 Mark Bailey from FIG Securities joins us now live from Sydney. Mark, hello to you. Thank you so much for being with us. When it comes to that NFP jobs data, it does really seem to be all in the detail. Mark, it seems somewhat disappointing about the, somewhat disappointing about the one-tenth of a percent rise in earnings. Nonetheless, the figure still shot the lights out. Yeah. Good morning, Natalie. It was kind of a mixed bag in terms of the data from the non-forms parallel, as you kind of rightly summarized that the headline figure there was very strong at 227,000 jobs, created well above expectations there. Even though the unemployment rate did tick up slightly to 4.8%, that was largely driven by an increase in participation rates. So again, that was positive. But as you rightly point out, and this is one of the Fed's key measures that has given them a bit of comfort in terms of being able to dial back those future interest rate hikes. The actual wage growth was very, very disappointing, only at 0.1% month-on-month and 2.5% year-on-year. So that's the slowest since August last year. And I think again, it gives a Fed a bit of breathing space as to the next height. And you did see that in terms of what happened in the US Treasury. So after the non-form payrolls came out, there was a rally in the US Treasuries, for example, a 10-year yield did drop around about five basis points to 2.42%. And also, you saw the expectations change in terms of the percentage expected in a hike in March. That fell to 24% from 32%. So again, the market consensus was pushing that hike further out. Interestingly, later on in the day, the San Francisco regional president, John Williams, who's actually a non-voting member of the FOMC this year, and is actually known as kind of a quite a centralist centrist in terms of his views. Actually say, look, March is still live. Look, I still think it's reasonable to expect three hikes this year. And that kind of sent Treasuries back in reverse. And we actually closed unchanged on the day in the 10 years, for example, at 2.47%. So it reversed those earlier gains. Now, my read on the figures and what actually happened is look at the figures, look at the wage growth. That's what the Fed is going to be focused on. And John Williams' comments whilst interesting, he is a non-voting member. So I would be tempted to place less significance on those and more on the actual data. And I think we're looking probably out towards June for the next hike from the Fed. Certainly suggestions that there's little price pressures at present coming through to force the Federal Reserve to raise rates at that March meeting. Let's sort of shift our focus ever so slightly to Brexit. We're now seeing the Article 50 bill now progressing to the next stage. Certainly we are hearing more noise about banks moving headquarters offshore. I mean, realistically, however, what do you see sort of the next few months looking like? There's going to be a lot of uncertainty in the next few months with regard to Brexit. That's going to impact the Stirling bond market and the UK guilt market and also Stirling. And the next stage is that it's going to go to a committee and that's going to start later today in the UK. What that means is that the committee will go through the proposed bill line by line and propose amendments to that. Now, the Labor Party has already said that it's going to be around about 250 amendments to that proposed bill. And again, that process is on both sides of the parliament as well. So the Conservatives will go through that as well. And there's obviously quite a few pro-European Conservatives that are disgruntled that they're having to go through this process. And so they will be also adding amendments to that. So it's going to put a lot of pressure on Theresa May's self-imposed end of March deadline for triggering Article 50. There's also concern that the parliament may not be able to get a vote as to whether or not it is a bad deal. Remember, Theresa May in her famous speech said, look, no deal is better than a bad deal. And also there's concern about reciprocal arrangements between UK citizens or British citizens, I should say, in Europe and European citizens living in Britain as well. And they want to guarantee those rights there. But again, it's a very difficult cat and mouse situation that until she triggers Article 50, the European Union said, look, we're not going to negotiate anything until it's a formal process. So again, I think it's just uncertainty in the markets on a geopolitical scheme of things at the moment, both from Trump in the States, from Brexit and also later in the year. You've got some very significant European elections, obviously France in May and then Germany later on in the year. So I think politics is going to be a big driver of financial markets and sentiments in particular, whether we like it or not. And it's always important to keep a hand on, especially what Trump is talking about, what he's tweeting about and some of the policy implications of some of his more random comments and views and tweets that have impact in the market. And you've seen that in terms of the impact that we've seen on pharmaceutical companies, on health care, on defence companies as well. And that's going to continue as his thoughts become more publicly known through tweets and through his comments to the press as well. So whichever side of the Atlantic you're on, politics unfortunately are going to be driving or a key driver of the financial markets in 2017. And certainly interesting to note those comments that came through last week from Bank of England Governor Mark Carney saying that the 15 minutes of fame for the central bank was over and, in fact, seeming to welcome that attention is now moving back to government and policy side rather than that emphasis being placed on central bankers for economic prosperity. Mark, we are out of time. Thank you so much for your comments today. Thanks, Natalie. Have a good one. Just to take viewers across some breaking news coming through pertaining to Duet Group, the company establishing a $150 million debt facility.