something similar to that you guys wish to have in Explorer? Maybe additional metrics, one thing we can add. How about support for different database apart from Postgres? Or maybe like create an interface and let people write their own database integration layer if they have their own choice of database. Then decouple any dependency in the code, any hard coding in the code with interfaces so that people can bring in their own database. So is there a way we get like warnings from a deployed blockchain networks? And when I say warnings, these warnings would tell us that something is going wrong in the network or some action is pending on somebody which they have not taken for a long time. I'm trying to think of an example. Okay, one example from a fabric standpoint could be some organization initiated a new sequence for the same code. They expect everyone else to take an action. Now there is no standard way of telling this right fabric tells us that we do this out of the bag. We go to them, we tell them they need to upgrade. I don't know if Explorer can help in those cases by notifying saying that here is an alert or a warning. That's because somebody has done some action at the network level because Explorer gets visibility at the network level. I don't know if such things matter to us. Maybe that's a beneficial feature. Yeah, in addition to that, I want more like the certificates also, right? By default, some one-year validity is something like validity when it's going to expire, right? Even those things also if something we can alert that is also one feature we can add. Because as of now in the fabric, unless it is going to expire, it will not have any alert, I think that's all. Only after expiring only we are not able to connect to network and we're getting issues. Right. So Deepika, I think that means we need to have an alerting mechanism in Explorer and a way to use that alerting mechanism from multiple means. Those alerts could be from different places. We need a way to tie those back to those specific sections. Okay. Any other questions, Deepika? So I was thinking to ask them about the response we got regarding the UI, which can be like the Firefly UI. So, Eswama, you can. Yes. Actually, I was the one that added that Firefly. I noticed the blockchain and it was looking very good. And I think there are also the nodes that Arun or Arjun, they said like the nodes display or something. They actually have picks in the Firefly like GitHub. So I was thinking something like the dark mode and everything looks better. So I was just trying to give an idea that it would look better if we have something like that only for the visuals. Okay, Mama, we will be having like, I will be having a meet with Firefly UI design team and we will look into that. Arun, that's it. I have gotten covered the questions. Thanks, Deepika. These feedback will help you in your discovery and looking forward to have a new user experience designed for the Explorer too. And as I said, like the design that you do will impact the entire world and people are looking forward to use Explorer. So the way people see Explorer is through your lens. So the way you design impacts in a big way. So looking forward to anything else from anybody else that we will have to discuss. I will recap the action items that have been done so far, at least on my part. One is to test the pending RHSPR and for the Helm chart, Arjun, you said you will fall off and then our goal is to merge it with comments saying that it is not production ready, at least on the Helm chart. So will we continue improving the Helm chart production ready Helm chart? We will for now release whatever we have. And the second thing is about the copyright. We'll have to check with the foundation if we can add any copyright statements at the bottom. And the third question is about that I'll follow up with Manoj and Verma to debug the release script issue that Verma spoke about. The next one is action items like Manoj will take up to do a solar cube fix so that we don't do a solar cube scan for every PR, but we rather do it after the merge. Manoj will prioritize this before the release. If there are any questions, he will reach out to the team. And the next action item is to start using container registry. And this goes back to the first point that we had, it was to check, make sure that the PR that Aditya has raised works for me. Anything else that I missed? I know there was one more action item on me that is still long. This was related to the user access and the IEM integration. And I think in time so far, we'll keep that open. Yeah, sure. The other one on the IEPLGEL form submission that we'll do tomorrow. Perfect. And the release activities. I think for release, we took down four step process, starting with the labs proposal that you just mentioned. And then we do a release and then we do a presentation to the TUC. Then we request them to make it a popular project. Anything else from anybody else? Sorry, I need to just cross it. Arun, this is one of the things. So is this same as issue 426? Sorry, which issue? 426. You're asking about data issue 426. Yeah, I think that's the same issue. Yeah, Manoj. Current issue, anything you're stuck or you're able to proceed? Manoj, what is this? So last week I had a call with Archana and Ramu. So they gave me a good idea about these testing services and database services. And I was looking into the issue numbers of 3932 and the boot time loading. So currently I was just understanding how the series is happening testing service. And I was about to start implementing the approach in order to rectify that. And yeah, that's it. Do you need any inputs or you'll be able to proceed Manoj? As of now I'm going to say that all the things were explained by Archana and Ramu. Okay, thanks Manoj. Please, let us know if you need any information. Otherwise you can proceed with the fixing those changes. Yeah, as Arun mentioned, I'll just prioritize this. I think one thing that I forgot to mention in the summary is about the maintainers.mb file that we called out. Apart from the release related PR that Varma was working on. I believe Varma will take care of that. Whom should I add in the maintenance? Archana, do you have a list from Infosys team? Names to be added there. Yeah, I will give it to Arun. That you have added mine. I think I can also add right now. Yeah, so I added Archana as administrator to the project. So she has more access than the maintenance right now. So I think only Archana and I have that admin access as of now. And if needed, feel free to let us know we can add more members as needed. Okay, yeah, sure. And Arun, for that issue, first I'll check the why it is causing the issue. But we'll connect tomorrow sometime. Yes, we can coordinate on the Discord. I think I have your Discord ID. Archana, share that with me sometime. I'll also bring you there. But first I want to check it myself. So if I can find it, then it's good. Okay, sounds good to me. Anything else? No, Arun, that's all right. Thanks, Arun. Thank you. Thank you.