 NATO chief voices fear of war with Russia while U.S. greenlight's drone strikes on Russian territory. In what anti-war's Dave DeKamp describes as a rare acknowledgment of the dangers of backing Ukraine, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg acknowledged a fear of something going horribly wrong and leading to a hot war between the nuclear armed alliance and Russia. In an article titled, I fear a full-blown war between the West and Russia, NATO chief warns, the telegraph writes the following, quote, I fear that the war in Ukraine will get out of control and spread into a major war between NATO and Russia, said NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, responding to a question about his greatest fears for the winter in an interview. He told Norwegian broadcaster NRK on Friday that he was confident that such a scenario could be avoided, but that the threat was there. If things go wrong, they can go horribly wrong, he added, end quote. And things absolutely can go horribly wrong when dealing with an increasingly aggressive standoff between nuclear superpowers, as we have seen from history. The last Cold War saw many nuclear close calls as a result of technical malfunctions and misunderstandings, including an incident during the Cuban Missile Crisis, when the only thing which prevented a nuclear-armed Soviet submarine from deploying its weapon on the US military, was one officer refusing to go along with two others who were giving the orders to fire. We got a taste of this horror once again last month in the long minutes following the erroneous reports that Russia had launched missiles at NATO member Poland. The fact that cooler heads have prevailed up until this point does not mean that nuclear brinkmanship is safe. Any more than a game of Russian roulette not ending after the first couple of trigger polls would mean that Russian roulette is safe to play. So Stoltenberg is correct to be afraid. There absolutely are too many things that can go horribly wrong in such a standoff, and there are simply too many unpredictable moving parts for anyone to feel confident that this will not happen. And it's pretty crazy to hear Stoltenberg voice these concerns even while the Pentagon gives the go-ahead for Ukraine to begin launching long-range attacks on targets inside Russia in its war that is being backed by the United States, because those two positions would seem to be pretty strongly at odds with each other. In an article titled, Pentagon Gives Ukraine Green Light for Drone Strikes Inside Russia, the Times reports as follows. The Pentagon has given a tacit endorsement of Ukraine's long-range attacks on targets inside Russia after President Putin's multiple missile strikes against Kyiv's critical infrastructure. Since daily assaults on civilians began in October, the Pentagon has revised its threat assessment of the war in Ukraine. Crucially, this includes new judgments about whether arms shipments to Kyiv might lead to a military confrontation between Russia and NATO. This represents a significant development in the nine-month war between Ukraine and Russia, with Washington now likely to supply Kyiv with longer-range weapons, end quote. The Times quotes a US defense source as saying the following, quote, We're not saying to Kyiv, don't strike the Russians in Russia or Crimea. We can't tell them what to do, it's up to them how they use their weapons. But when they use the weapons we have supplied, the only thing we insist on is that the Ukrainian military conform to the international laws of war and to the Geneva Conventions, end quote. They are the only limitations, but that includes no targeting of Russian families and no assassinations. As far as we're concerned, Ukraine has been in compliance, the source says, which is a strange assertion, giving that US intelligence has reportedly concluded Ukraine was behind the assassination of the daughter of Alexander Dugin. Ukraine has been careful to use its own drones, not US-supplied weapons, to carry out the strikes, The Times reports, while also noting that Pentagon officials have made it clear that requests from Kyiv for longer-range US weapons, including rockets and fighter bombers, which could be used for even more effective strikes inside Russia or occupied Crimea, are being seriously considered. This revelation comes days after Ukraine launched its most brazen attack into Russian territory yet, with drone strikes on bases which killed multiple Russian soldiers and damaged two nuclear-capable bombers. Not too long ago, the US waging a proxy war that features direct attacks on Russia's nuclear forces would have been an unthinkably terrifying prospect. Yet that's where we're at now, and it only seems to be escalating. Empire apologists will try to make this a conversation about whether Ukraine has a right to attack Russian territory, which is a red herring from the real issue at hand. Obviously, Ukraine has a right to attack a nation that is attacking it. That's not the point. The real issue is the danger of provoking a hot war between nuclear superpowers, which even the NATO Secretary General is becoming increasingly nervous about. The Western power alliance continually ramping up aggressions to test how far it could provoke Russia is what led to this conflict in the first place. Now we're at a point where there isn't much space for Russia to back up before it's against the ropes and potentially pressed to do something nobody wants. These people should not be talking about escalation, they should be talking about de-escalation. We need diplomacy, de-escalation, and détente. And we need them yesterday.