 Lleidhechys. Mi ydyn nhw'n Gwymylla Torwyn. Rwy'n ydyn nhw'n Gweithredu i i edrych o'r Unedol, y Unedol Llyfrgell i'r Prerydol. Ac rwy'n gweithio ymlaen i gwestiynau'r unig. Mi'n gweithredu i Gwestiynau Gweithredu i'r Unedol, ydyn nhw'n Gweithredu i'r Ymlaen i'r Ymlaen i'r Ffood. Rwy'n gweithredu i'r leidhechys grwp. Charles was the chief of the lead expert group of the foresight programme on global food and farming futures. This was a two-year programme of work commissioned by the UK's Government Office of Science, led by Professor John Beddington. So, it was a two-year programme of work. It launched in January 2011 and cost around £1 million. It also had the political leadership, if you like, of two ministries within the UK Government, the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Department for International Development. Those two ministers providing oversight and leadership of the programme of work. I think it was very important in terms of making sure that we got both a UK centric but also an international environment and food system approach. It also meant that the findings from the report could feed into a whole range of different arenas much more easily. So, Charles, what did you think our main outcome? What was the thing that satisfied you most about the foresight report that we did best? I think the great advantage we had was that we were able to look at the whole of the food system. We weren't constrained to just looking at agriculture, for example. So, we were able to look at both the issues of supply, demand, issues of waste, issues of governance. And we had the privilege that we had the resources that we could go out and we could get real expertise coming in. And so, I think we produced about 50 papers, about 2,000 pages that are on the web for people to know where. So, we were able to do that and then we were able to say things that involved our food system. So, looking ahead at some of the challenges, we were able to say that essentially action was needed, not just on supply, supply issues were very important but demand was needed, changes in governance. And also, we were able to look at each of these issues through the twin perspectives of sustainability, the challenge of climate change but other effects as well. And also issues of equitability, equity and the needs of the poorest, especially in living countries. So, I think it was our ability to look at the problem holistically that has most pleased we were able to do in the report. Certainly for me, I thought one of the very strong points was the recognition that hunger is also very much of a political issue and that you need more voices coming in behind the need to address hunger, which otherwise governments can often forget. I think we also had some very good, clear practical examples from around the world of where policy and practice is moving in the right direction. So that rather than people throwing up their hands in horror and saying there's nothing to be done, actually there's some very clear examples. But Jules pretty good together, did he not? A survey of? Yes, I mean so often the narrative from Africa is that it's all doom and gloom and it comes to food production there. And of course there are fantastic examples of what has happened in agriculture, both in conventional agriculture, but also enormously impressive examples of how smallholder farming communities have been enabled to increase production. And Jules pretty got together, I think it was, 20 examples of smallholder initiatives which had really taken off and asked of these which were scalable. And I think it's a very positive message. Some of which were quite well known for example tremendous progress that has been made in agroforestry in the Sahel or the push-pull system of increasing biological control in maize crops in Kenya, but others were much less well known. And hopefully that will help to spell some of the unremitting gloom and doom you sometimes see about food production in Africa. Some very nice examples of sustainable intensification in practice to flesh out what that might mean as a term. For me certainly I thought that one of the great strengths of the foresight project was the fact that it didn't stand alone as something trying to say something perhaps completely new and different. It was very much building on a number of other such reports and in its turn I think has offered a lot of insights and findings that other people, other governments, other commissions on food will find useful. So that bit by bit over time we build a really strong constituency of people working in this space, draws in lots of different stakeholders from many parts of the world and builds that political weight behind the urgent need to invest in our food systems now. Thanks. Thank you.