 Last night, for the very first time, certainly not the last time though, me and my wife and Carter, we ended up going to Lamar Jackson's new restaurant that he got, play action, soul food, and more. If y'all ever down in South Florida, you have to, you gotta go there. Trust me, you gotta go there. Like this belly is not here for no reason. I got plenty of experience with food. But anyway, while we were there, I got the sweet and tangy wings with fries, was fire, Carter got his chicken tenders with fries. He loved it. My wife got smothered turkey wings with rice, with mac and cheese, with collard greens, and with cornbread. Hers was excellent as well. We also got a strawberry cake and banana pudding. So y'all make sure you go there and check it out. Usually when I go to a new restaurant that I've never been to before, I usually try to consume like two or three meals. And I'm pretty successful at doing it. Again, I'm sure this belly got plenty of experience. And the reason I do that is because I just don't know when the next time I'm going to be back. But last night, I only got one meal. And I did consume it and it was great. But then as you know, what we all do, we go on Instagram, we post the food that we ate, especially if it was good, especially if it's from a new place. We posted on our stories and whatnot. And I did that last night and shout out to Lamar Jackson for the repost. But I was scrolling on Instagram this morning and I saw something that I just couldn't digest. And it was a report, not even a report, just a sort of suggestion from an article from Bleacher Report Gridiron. And I was just like, nah, I cannot consume that at all. Because now it is the time of year where they start to throw out a lot of different trade scenarios. And one of the headlines was Saquon Barkley to the Chiefs. And I'm like, man, it seems like Bleacher Report in a lot of these places, they try to trade Saquon Barkley like every year. Remember last year, or was it this year when they were suggesting that Ravens should trade for Saquon Barkley? But anyway, so I was scrolling through a couple of the different players that they were suggesting that teams should trade for. And then I stumbled upon one and I was like, oh, I almost threw up, almost did. Because it said the Colts should trade for Marcus Peters. And I was like, yuck, it would be excellent for the Colts. It would be phenomenal for the Colts. But for the Ravens, I'm not even going to allow Ravens to think of this. If the thought even crossed their minds, I will be up there quick, fast and in a hurry to just shut it all down. But anyway, let's look and see the why because we got a couple of different trade scenarios that they suggested that involved the Ravens, four of them as a matter of fact. And we're gonna go through each of the four. Now the first one that we just talked about, the Colts will be getting Marcus Peters. And guess what they will give up? Guess what they will give up for Marcus Peters? A third round pick, a 2023 third round pick. What, for Marcus, yeah, you silly for that. But anyway, let's read the why. It's unlikely we see two AFC playoff contenders make a swap involving an impact starter, but the Colts should try regardless. Ravens star quarterback Marcus Peters is coming off a torn ACL and it's in the final year of his contract. Baltimore, which only has six million cap space could open 10 mil to roll over to 2023, if it dealt Marcus Peters. The 29 year old Peters was one of the most dangerous turnover threats in the NFL until his injury. He has 31 interceptions and 86 pass breakups in seven seasons and has become a much more trustworthy option in coverage compared to his first two years in the league. Baltimore recently signed veteran Kyle Fuller as depth to go with 2022 fourth round pick, Jaylen and Moore Davis and Eamon Marshall. Don't forget about Pepe now. Like, come on and really y'all, like it's no offense to him. It's no offense to him, but they really included Eamon Marshall in this article and he has barely even seen the fit. Like, come on. They're like, that's how I know like, and it's no, I understand. You cover all 32 NFL teams, so you can't deep dive into every single NFL team. I get that, but maybe, and I know BR, Gridiron, Bleacher Report. I know they got the personnel to do it. Maybe they should allocate somebody to like each division who could take a deep dive into the four teams, or they just take 32 people and have them each dedicated to a team to really deep dive into the, but anyway. Anyway, it wouldn't be shocking if Peters was made available. So this is what they said. Based off of this, Baltimore recently signed veteran quarterback Kyle Fuller as depth to go with 2022 fourth round pick, Jaylen and Moore Davis and Eamon Marshall. It wouldn't be shocking if Peters was made available. Oh yes, it certainly would. It certainly would. Now Kyle Fuller, we know that that's a nice depth piece for the Ravens. That is not the Raven starter. He's not the starter, he could start, but no, don't try to mess with our cornerbacks. Anyway, he said Indianapolis would be a natural landing spot as it goes all in around Matt Ryan. The current array of options across from Stefan Gilmore is a gamble, as Brandon Fakeson hasn't even put together for a season of consistent play yet. Peters would raise the ceiling of that unit considerably in 2022. He would, he certainly would. Oh, he would make them that much better like that. Instantly, immediately, right away, right away. No doubt in anybody's mind, but it's a no. No, no, I'm not letting it happen, not Marcus Peters. No, I can't let that one slide. But anyway, I was going up and down the article and stuff and I was like, oh, they suggested, they went through all 32 teams. So I was like, okay, that's what they suggested for the Indianapolis Colts as a trade option, but what do they suggest for the Baltimore Ravens to do? Somebody for them to acquire. Scotty Miller from the Bucks. Wide receiver Scotty Miller. And in that trade, let's just read the actual trade. Tampa Bay Buccaneers, they were seemingly equipped to handle losing two star receivers in 2021 and still push for a Super Bowl run. On top of Chris Gotwin's torn ACL in week 15, the Bucks also watch Antonio Brown walk off the field mid game in week 17. And yeah, we all remember that. The Bucks plugged in the combination of Tyler Johnson, Cyril Grayson and Brashad Peridman. Yup. And almost got past the eventual Super Bowl champion, Los Angeles Rams. Gotwin is back but still recovering from his injury. So the Bucks wisely added Russell Gage from Atlanta. The Forgotten Man amongst the group is fourth year receiver Scotty Miller. Miller spent seven weeks on injury reserve due to a turf toe injury, but only played sparingly in nine games and was a healthy scratch in week 14. Miller's lack of impact was shocking considering the success he found with Tom Brady in their first year together. The speedy five, nine, 174 pounder. Average 15.2 yards per catch and total 501 yards and three scores in 2020. He's stuck behind the deepest receiving corps in the league that the Bucks will catch on in Baltimore with his agility. I mean, his ability to get open quickly. Baltimore opted against adding another quality receiver despite moving Marquise Brown during the NFL draft, creating a massive hole that Miller could feel for a much cheaper price. Scotty Miller's cool. I don't think Scotty Miller could do some things with the Ravens, but I just don't feel like he would move the needle. If they got him, okay, cool. But I just don't feel like he would really push them over the top like that. And he would be another smaller frame receipt. We got enough of those in my opinion. In my opinion, we got enough smaller receivers. And the Ravens from all the underactive free agents that they signed, it seems like they trying to go in a different direction when it comes to wider receivers. So with that trade, it'd be like, I'm leaning more towards no, I wouldn't be mad if they did it, but I wouldn't feel like it would push them over the top. The receiver I'm looking for, I want somebody to push them over the top. But anyway, we could talk about that later. Next trade scenario, Dallas Cowboys. And who would they receive from the Baltimore Ravens? Good old Chuck Clark. The Cowboys will get Chuck Clark. The Ravens will get a 2023 fourth round pick. Now that would actually be pretty good for Chuck Clark for the Ravens to actually receive a fourth round pick. Now me, I would prefer that Chuck Clark stayed because the more the merrier. And again, quality depth, quality depth, man. You don't, again, if you learned anything from last year, you can never have enough quality depth. And to have a starting Chuck Clark, a starting Marcus Williams, and then a potential starter with Kyle Hamilton, it just, yeah, I would have rather them keep Chuck Clark. But anyway, one of the cleanest potential trades exist between two conference contenders. The Baltimore Ravens invested heavily into the safety position this off season, signing free agent Marcus Williams to a $70 million deal and drafting Kyle Hamilton in the first round. Ravens defensive coordinator Mike McDonald even acknowledged there's not a clear role for Chuck Clark after those moves. Clark is set to receive a new contract after this season and would surely rather be in a situation where he can build value and cash in. Dallas has the perfect openings next to free safety Malik Hooker and versatile defender Jaron Curse. He actually used to play for the Ravens for that a little bit. It was real quick. He said the Cowboys saw both Keanu Neal and Demonte Kazee depart and free agency and Clarkwood could help fill the box safety role. They split in 2021. So, so far, so good. I appreciate how they broke this down. They must be Cowboys fans, the person who wrote this part of the article because he was very detailed with it. And he even mentioned Chuck Clark being one of those, the safeties that works in the box. I appreciated that because he could have went out and been like, oh yeah, Chuck Clark, he'd be rolling in the field and I would have been like, hold up now. Do you know Chuck Clark? But I, so I appreciated that. Anyway, he said Clark and Curse offer well-rounded skill sets that give defensive coordinator Dan Quinn more flexibility when moving each around. Both can cover tight ends in the slot, attack the line of scrimmage and functionally play two high shales. Hooker would be relied upon more to play the ball and produce turnovers. See, I appreciate that because Chuck Clark is not a turnover machine, anything like that. But he's a solid guy that, yeah, they will play a lot in the box. So I appreciated that. So this would be a scenario where I think it would actually be a good scenario, more so for the Dallas Cowboys than the Ravens. Because like I said, I would rather, much rather than keep Chuck Clark just for quality depth than to trade him away. And then like, cause I know they still got Gino Stone, you got Tony Jefferson, you got, who else? You got Ardarius Washington, you got Brandon Stevens. So you do got a lot of other options. So it wouldn't be the end all be, if they traded Chuck Clark, it wouldn't be like, oh man, yeah, we're done. But to have all of that and still have Chuck Clark and still have all of that too, it would make me that much more comfortable as the season went on. So, but this trade scenario, that one wasn't so bad. Now, here goes another one. Now, this one would be like, oh, that is my reaction to this one. So New York Giants, they would receive Nick Boyle and a 2023 six round pick. So they would get two things, but hold up, what would the Ravens receive? Wide receiver, Kenny Gallade. And that is such a tricky one. We know with the Giants, it was a big yikes last year, didn't score a touchdown and he was hurt a lot too. That price tag is through the roof. So, and I know Ravens, they looked at him last year, they didn't make an off anything like that, but they just checked in. And I remember with the Lions, the issue wasn't his play. The issue was the injuries. The injury, the issue was, could he play? When would he be available to play? Because he missed a lot of time with the Lions. He missed a lot of time with the Giants. So if he came to the Ravens, guess what he would probably miss? Guess, go ahead, guess. Guess what he would probably miss? Exactly, a lot of time. We have experience with this with Sammy Watkins. If somebody tells you, if somebody shows you who they are, believe them. Believe them, believe them. And my saying, I ain't got no problem with a receiver on a high price salary. I got zero problem with that because what I believe, you get what you pay for. And if you want quality, you gotta pay for quality. I get that. But I would just be scared that if he came, he would come with a high price tag, no problem with that. But that'd be a high price tag coupled with the injury history. That would be what would scare me. That part would scare me. That part would frighten me. So I would have to say no to this one. But let's read their reason why. The New York Giants are the only team, not considered a playoff contender, among the five teams with the least cap space available. It's all right, that was funny. Stuck with several large contracts until next off season, the Giants should be concerned with dumping long-term money as acquiring new talent. Since the Giants can't afford a major acquisition that fits their timeline, the best they can do is trade Kenny Galladay. Galladay failed to click with quarterback Daniel Jones in 2021 after signing as a free agent from Detroit. Maybe his hip injury from 2020 lingered into 2021, but a lack of chemistry and consistency were concerning. He produced just 521 yards on 37 receptions. Finding a new home for Galladay is complicated by the fact that his new team would need to pay his $13 million base salary in 2022. Baltimore would need to reshuffle some money to make this work, but it has a need for a playmaking receiver after dealing Marquise Brown during the NFL draft. I ain't gonna comment. Galladay would give Lamar Jackson a trustworthy, big-body threat who can win on deep jump balls better than anyone currently on the roster. So, the only thing I disagree with there, trustworthy. Trustworthy because, again, the injuries, the injuries, that's the biggest thing with that whole Kenny Galladay one is the injuries. So, that one would also be a no from me. Say for instance, he dealt with a lot of injuries throughout his career, and he was making like five meal a year. I'd be willing to take that risk. Yeah, I'd be willing to take that risk. But to have all those injuries, you need the base is 13 meal, but I think the cap hit is more things like 18, something like this, something crazy. But I would be like, nah, I just, I would not want them to do it. But anyway, I just, so for some of them, some of them trades would do a decent now. Some of them, like the Chuck Clark one, okay, that was decent. The Scotty Miller one, that one was decent. But the other two, the Marcus Peter, no, no, no, no, no, the Marcus Peter's one, no. And the Kenny Galladay, no. And then on top of that, it'd be giving up Nick Boyle. So, it's like, man, so, I mean, both teams would be like, it's like they would be swapping injured guys. Like, hey, you went on injured tight end. Hey, you went on injured receiver. Hey, it's a clean sweep, clean swap. So, yeah, that's a no from me. But anyway, Team Keeper Clean, I appreciate y'all, I love y'all so much. Go check out LaMolla Jackson Restaurant, man. I promise you, you won't regret it. But just like Bleacher Report, BR Gridiron is trying to make a lot of these players when it comes to them being on their current teams. We are out.