 That's not me, so I'm the ISR president and I'm about the membership meeting in five minutes after Tuyushin Takagi has presented problem chairs report. I'm Tuyushin Takagi, program coach here. Another coach here is Thomas, he is currently coming to this conference and I will present this program coach report this year. This year is the 23rd annual international conference and the first ISR group started in 1999 in Japan and there are several ISR group conference in China and this is the first time in Hong Kong. This is a statistic of the number of submissions, so in the 90s we had about 100 submissions and after 2000 it increased a lot, about 314. After that, so now it's around 250, so this year we have 243, so it is a statement now. And this is the number of submissions by countries for most of the submissions comes from China. And the second one is USA and so last year USA was the number one country in the sense of non-submissions this year from China to Hong Kong like this. And so then German, German, Japan and so on, so this is a similar phenomenon from the last years. And so this is a statistic, so number of submissions by subject, so we have many submissions in publicly cryptography and cryptography protocols and then so similarly cryptography. And this year, interesting, so we have many submissions for some countries and so on and so forth. And we have accepted 67 papers. From last year we studied the parallel session, therefore we accept more papers than before. Now the 67 papers are accepted and the distribution is like this. So we have a cryptographic protocols there and so similarly and so on. And so in Asia 2017 we have 48 PC members. So I'd like to thank the people who conducted it to reduce the members. So this is a whole number of 48 PC members. And over we have so 334 external data, of course we cannot handle this number. So I'd like to thank them to have these various papers. Okay, so this year we have some new files in Asia 2017. So in that, so we produce new data from Asia. This year we accepted 146 papers for second review. And so in the second review sometimes there is no updated comment for final decision. Then so this year we try to make a summary of the second review phase and we ask the PC member to write some, so such as hammering and so send to the author in the executive, so in the second phase. And this helps the author to develop their paper further. And so as I said so this year we have also parallel session and we accepted many papers. So we thought out 67 papers. And so something here is also here, best PC member of us. So we try to encourage the PC member to do one active review process. And so we have selected two PC members. Hello, that's not unique. Are you here? Congratulations. Okay, congratulations. Okay, and so as you see so in the single track so we, the PC member has selected the best paper to this paper. And so 200 maps to this paper. And they are recommended to submit their revised version to general cryptos. And so this selection has been done by voting in the PC member. And so congratulations for this paper. And so in Asia cryptos of 7D we have three excellent invite talks. So two has been already done. And so tomorrow we will have this other invite talk by Aster Payet. So he will talk about five books of cryptomania. So please encourage to come here. And finally, I'd like to thank the general, so Kojiya Spankavan and see you here. You are not here? Ah, okay. And so also so Lucas and Hasain has very, so maybe an open effort to organize this conference. Lucas and Kasano are not here? Well, they are very busy. And also some are subs. So I'd like to thank them. They have made tremendous effort to organize this conference. And so I'd like to thank all the authors of this conference and session chairs. And so all the participants, so thank you for coming to this conference. And so we hope that you enjoy Asia cryptos of 7D. So thank you very much. So screen. Very good. So I'm, I'm Chris Encashio, the president of the IACR. I will lead you through this membership meeting, which is one of three official assemblies of the IACR with a membership and the membership that's you. So I'll first introduce the couple of details about the IACR and we talk about our operations. And then we will talk about specifically about the membership and the financial report. We have a treasurer here today, so he will give a financial report. And then we'll talk about current discussions in the board and open discussion in the end. I don't know if I can talk, but if we're nearing the time, so we have to show them. So the IACR is an organization incorporated in the U.S., in the latter, where tax laws and other laws are supposedly easy to organize associations. In one picture, the IACR looks like this. We have the membership assembly that rules and so it's a very democratic organization. There's board of directors where you elect directors and officers. There are nine direct directors and four officers. And there are other members of the board of directors such as the editor-in-chief of the Journal of Drutology and the general chairs of the conferences, of the general conferences who are members of the board of directors who are running the IACR. And they are all very responsible for this range of activities that you see down here from cardiology schools, over the conferences and symposium, the proceedings and the general transactions that we come to talk about later on. So you, unless you were already a member of the IACR by attending the previous conference, you would be a, in 2017, you would become a member for 2018 by having attended and registered for this conference. This means that you're supporting your organization by the membership fee, which we use to run the organization specifically for the central cost. The cost that is at conferences will of course be built through the individual conferences. But in case you forget to go to an IACR conference in one year, which I would not hope, you can also register during the next calendar year online and become a member there. So I mentioned already the board of directors that has about 20 members. We have a list of nine, everything is in the website. The website by the way is one of our main activities that we run, because it's the one and only communication vehicle that we are using. So the Journal of Cryptology, which is the Journal of the Association, the current editor-in-chief is Kenny Patterson. The access for you as a member of the society to the papers that are published there is possible through the IACR website in an area where you say publications, and then you go to the access of the publications, and where you have to authenticate with your IACR password, that will give you access to the publications. If you want the paper, then you register for the first time for a particular, and you become a member for a calendar year, you'll have to pay some extra. But in order to save some trees, not many people, or office space, not many people actually are able to receive the paper. There is a new journal, two actually, two new journals, that we have started in IACR, and both of them are conference journal hybrids, as we would say, we call them transactions. The first that started that was the IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology, or TOSC, available at TOSC.iacr.org, replacing the proceedings of FSE. FSE is an area conference of IACR focusing on fast symmetric encryption, originally, but nowadays, the scope is broader, but mostly symmetric key, as it says here, Symmetric Cryptology. It is published together in a collaboration with the Bochum University Library, and it's available for open access. This means you don't pay anything, and everybody can access the publications there, and we are relying a lot on our volunteer stuff, and on volunteer work at Bochum University for running this. The model of the operation of such a conference journal hybrid is as follows. Because there are issues throughout the year, but there is only one conference in the year, you can submit every three months, and you are promised a fast review within the next three months, or even two months, similar to a conference, and the decision can be accept, condition, accept, major revision or reject, and then you can resubmit in case of a major revision, after the next deadline or submission deadline, and that creates a more permanent effect, compared to a more permanent dialogue between the authors and the reviewers, slash editorial board members, or PC members of the forum conference, and this is one of the goals of achievements. The second goal of moving to this format was also to increase the number of papers that can be handed throughout the calendar year. The papers will be published online, as I said, it's a journal, we call it Transactions, the opportunities of the opportunity to speak at a conference does not go away, namely if you have a paper published in a certain interval, in a year-long interval in TOSC, these Transactions, you will get the speaking slot at the corresponding limits. So if you want to be at FSC 2018, you have to have a paper in January 2018. That has been running for a year now, like this, and we just start, we will start, we are in the process of starting, the website is already there, and the sites are going to be online, by the way, the IACR website, if you go to the documents of the IACR, the slides are pretty much the same as I feel that crypto and neurocrypto are the same, so you can see them online. So the Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems is replacing the proceedings of chess, and will be published again in the same model, together with Open University, and will also be available for Open Access Gold Open Access. So the next submission round for this is coming up in January, and then it follows the same quarterly submission process as TOSC. So we have the same procedure now for these two transactions, these two IACR Transactions. The conference proceedings in Springer are remaining five of them, as we have here, for example. They are available online as well, you're probably aware of this, if you have accessed it from your home computer instead of your university or corporate network, and there you did not have a subscription, then you will authorize the IACR website at the website, the IACR website, and you can get access to all current issues. However, after three years through our deal with Springer, they become Gold Open Access, that means they will be available online if all of them three years to everyone can reach. The Eprint Archive is something else that we operate under the IACR. The Eprint Archive is a pre-print server. It is offering rapid access to documents, to the papers that people want to publish before they are, to release before they are published and approved. So it also serves as a time-stuck server. And editors of the Eprint Archive who look at close to 1,500 or maybe close to 2,000 submitted papers each year are such a multilevel and don't kind of report. There is an activity that we started recently called Schools in Cryptography, a couple of years ago. The IACR sponsors, co-sponsors schools in crypto that are typically summer schools, winter schools, spring schools, whatever. And if you have a good proposal for such an event, then we will not organize it for you, but we will give funding if it matches our criteria and if there is not too many others who also would like to get a search fund. So for example, we have had a certain shortage of search proposals in the recent years, in the recent data submission rounds. So we will sponsor in early 2018 a school on information here in crypto in Bangalore, but we haven't been able to sponsor more in that coming interval. So if you are interested in running a school or planning something, in the second half, typically of 2018, applying for such co-sponsoring by the deadline of December 31st, is very much encouraged. IACR also organizes a fellows program. Each year a number of members are selected as fellows for their contributions to IACR for their technical and professional contributions to the field, such as advancing science and technology, promoting the exchange of ideas and also developing skills in the sense of being teachers and also promoting the IACR and the cryptology community with respect to others. So this year, the following five were selected by a fellows committee that runs independently of the board of directors. Yanka Maynish, Blueview, Komil Kim, Christopher Parr and Kenny Patterson, and at least Komil Kim is here, congratulations again. End of the year brings a lot of work for everyone, so there is a submission deadline here as well. If you want to nominate someone, please see the website and the nominations will do December 31st. Okay, now I come to a financial report for which I would like to ask our treasurer, Brian, to join me here. All right, there we go. I hope you can hear me. Hi, everyone. I'm Brian Walker. I'm your treasurer. I'm the person who takes your funds and gives them back out. So let me tell you where things are. As of the end of last month, a couple of days ago, I've got everything up to date as of that point from the banking side. Our balance sheet is about even where it is last year, which means our assets were about the same place as it was last year. So we're not making a lot of money. We're not losing a lot of money. That's kind of good for a non-profit organization. It's working not for profit. Our administrative overhead continues to be very low, and in the long tradition of treasurers, giving the log base to numbers, we have a robust financial position on our assets. Our log base to our assets is about 21. These numbers are current as to what I pulled out of the Asia Crypt registration system yesterday. So here is attendance at all of our general and area conferences for the past three years. 2017, 2016, 2015, you can see I've got Asia Crypt in 261, and I had 262 from last year according to the system, but basically Asia Crypt this year is about the same size in terms of attendance as Asia Crypt last year, and well above where it was two years ago, so great to see the growth there. Overall, you can see there's been growth in total attendance at the IACR consistent. Our total attendance across all of our events was 17, 19, 2015, up 6.6% to 2016, up 3.2% again this year, and next year I'll add another column in for real world crypto because that symposium starts as an IACR event in January, that is next month in Zurich, and I believe registrations for that are already top 300. I'll mention later. You'll mention later? Okay, well I guess I can't talk about that. Now I do not yet have FY17 numbers since we haven't closed, we run on a calendar year basis, and some people haven't turned in their final financial reports yet for conferences that have already happened. You know who you are. Here's the numbers for 2016 as to where our income comes from and then I'll show you the expenses, but basically Eurocrypt, Crypto, Chess, and AsiaCrypt are their top four conferences in roughly that order, and then TCC, PKC, and FSC come in in terms of this is income, this is all registration fee income for those conferences, and you can see roughly where we spend the funds. And then if you look at our expenses, they are roughly in the same proportion because while we have fixed costs on conferences, mostly it's determined by the number of attendees we have. We have size things. Now sometimes what happens here is I put seed money out ahead of time, so a lot of the AsiaCrypt funds on expenses here were, you know, on all of these are seed money that we put out ahead of time, and in fact I've already put down money in the sense that I have sent seed funds out to Eurocrypt 2019 to RWC for 2018, I think, so I sort of pay bills ahead of time. That is if you are running your general chair, you ask for seed funds from me, I send you that, and then you give me back the leftover, and it goes back into the ICR conference. Highlights from this year, the one that you all would have noticed was we moved to a new registration and credit card processing system. This was because I did an analysis early in the year of how much we were paying the processed credit cards, and we were paying about 6.2%, which they hid, we deal with Wells Fargo, and when I asked them if they could do better than that, they dropped it to an effective rate of 5.7%, and we went over to Stripe that charges us an effective rate of 2.4%. So that alone, which we didn't have an effect for Eurocrypt that started with crypto and chess and TCC and AsiaCrypt, we've saved almost $20,000 in credit card processing fees on just what we've processed this year. That's more money we can use to support students and schools and things like that. We can also accept sponsorship payments by credit card too, if you are a general chair of a conference, one of our conferences, you actually have the ability to create sponsorship invoices in the registration system and have them paid that way. It's a little bit more expensive for us to take a credit card for a $5,000 sponsorship than to take a wire transfer or better yet send me a check, not made out to me, made out to the ICR. But we can do that for some sponsors, that's the easiest way to get them to sponsor and pay us. We now also can accept payment in Bitcoin. If you want, Stripe our credit card processor does that and it's actually cheaper for us to process that. We only paid 0.4% to process Bitcoin transactions. We have received three registrations to RWC so far in Bitcoin as of yesterday. Okay, so thank you whoever that is. The other thing that I did was I've been trying to, given that we have log base to two to the 21 assets, roughly in dollars, I've been trying to make the short term money that we have to hold on to work better for us. So we're getting 1% on a chunk of our short term assets now through use of basically a better savings account locally. And the next thing that is my big project is to start tackling sort of our endowment that we use to fund schools and students and things like that and to try to do a little bit better job on the investment side of that while still remaining conservative and appropriate to a non-profit organization's long term investments. That's something that we have an investment committee within the board looking at. I have one obligation at every, yes sir. Are you going to hold on to the Bitcoins? Actually, we don't have the Bitcoins, right, because Stripe converts some of the dollars immediately. There's no float. So yeah, I know, we just lost out on running up to 11,000 Bitcoin. I would prefer not to speculate on cryptocurrency. You all want to do that and go ahead, but I don't think that's a conservative and judicious use of the IACR funds. Now, if anyone wishes to donate Bitcoin to the IACR, we have to take this. I have to recommend the membership fee. That's my one task every membership meeting. And no time do I see any reason to change our fee from $50 per full member, 25 per student member. If at any time I think we should raise or lower that, I'll let you all know. But for right now that seems to be appropriate for funding the ongoing operating expenses of the organization. Because we do have, even though we're an all-voluntary organization, we have a certain amount of fixed costs every year that we have to pay in terms of running our Nevada business, filing our non-profit tax return, running the website, running paying for the software that runs web sub-brev, things like that and all the journals. So there's a bunch of things that we have as ongoing expenses that's about right to cover it. So at that, I am open to taking questions of a financial nature or anything else because I'll pass off a Christian. Anyone got any questions? Yes? Are you aware of any guidelines for how much endowments a non-profit would typically have as a function of the number of members? No, I'm not. I've never seen something like that. I think you would really more look at what the endowment size should be in terms of what you want to fund off of it, not in terms of the membership size. Right, but if the endowment keeps growing, then it gives an opportunity to use part of that for the membership. That's true. It's not growing as much as it should right now. But yeah, that's a fair point. In fact, one of the first things we have to do, and this is what the investment committee, or the endowment committee is going to do, is we have to formally define an investment policy statement for the organization. That's something that can be done as part of that. In terms of what's an appropriate goal for that? What are we trying to fund out of it? How much income do we want to generate out of it? That's what we're thinking. Frankly, I'm still trying to get a handle on how much we're actually spending to fund student speakers. We now, through the updates to the registration system that Doug's to Bill have made, that Doug gets on the print for this, have an ability to really track that and see, you know, get a handle on how much income do we have to generate to cover the things that we want to cover off of that. That's a good point. Other questions? All right. Well, I'm around. If anyone else has anything, you can find me. Thank you. The membership secretary supports as of the time at Crypto, because of the stereotype he's not here, which repeats some of the information that Brian had before, but in a different way. So here's a number of members, which of course you see that many of them go to multiple conferences. Many of them go to multiple conferences, but then again, not too many, because you had like 1600, 1810. So that means that the total membership down here, yes, for 2017, as of August, was there. That, I think, was there. You will certainly be able to increase this next year because of the first time when all of you see is an ISCR event, the real world. Supposedly, I'll mention, the attendees there will be ISCR members only in 2019. Here's the source from where people became members. This is roughly by the calendar year, the first conference you go to is where you become a member. If you do not make it to an event in any particular family, you can still register online. And a lot of people do that here as well. Yes, so that's it for the report from the membership secretary. Now I want to go back to the presentation here. Oh, online services. We are running a website at IA.CR or IACR.org. The webmasters are Mike Krozerweig and Yu Yu, and you can present some of the things here. I just want to show you the slides because you haven't seen them yet. We don't have a recursive one. No, we didn't. Okay, so you know the website. Yes, so if you go to iscr.org, you will receive alerts from iscr.org. You can see all the announcements at our main page of the website. And you print the report, you go to iscr.org. And if you are looking for a job and you can go to iscr.org. And also if you have an opening and you want to advertise it, you can also go to the same URL, slash jobs, then you submit your job description. Then when deemed it's interesting for the crypto community, actually the criteria is quite minimal. It's just relevant to crypto and it could be economic or be the industrial related. Then we will approve it and it will appear at the website as soon as we approve it. And also if you want to advertise your event, you can also go to the event page which is iscr.org slash event. In some ways your event which is relevant to crypto or security. And it's actually more. Is it another page? Well, this is now the publication. You can also receive it from Facebook, Twitter. But this way of recently we have like the BioWord makes this thing not working for the moment. And you can subscribe to our main list. Actually we have also the PhD. The PhD? If you are a PhD and you want to publicize your PhD thesis, you can go to iscr.org PhDs and make a submission. And then once it's approved, everybody will see your PhD thesis. Next question? Next question? And then this is the iscr publication process. So if you are actually up to date and if you want to see the recent iscr publications including all the area and every conference and major conference, then you go to iscr.org.publications. Assuming you are active iscr member, meaning that if you just attended this conference or you just paid the membership fee, you can log in with your credentials and you can already download the recent iscr publications including these print proceedings for this conference. Yes? This is small business. This is more and more. So this is e-print and you already know and if you have met us while e-print you can directly contact the e-print editors. I mean as already said you can have access to all the electronic versions of the proceedings and these two I already talked about. And if you are interested in the very exciting of historic crypto papers, you can go to the museum of historical papers. And we also maintain a bibliography about actually all the published iscr publications. And from time to time we actually we have like these petitions. Yeah that is pretty much it. Yeah? Okay. Thank you very much. We mentioned already, Ryan mentioned the cryptography research fund for students which is essentially the endowment that we have created from a large donation some years ago. Where we from the central budget of iscr or from this research fund we waive the registration fee for all the student speakers at the iscr events. And we also support cryptology systems. And there are videos as we can see there's a camera here and there are all cameras around. We make those online in the iscr channel. When you submit your paper, no when you submit the final version of your accepted paper, you give consent as of recent, we also give consent to us making such a recording. Because we feel with the parallel tracks it's important that everything is recorded. It's possible to log out but it requires a special exception policy. I would like to thank Kevin McCurley who is here for maintaining the video channel and this is a lot of work. Thank you very much. That's right. YouTube is our service platform for the moment. Okay current topics. This is now what I'm going to report on recent developments in the iscr that happened in 2017. The iscr has joined forces with the real world cryptography organizers to create the iscr symposium on real world crypto which is an iscr event. That means that attendees will become isr members as we said before. It's not a conference that has proceedings. It's also not a conference that has the usual academic selection procedures. Even though you can make submissions nowadays in the form of suggestions for talks, there was not going to be anything published I think. But you can suggest talks. It's not going to be evaluated according to the ordinary criteria because people from industry who work much more often with the real world standard people in academia, they will not be able to satisfy those criteria that we usually apply in the academic selection of things. So the conference, the symposium as we call it, features a series of enix to invite and solicited and contributed talks. And the next one will take place in January here in Zurich. So it's pretty soon, it's in about one month. And it's organized by a colleague of mine at IBM Research and a colleague at Google. I'm being told that the venue has a maximum limit. It's about 500 people and we have already 90% of the seats sold out. So if you want to come, then you should actually register pretty soon. The board has also decided and is still deliberating a bit on a conflict of interest policy to be installed formally for the general conferences. That's your group or major group, at least. So the existing policy and guidelines was relatively relaxed that each program chair would have a flexibility to decide what constitutes a conflict. And since there is now a number of years already, the anonymous submissions and since there are more people in the field and they're expanding the field also, neighboring to other topics to other communities where conflicts of interest are seen sometimes in different ways. They talk to mathematicians from maths or theoreticians in crypto or two people more from electrical engineering and systems engineering. They have all different notions of conflict and the board is going to reach a consensus on what should be the new policy. And this new policy will include a few steps here that are going to look reasonable for many but also unreasonable for some. But basically the board decided that advisors and advisee have a conflict within two years if you were in the same institution with an author who had a conflict. When you have two papers in three years then you have a conflict so it's not as simple as you have one paper in this year. And this is on the basis of related policies in our neighboring fields and the detailed document is still in the making so you haven't been able to see this. But we are talking to our program chairs about this as well. I think we can, if anybody wants to discuss something about that instead of waiting the discussion will be a good time now if somebody has a question about that specific topic or this discussion. Yes, I suppose the only question is how to enforce it because you're going to rely on people's self. Well the question is how to enforce it. It's difficult to enforce yes but I think the first step of enforcing is even informing. And that's why the submission system must have an option where you as an author selects the people according to these rules and making it transparent that this conflict is already the first work that's actually now a duty of the authors. And it's a more formal duty of the authors with the research policy that goes into the cuts. And also PC members. And they're PC members because PC members should not see all the authors but I'm afraid that it shares. If they take their work very literally they will have to check 340 papers times 5 authors times 15 program committee member relations which is too much obviously. So we are relying on everyone here. And even though submissions are made anonymous sometimes it's clear to some people who the authors are that they will be able to raise something and discuss the program as full visibility into authors as usual. And so this is something where we call the community to action in a way where in response to some critique we have also received from other fields where they have strong conflicts. Okay. Yes. And authors define then their own COI during the time of submission. For example I don't like PC and I think this guy doesn't deserve to bring my paper. The system can just take a COI and I can specify risk or just to leave it. Well if you mean like negative solution. I know that he or she hates me so I will more. Now that is a delicate question. There will be a raise on this in the policy document. It should not be the case that you do this as an author. But as I said before we are relying here on authors honestly to declare this. Correct. It might be the case of course that the program chair realizes that person A declares conflict with person B whom they never jointly publish together if they have such a conflict. Did you mention again. Is there any ongoing work to make sure the submission software will at least capture the affiliations in a canonical way. That's a good suggestion. I think it's not capturing affiliations in a canonical way. I'm not sure if it captures affiliations. Here we are usually expecting that the submissions of the submitters would know with whom they share institutional affiliation. Part of this if you're in Google or in a company like IBM this can be large but part of this is also defined here. This building is not completely out whether different locations of the same company count as the same. Does the system also check the same for sub-reviews? The system cannot check this for the sub-reviews but that's why more communication should be needed. But the system I mean we cannot hold on to everything. But declaring a policy that people should respect should be the first step. Like if somebody sends me my paper for sub-review then I should say no I'm an author right? I should not say on the other hand which reportedly had happened. I'm writing a very good review because I cannot reveal that I'm the author to the PC member. We were laughing but I heard such cases. Other board discussions are creating a test of time award. This is something that the TCC conference has. An ongoing discussion about adversity in various dimensions. I think this brings me to the end of the planned program and there is now time for an open discussion. Any questions? Yes? The question about sub-reviews or sub-reviews system is about comment or order. Now there are many conferences and they get conferences about the revertal system. The authors have the opportunity to reply to the comment. The issue is the comment or order received by email or submission systems are sometimes different. So you're saying that the response to the revertal of the authors is not fully integrated. I think this is probably recognized by the people who maintain the system. But I have to say that that system that we are using was produced in Multiverk mostly by Shia already. I think his interest to grow into many more features has sort of faded a bit. So we rely on others to help him here. If you can do PHP, then I'm ready for your email. No, I mean that's a discussion we've had a while ago. Whether new features we should add to web sub-reviews or whether we should try to use a different system. Unfortunately there are not so many different systems. And people here have become used to that system quite a lot. So there's certainly a new measure to change. There are also some special things that we have added to the system that the ISDR wants to do. But we are considering the submission service as well. Thank you. Yes, so I think the remark was essentially that if you get the mail from the authors, they will reply to PC1 and reply to review 2, that the chairs would just make a suggestion in the mail that may clear to which review you're referring. I wasn't aware of that specific issue. I could imagine that in contrast to some other system that this system randomizes the order of the reviews. Because other systems sometimes don't. They thereby leak some information on who. I think it's up to the order. If you're doing an alphabetical order, then you'll leak a lot of information. No, but my point is that the chairs should just hand in the mail to the reviewer. Okay, then this is a comment that I would like you to send to us so that we can distribute it to the program chairs. Anything else that people want to bring up? If not, then I think I have the travel program here coming up, which is of the real world crypto. There's going to be Eurocrypt in Tel Aviv. There's going to be crypto in Saint-Volhra. In August, there's going to be Asiacrypt in Brisbane in New Year. There's going to be Eurocrypt in 2019 in Darmstadt. And there's going to be crypto in Saint-Volhra in 2019. And there's going to be Asiacrypt in Japan. And that's about as much as I can tell you now. Except for crypto, I would now guess that it's going to be Saint-Volhra. But we have had, indeed, discussions about diversity among North American or American countries about where to run crypto. Canadians have made a say, yeah? So, but now there's the era conferences. As I mentioned, there's FSC, there's PKC in Rio. And there's going to be chess in Amsterdam next year and TCC in Goa, India. I think that's it. Now there's an FSC also in 2019 already fixed. And I think many of you are already involved in planning future events. And that's it for me. For my side for tonight, we will see each other at the round session. Thank you.