 Again, so I have to call to order the August meeting with the up for commission, 6 p.m. The first item on the agenda is the agenda. We'll hear a motion to approve the agenda. For a second? Second. Any discussion on the agenda? I would like to propose an order of that for the proposed but I noted that the date that is listed in the adjournment section of the agenda for next meeting is not correct. It says August 17th, which would have been a regular schedule meeting. So that is late September 21st. Yes, so the next meeting would be September 21st. Hearing no further conversation, all those in favor of adopting the agenda as amended please signify by saying aye. I will propose an agenda. Item three is public forum. See no one from the public here. I see no one on the screen. So we will close for the forum. Item number four is the consent agenda. Do I hear a motion to approve the contents of the consent agenda? I just want to take that there are no information about this particular consent agenda. Okay, so we added the agenda item number there. I don't think the person that we were going to be able to add it. Yeah, it's not. It's like adding it. Okay, it says it's not added. It was not. I'll make a motion to approve the consent agenda. So I do this also. All right, do I hear a second? All right. Discussion? Yeah. Just a few items under item 202 election chair. There's no second list. I believe I made a motion on that. You did. You did. I think I made the same. No, I think it was. I believe that's correct. I'm sure. I should have got that. Right. That was one item on the second page. Under 503. The voting on that is the 600. So just. Obviously it's still zero. And then on page four under 1103. I just. The last. I said. Other comments. So yeah, two of my three, which is good. The third thing is this is just, I just wanted it to be part of it. And so I think it's good that we've made it going forward. Anytime. Our next meeting is not. At the regular schedule time. We have decided to change the meeting time so that anyone going back says, why don't they, you know, August. Instead of the normal. So. I was going to make. I was going to propose that we modify this. That we did this because we wanted to review grant and. We had. We'll be grants approved contracts and also to accommodate staff vacation. August. Any other discussion on minutes. Hearing none. All those in favor. Octavian minutes. Actually. It's percentage. Minutes. As amended. We're saying that. It goes. Thank you. That carries. So. Just quickly, Tim. I'm just got on my computer's one or somebody could promote me on my. Second. Okay. It's. It's. Interesting. Your computer. I was just asking to be promoted I logged down on my computer instead of my phone. I was just looking to get promoted. Is there am I doing something wrong or do we have to be promoted each time we log in. We do. Okay, no problem. But you are not promoted. No, he's using good promotion. No one locked. Okay, so we're up to item five. The first one is 5.1. These are going to be gobbling oak resolutions because there's actually two cards to each. I thought I saw an agenda at one point, the election of the vice chair. Yes, that's, we have that. We have the infrastructure items. Okay, sorry. Yeah. So, I mean, so this is going to be along with it. But I'm willing to entertain a motion to recommend to the board of finance city council, and the approval of an FAA grant for environmental assessment and then the associated approval to enter into a contract for that work. Do I hear a motion to that effect? So moved. Say I'll say on that. I'll say that right discussion. Nick, do you want to take a moment? I'll be brief and then really this is Larry's project here. So it's part of our master point, one of the identified projects to analyze the environmental impacts of all of the other projects essentially or at least the other projects was this environment assessment. This is not a full environmental impact statement which I'm sure many of us have heard of it before this is an environmental assessment specifically for some obstruction rules around the vicinity of the airport required by FAA after 14th or 177. It has an extensive list associated with it. A lot of those types of assessments will be performed such as each one of those identified in the memo. However, this really is pretty small in the scale of things when we're talking about essentially tree rule, which is really primary instructions on the field outside of the airport property as well. There are different types of environmental review and these are the only, this is the only one that runs to the level of environmental assessment. The other projects that were identified to become an environmental assessment. Funding, this is a 90% grant that we do not have yet. Every time this year, it's a 90% grant by the FAA. 100% comes from a... small portions from the state of Vermont. We have a lot of... last year, as well as passenger facility charge. I have a question about because this is mostly tree removal. I didn't know if South Burlington has any regulations about removing trees. I know, for example, this community on a building does have South Burlington has that as well. You know, like this included as far as they would. Okay, this is the review. Okay, we would have to secure any other. Okay, so you will not hear this. Correct. And then, you know, then that brings up another point. Of course, not to remove the trees because we still have to work with it. This is largely just a safety thing if I were to draw a line above the airport and anything that went above the line. Yeah, absolutely, that's essentially what it is. And when we also are working on the breach, right now, a very similar situation where there are obstructions or potential instructions, including our approach pass. So that's that's exactly what I think those obstructions are. So it's a pretty large loss of land that goes out from runway 15 or towards 10 rates. And so that land right there that it sits on to you. We do not. We do not. So every time we have to protect the equipment from environmental impact, we have to manage whatever city it was. Yes, but we also have a property. So, so a lot of those to be able to get Jason areas like for the pleasure area up there. Yeah, for example, yeah. We don't want the majority of them. It's for instruction. So you don't have to ask every time you have to get it. That was. Oh, well, I don't know for sure. So. This is just the first round of getting a brand that helps to manage. I got it. We have a general idea of how many trees need to be removed. So we, during the master plan process of, you know, very large document, but some of those sections in the master plan identified every single one of our services every single one of our approaches. I was starting to that in 2018 2019 time period, obviously, thanks to me to grow. So we have a general idea of what those instructions look like a special. And that's going to this is going to help identify some of the impacts of those instructions. That's well. Was it a wetland? We have to follow to take down trees well. We'll have more information later on, let's see the actual studies. We can. In terms of the extent of. Yeah, yeah, we can bring that as a future agenda item. I know there's been a number of something, but usually there's some requirements for public comment or hearings and things like that. EIS being the very, very, very high level, high, tense public comment type of environmental situation. I'm not sure if it requires a hearing, but I think it requires a public comment. The documents. Any further discussion. Approving item 5.01 please signify by saying I have any of those 500 more carries. Next step is item 5202. I'd be willing to entertain a motion to recommend the Board of Clients Council, improve FAA grant for a new passenger boarding bridge, as well as the execution of contracts with Engelberg and Jacobs and again to carry out the work. We're here in motion to that. Thank you. Thank you. So moments ago I just got an email from Senator like office said that the FAA accepted this trend and that is our process of awarding this grant to us. So this is the replacement of the 12. Recently we have changed that now is. It's our signage. So this is a brand new jet bridge is not replacing a jet bridge brand new jet bridge at the end of the terminals integration projects and new bill that will be here. That will be installed after we open it's not going to be ready. I'm going to commentate the large aircraft that are off of the side of this building right now. Right now we have frontiers. Occasionally not in doubt, but just by every airline using that gate as a, as an option for them. So this is the jet bridge and the associated work. The associated work for that particular project you can see the size of the project is of this magnitude majority of that cost is the jeopardy itself. Of course there's quite a lot of work to construct the jet bridge. No, so, so this is closest to the entrance to the airport. This is the closest side to the gate 15 which is jeopardy 14, which is delta airlines. Those are those are in order for the past years when your past year, you're actually going to have a lot of work to do. So as you come through the new area. It's your first one. It is the top of the stairs. And it's just going to be the same. This is actually going to be one of our largest jet bridges that we have at the airport. So that we can accommodate the smallest aircraft. So the largest aircraft has the right to get any requirements of that rain. Every very long. Act on, as you mentioned, the operations were opening up. You got the terminal project was still open and would be a ground boarding position. And as far as funding goes, this is one of the two fiscal year to two professionally directed spending bills from senator Davis office. So we would not have this challenge without that funding opportunity, because the FAA originally essentially deny a jeopardy of the terminal project. They didn't feel it was justified for our, for our ability, we didn't need another chapter with a congressional directed spending. It removes the justification process of a new project. Of course, it still has to be eligible under federal rules. Justifying that. So this is extremely, extremely skilled. And the only option would be stairs. So that's what you're using right now stairs to go down, right to go stairs to go. What about the 15% contention students the FAA cover that also. I don't say they cover it right off the bat until we close the grant down. So if there's change orders and then point Larry processes change orders will be a contractor or engineer. So I get work and Larry's okay into the change order. And then the FAA always says this is approved contingent on federal funding. So when we close the grant memory closes the grant, then we apply for a grant. By law, by the end of the day, important program, handbook were allowed to go 15% above any grant is eligible, but not necessarily guaranteed. Yeah, and yeah, we had to go into that 15% but very few. So, but we are very careful. In other words, Larry just. Further discussion. And I would like to entertain a motion to recommend for the citizens council to pull up an FAA grant for the residential sound escalation program as well as the execution of contracts with any a construction and general games group to carry out for the grants. So you have already seen eight houses. We've gone through the grant, we've gone through the construction contracts of eight houses, which are essentially happening right now. In fact, we just signed the contract with the same company that you're seeing right here for those eight houses. This is the next part of this project. So eight houses were part of the pilot program. This is part of the next phase, which is an additional seven houses of design in construction. This is an additional 54 houses of design, but just design work for the next year's current process, which is, which is really important. The design outreach to very unique circumstances of this particular noise project. The essence of this entire project is to reduce interior noise levels of electrical residential units that are 65 average. So, between the eight that you've already seen, the seven here and the 54 that were designed. These are the first houses that are going through the sound aviation program. I mean, I was the most qualified bidder on both projects at this point. So they'll be working on the total of 15 houses over the next several months until next spring. This is the next door. You know, one of the important pieces of I think we've had this conversation before is our original estimate pre coded really you're just about told it was around $50,000 per house. And it's getting over $100,000 perhaps twice the cost of performing a sound aviation effort by the FAA is still very much committed. I would also like to see that there's four of us with additional grants to support this noise program for my guests. It's also very committed to this project. I had a great conversation with that person just this week, committed to the local match of this project, sometimes not all of the local match because there's very specific regulations that they have. So we have to support relations that we have to follow. But supporting the local match or portion of the local match with these very projects, you reduce interior noise levels. You're also reducing an impact that should say increasing your efficiency of your actual house. So there's a real benefit for their programs to coincide with this as well. And at that point, has Vermont gas committed to a specific timeframe. How long they will continue to support this group. They have now and I did receive their lots. And the MLU, I believe has that timeframe. However markets is beyond that timeframe, which are or has to be well on that time. And it said exactly one year and I don't know if it will. But then it definitely to this project. What's really important for VGS skin for the airport is that these past now this grant some past eight house project. So it will pass grants over the last couple of years and then 100% so that was shared. So the eight house program is 100% by the FAA. So there's a BGS share, although there's still benefits for BGS is we're still partnering with them to coordinate work with the homeowners to still offer their efficient programs. Yeah, so the end of you with BGS is 1440. I think so. And that was part of the conversation of either evaluate adjusting or, or. Sorry, what was the question. This is for, so there's eight houses that are already designed as construction. This grant would be for the design and construction of seven design only of additional 54. Yes, that way we have, we have numbers for grant. We're not. And this, this rounds out everything in the 70 or above, you know, not everything, but, but we're getting to. We're going off the tie for two, once we did, once we get those prices next year's application will consist of the construction of these 24 hours. Plus the design exactly. Right. Do we know how many will be left in 70 or above after these. I can be corrected, but I believe there was in the neighborhood. There was a number of them, but I, I, I was in that. So there's still a lot more houses in the same. I had a lot of files. Is it normal for the FAA to do money to mitigate like this. I mean, this is a lot of money, and it's very specifically targeted. This, so this is a, this is actually a really good question because this is not in competition with our construction or other projects that we have going out on the airfield. This is what's called noise discretionary farming. So every year when the FAA gets appropriate, the portion of that preparation has to go towards ways to engage across the country. The FAA has assured us, our team assured us, that they want to support the Brompton Airport's noted voice program at around a $5 million a year and every single year for this most mitigation problem. Because the quantity of houses right now inside this 65 degree of the amount is over 2,600. So it's going to take some time. We get more, we get easier approval because of the F-35s. I mean, slowly we have noise levels that are not just normal commercial traffic. And there's others of those around the country, but for our unit as long as ours to make as much noise as we make, right? So it's a different, it's different balance than somewhere that says has an entire base associated that most of the people that are impacted by noise live on the base. You know, so it's a funky kind of place that we're having the whole for making that noise. Yeah, it's very true. And right now federal funding included from military to mitigate noise. I just wondered if we get more green lights into that. Not necessarily because it's the F-35, but because of the quantity and the size of the program itself, the quantity of houses. Which, which of course is related to the data. So that interactive, it's an interactive relationship and it contributes to the FAs prioritization of remittances at the time of receiving some additional funding on an annual basis because compared to other airports in England, the East Coast and around the country, we are very high on that. And we're going to get good data from this first round that tells us if we double what we expected that word. We have to show that. Yeah, absolutely. So one of the requirements is to make sure that the interior noise levels are reduced to an average of 45 dnl or a five decibel reduction. So we have to show that to the FAA, especially as part of the Israel Eat pilot program, that that's going to be very imperative to being successful at the FAA. So they actually go in and tell somebody to test it. So it's, yeah, they do a acoustical testing, which is like a white noise. They test the difference of the exterior versus interior variable. And that's why that's what we did initially with these regional houses. And that is what confirmed to the FAA at all houses 70 dnl to the 70 floor dnl are now eligible for noise mitigation without additional acoustical testing. So we're going to be doing some testing after the projects are completed, but initially we will have to do the acoustical testing. And you're mostly testing at the same time every day, how do you get that system because obviously different things make different noise levels and we know it makes the worst noise levels. So when we're looking for that, I mean, is that like, is that the one that we're really trying to mitigate? Yeah, it's highly technical. But there's very specific. Because I'm sure that's like the house of people and the house is big, right? And it's not necessarily testing how loud the machine is, it's testing, it's testing how much the wall that we built reduces that to get from there. There's contour level down to that 45. So, so it's, it's, it's more than just the, the noise that has been, you know, our speakers, it's that reduction. But it saves them a lot of time. They capture it over a amount of time. It's, it's a couple of days. It's not necessarily that each house is different. We hear testing. I think there's 14,000. Yeah. Do we see that as a nice little one? They showed the speakers. Yeah, I mean, it would be a trajectory. They have 35s for confidence. So they're not testing aircraft noise. So they're making their own noise with a speaker. So how high does that go? It's the same. Right. But I mean, is it the same as what the numbers are in that? I'm just thinking from a neighbor point of view, like, how is this going to be explained to me so that I know that this is going to make a change? Yeah, no, that's a, that's a great question. It's a very regulated way, which is very similar to our noise explosion, which is a model computer. We have to follow those specific procedures, which model an aircraft noise. You know, you're not going to hear a hundred decibel sound coming from a speaker. That's not what they're going to hear different models of noise to see what the reduction of their infrastructure is today. Obviously, this has been. Yes, it's very fast. This has been years of work moving from acquisition to installation. This is the first. These are the first 15 right there. Thanks for that clarification. I have some more questions. On this item again on the next item. We also are working with a new Department of Defense, which is called the Office of Local Defense Creation Cooperation, which is an alternative on the source for that. So we're going to be having a conversation with the office in the past, we're continuing to work to to make sure that this is always picked up. That's a deal. Thank you very much. Any further discussion? Hearing none of those in favor. We'll be back in a second. I'm going to pose. I'm going to carry this last step. This collection is 5.4. And I'd be willing to entertain a motion to recommend to the Board of Finance City Council, the approval and the Bay grant for updating the current notes exposure map, as well as the execution contract with Jones, Spain's Group to carry out the work on your data grant. So, so as we move into noise mitigation and the houses that we just spoke about, and I'm going to explain it at a high level. So just as we move into those eligible houses, the very first documents that we need to produce is what's called a noise exposure map, which is exactly that identified the average noise levels over an entire year period of time, and over 24 hour average. That noise map, of course, identifies certain current score levels on and around the airport, showing the 65 dvdnl, which is a day level average. There's penalties, there's noises outside of a certain hour or a 10 decibel penalty. That's what that dnl stands for. So that noise map identifies those noise factors, 65 dnl, 70 dnl, 75 dnl, anything between the 65 and 75 dnl are eligible for certain noise mitigation efforts. So that means that noise compatibility program identifies what we would like to mitigate and how we would like to mitigate those properties. Acquisition, noise insulation, we have a program called Purchase Assurance and Sales Assistance. So there's different opportunities for a homeowner to work with these programs to mitigate noise and those particular properties. We just updated our noise exposure map in 2018-2019, we received the acceptance of the FAA as of 2019, and in conformance and in collaboration with the Air Force, which within their environment impact statement of the F-35s, they identified out one year after full operation of all 18 F-35s, they were also reading their maps and we committed that we would help with the FAA would also do our two maps. One is DoD and Air Force regulated maps and actually uses a completely different noise model software program that the Air Force is currently moving forward with their mapping procedures over the next couple of months from your time frame. Ours is an FAA-required noise model system, different program and different reasons for that different program and that's what this particular grant is under going is to update our 2019 map, which actually updates an existing condition in the future forecast map and will identify all the aircraft at the airport, GAA, commercial and military aircraft and use real rate over that one year period of time and also now use one year full operation of F-35s at this airport. So this is a very large update and probably potentially could shift this exposure to transport lines. It's going to take some time, hopefully by summer and if we can receive this grant sooner, hopefully by summer next year or late summer next year, we can publish these maps, we'll have public meetings, public hearings, public comments on this map and we will submit to the FAA for their acceptance once it's accepted and we can shift our most capability program to do exactly what we're doing, how we feel right now, which is sound information. So this is the start of an updated most exposure. Sorry, who makes it? Who creates it? So the map? Well, the military creates their own map with their own consultants and then we hire Jones P. Group with a sub-consultant called H, they're one of the leading consultants in the country that actually built the FAA, ready to separate regulations and programs or test some of the procedures for the voice map process. We've been using them for years, even before this 2019 map. And there are the ones that can be highlighted and published together. And feel free to dive for this. Is there a sense that the map, the current maps are going to have much change? And yeah, it's tough because without, you know, why I don't know from a certain limit, let me break it down into two parts from a civilian standpoint, from the similar FAA version. I don't think so. We've had some decrease of operations and some changes in the type of background, but not a significant change to the 2019 version. So from a military standpoint, from all of the information that we understand, it seems to compare to the EIS data or the EIS projected operations itself. So I don't believe it will, but there's a possibility that, you know, I don't know exactly where the radar is. Profiles of the actual aircraft and how the thrust profiles are supposed to work. So there is, I would say it is more unlikely that the map does not change to the extent of the changes. Right. And I guess that's, I'm thinking about that in the context of the next step with the compatibility of what that might do with the current the current list of properties that are being reviewed and analyzed and once they're in the queue. And the future years, if some of those are not going to come out, we're going to have more in or how that's going to break out. Kind of the prioritization of what what are the value of it. So, right, obviously, nothing we can figure out right now without having to match. So I'm just thinking more for longer term what that looks like and what the context of, you know, is there an equity issue involved with, you know, if the 70 expands a little bit more, we're going to start looking at all of those phones that might be in South Burlington and not do some for example, another community. Exactly. Right. Right. Yeah. Yeah, it's really, it's really tough to say, right, you know, that's, I think, you know, a general concept that's exactly what it is. And I think it's important to go towards a higher DNL because as, especially at the 65 as those contours shift right before or typically we'll update this back every five years. As those parts of my shift back for obviously, you know, I want to start on this outside picture. Right. So that that that can be tricky. And we're not. I don't see, I don't know, but I don't see that. So I just want to build on that. So many men that there is remediation in progress when the map shifts. Are those houses eligible to continue. Yeah, yeah, if those houses were within a grant that we're working on right now to decide that they do not shift for their system. So the, the grant includes specific residential addresses and not a generic within a certain DNL. That's, that's, well, not necessarily so no right now the grant is not this or does it. The agent. So as long as it's in the design, or as long as it's included in a grant for design or construction, if that DNL shifts, either that's not longer in that DNL that we're eligible, it still looks forward because it was already. Yeah, that's correct. And the only caveat that I don't know the answer about, and we're years away from this. I don't know if, if we're working on a grant when a house is in this, I don't know what the answer would be. And then to build on the other thing that Eric mentioned, and the allocation of the properties across our surrounding. Briefly walk through how we went to the first time so that everyone knows how that works. That might unfold again, the second time. Right. Right, and bigger to because it was an extensive process to go through an updated noise. That's why a lot of these houses were purchased. So that was an extensive process as part of the noise program. So after we received approval for the FAA programs in that, then we moved to what was called implementation, which is, which is online at btpsar.com, which identifies the priority and the ratios of houses across the community. Based on essentially the ratio of how many houses are in each community. And with the understanding that the higher the DNA, the closer it is on those kinds of lines must be accomplished first. So as we continue to grow outwards and reach dnl is that it will be posted. And the ratio will start going across those communities as well. Right now it's just 70 dnl is just shy of residential units in the new scheme. So as we hit that closer to dnl on the edges of the proctor line itself, then we'll start ratio now across the community. So that in the purpose of that, and through many conversations of public meetings and conversations where you should from those various communities the purpose of that of course is to equitably fund those communities through that $5 million cap, making sure that those 15 houses a year are spread amongst everybody eligible. We do want to continue to get some of the disparities of financial availability and low income houses and things like that across those communities as well. That's really, really difficult side of things because they're they want to see higher data on those first something that we do want to do before. I think it was incredibly optimistic to think it was going to grow. The amount of each. Yeah. I can see it mostly staying the same actually. An example would be when we transition from 2016 back to the 2019 is the characteristics of the aircraft right at 16s you using afterburners and all the civilian aircraft, and then the forecast that they have 35, which had a less than 5% use when when the F 16 was here, it was much wider. That's more circular around there versus the F 35. Yeah, but you're going to be outside. That would be the examples that contrasting. So we're going to have more. I mean, that's my word. I mean, it's not the same as everything else. So I think that it's not likely to the idea. Yeah, that's correct. Now, the 2000. I'm trying to be less. Because there's so many nuances to this program. When we produce the map we're actually we're going to be producing and publishing two maps, like I said the existing condition map future forecast. In 2019 that's exactly what we did existing condition. Future forecast which is the F 30, the map that included the F 35. So we'll do that again, and that future forecast will make sure that the future operations of the civilian side of the airport will be adjusted as well as well. One of the other nuances since we that there are two maps that are being created that I imagine that the National Guard map. Just, what's the purpose of that is the final map consolidation of the two or they just do in their own map for their own purposes. So, we talked a lot about the environmental assessment for the trees. One level above an EA is environmental impact statement. As part of that environmental impact statement, they were required to produce their own maps required to do one here I think you got it because of what was written in that yes. These are DoD standard so that map is now using a different modeling system which is called those maps. But that's essentially what it is that map cannot be used for our purposes and for federal funding. That's why we need to create a different map under the 14c of our part of the 50 process to form it with the FAA's regulations and programs. Any other discussion on slide 24. Hearing none, all those in favor please stand by. Okay, I'll be quick. I don't have much for you to know the exception to the action I took last time and tonight, we will be applying for two more grants. One for this month, one for the south apron which was kind of a commercially distributed spending. Similar to the G-12 past boarding bridge and we will be applying for the bipartisan interest as you know the renovation of the north concourse and as a result of TSA moving to the tech. So those will be moving forward in the next month. They will be however, it's federal grants in the federal fiscal year which is after October 1. Any questions from me. I have a question on item number nine. Okay, is that okay, which you're on the. Okay, so we, we applied to the grant to the pilot program. We applied for 10. Okay, right. However, and we did have one back down. The cost came in 110,000 versus 50,000. We worked with the FAA, speaking into that 15% that was asked about before. Okay, and moving that nine one into the grant and just what we got. That's one of the next eight. This was a total 15 to 15. Right. Yeah. So that's accurate. It's just what we had to do to get your name. That's all I have any questions. Let's see. So likewise in the last two weeks. We're going to do things for the last report that we get to use to go. We're being that when there's two weeks out. Also, you're at. So, I'm always like, I'd like to report your end when things are a little bit more concrete. So usually you're at some place and just present that as part of the line. So that's where we're at with that. But I did because I had all of the numbers for the exception. I didn't have the numbers yet. So what you see on the recovery metrics sheet is actually is true for all of us, I said, for the PFC. So it shows you where we ended up the year for those are definitive revenues and they did that really well with the, you know, by and large with the recovery. So that's where we ended up the year 2000. We just wrapped up 2022 was turned out better than we had budget. And then as far as passenger loads, they definitely have positive impact on all of our numbers. And we also see a car possession and safety is being very strong. Today. The question I had that I was kind of thinking about the last time that we met, which was about a month ago, was that having gone through the effort several times the last month. It's very, very clear that we're, we have companies that are severely staffed from people loading bags to TSA to even outside on her is our staff and where we wanted to be at our budget or we having the same kind of crunch that everybody else is having another risk that how does that impact our budget. Well, I'll take a step and jump in. I think from operational operations, folks are administrative folks are maintenance folks were actually full set world except for maybe Yes, Monday, Monday. I think I'm on the car and show me can talk to this as well if you want, you know, we, we've done so much outreach and so much. I think what we're struggling at your port city Burlington staff is our entry level decisions, which are some of our customer service forward facing positions. We have seven openings currently. So our schedules are running very. I think there's two parts. And those are mostly ambassador positions, correct. Yeah, so those are just those are some of them. Keeping eyes on the curve. Exit security in just general passenger systems. We have some progress to a show just done a great job recently hiring three people that to join your team, which have just come in the past couple of weeks. Some one two months advanced. So she's making progress but yeah those those entry level extremely competitive positions of our hourly salary with other outside entities. We actually just had a phenomenal increase for our staff. They were great. I think it's a great contract if you'll have a great system. It was not way to operate so they actually all move to the same step. And then we'll see the 7.2% as well. So we're starting a bit more. I think, I think, $17. So we're not none of our positions here. But still, even if we're outside investors that's a little drop in bucket for your budget that shouldn't have a huge impact looking at the end of the year. And so none of these other people in the airport that employ people on the earth, right? I have friends at Miss White's because they couldn't check in. There's so big one person to do it, but that doesn't impact us other than how we look to the public right. That's true. Yeah, it's not something that can really control. No, it's not, but we can, we can help and we work with those partners to make sure that we help with their advertising or sharing social media campaigns or, we'll see job there's right here in this room and up on this. But it's kind of funky, right? Because the airlines are not actually employing people. Like we don't have Japanese people on the ground anymore, right? Correct. None of our airline carriers employ their own. There's separate third party parties. There's a lot of airports, especially that I size that I close to the party. Sometimes it is. Yeah, yeah. Jeff Lou is the latest. They were the last ones to have checked who employed staff on the ground. And now it's, they have contracted out to a third party company. But they've done that across. Marie, can I ask a quick question? Yes. First of all, thanks. I like this. This is the first time I apologize. I missed that he showed these recovery metrics in this way. Yes, I have to say, Tim, he had the idea and he actually put together the charts and the spreadsheet. So I don't know what I have to do is update it, but we presented it last month for the first time. But it's a nice way. I think it's a really good example to show what has happened historically because it's so challenging with we have some very abilities for month to month depending on the time of the year with any of our partners, our car concession revenues are much higher in the summer. That's just their season, you know, we see certain months in the way of parking garage being super high. So it takes, removes that month to month variability that usually have a good point in time to really reflect how we're coming. So I think that's a really good way to look at it. Okay, thanks. Yeah, I think I find it very helpful, especially now. Thanks, Tim. Are you available to do chart ticket revenue and sponsorship. I did. I just want to make sure I understood so when you're saying at February in the metrics like parking at February 2020 what is that 6.67 million mean in terms of February 2020 is that what we were projecting. That was 12 months of these are at each number like each data point is showing 12 months of revenues at it so that would have been from we'll say from March of 2019 of February 2020. Yeah, that's kind of like that's before right before COVID. Okay, we were having a normal business without any business interruptions or variations. So that's kind of the starting point our parking lot, all of the revenues we're doing except for Broadway. And just for the benefit here, we saw a significant growth in the plaintments and the year leading prior to COVID so 2019 we hit a dramatic high. And then it was even more painful to have the reduction I guess. Okay, and so the current, the current is the previous 12 months, starting with leading up to June 22. Yes, so that would be July to July 21 and June 22. Yeah, that's how we're doing that's how the recovery is compared to that initial. All right, and then you will in subsequent packages. I think it'd be great to include this not to overwhelm you but this and you'll still do this sort of, you know, the different metrics that you typically share with us. You know, the cash report. Right, so I'll have all of the other than normal the cash, all of the revenues all of the expenses you'll see all of that. And this will be every month will have this so that starting column at your 2020 will say the same. But we'll just, we'll just go out on the current months and the chart. Great. Thank you. Great question for your worries, you know, back when you think back to when the budget was for 23 was put together. And you look at, you know, we've been now the data through to some of the stuff on there, but pretty pretty much there. How are you feeling about the revenue projection. Again, I think we've put in a reasonable number. We did not use a hundred. We didn't go down how would they comment on concessions I went higher on the CFC zone here because I know that we're going to be higher, but the parking, the landing, the PSC's I'm still was using about 90%. Because to give us a wiggle room, we really don't, you know, there's things that are just out of our control, right and I rather, I rather hope for at least that and hope that we see that that things to run on the path that they're the line that they're doing, but I, I won't bet any money on it. I'm cautiously optimistic and it's it's much higher. You'll see that on the next financial report. Of course another backstop, because we do need to remain cautiously. Whether we're talking about COVID or some of the issues within the airline industry, like I was sure to do something like that. I think that's a significant amount of cursa and our funding related still. And some of these numbers in the key that we are. Our expenditures are covered most of them, whereas now we can push that aside just for a little while make sure that we don't need those in the future, or at least in the near future. Yes, for now. That's not always going to be the case. I think there's going to be a day that we come to you saying we're going to spend a substantial amount of money on those cursa. We have a lot of funds for X, Y and Z projects. One of the things that we are looking at which, which is not happening in me, but there's a possibility of a call that's happening in legislation or, or, you know, there's some conversation happening at the National Legislation and pulling some of those funds back into the FAA is obviously we all need that, you know, on that, and there's substantial amount of work and capital projects equipment that we could be using this funding for. But again, right now this year we have to be very cautious. But then we'll be back though. We'll be more than cautious. We're either more recovered. We are looking for schools for larger projects. And the question is different. I'm going to move on to item eight. So eight point one is the vote on the airport patient vice chair. You may remember last time you table this because Jeff was not able to be present Jeff is present Jeff as trustee is interested in continuing this vice chair, but I certainly will entertain motions for as such or motions for anyone who is interested in serving this vice chair. Are there any other auditions for next year. Here we now call for a vote on the vice chair. All those in favor of Jeff Shulman as my chair, please see the time to say hi. Hi, any opposed. That carries congratulations Jeff. Thanks. I didn't even get to use my campaign speech and that's. And special thanks to Tim for his good leadership and not placing too much of a burden on the vice chair. Now that you've done that. All right, so move on to item eight point two, which is the director of aviation. So we had our first round interviews yesterday. We have three more dates set up over the next two weeks to wrap up first round interviews. The goal of that process is to identify three between three and five candidates to move forward to a second round of interviews so you're underway. They're a long start to get to that point. That's where we stand. Oh, that's a good question. I think it's for 70. I'm trying to be in that but I'm obviously. David is on the committee. I wanted to be. We had Jordan Riddell as the chief of staff in the city of Bremerton, Karen Paul, the city councilor. We have Thomas Chinden who is the. I'm sorry, let's care about the city council. We have Thomas check. Thank you for counting for me. We have Thomas Chinden is this program south of the city councilor and also to the county state, state center. We have Christine law mayor is he. We have Matt Harding. He's the head of the HR department at City of Bremerton. Thank you. Here at the airport. She's the head of the HR department at City of Bremerton. Every across section of municipalities and worlds that would interact with Dr. Well, Matt and Dave. Working. He works here. He's made. He's the head of the HR department. He's the head of the HR department. I'll make a question. And then any other commissioner. And you have one small update hot depressed today. I think August 15th meeting with the city council. I don't know if you can see it. I don't know if you can see it. I don't know if you can see it. I don't know if you can see it. But I'm not sure it's the report of this commission. Assuming that goes well. We will. It's the first time. Later because the timeframe. I'm not sure if it's the report of this commission. But in regard to the seed that was created. So it's a charter chaker is starting years as the result of that. So that's he technically became available immediately. Get some traction immediately upon a situation. I was a fund governor signature. So I'm not exactly sure why this last process took a little bit longer than the others. But. Yeah, yeah. I don't think it was, it was not advertised initially, the same time, there was some conclusion of the system. That was the situation in my practice to us that they said it was posted there was nothing on there, so you couldn't apply for it. And then suddenly, I got an email saying, hey, they're doing this tonight, city council, are you still interested? Wait, there hasn't been any information about this. But obviously they're busy. So that includes commissioners items. That's not too much to add from the last couple of weeks, I listed out a couple that are kind of top of my mind right now. We've hired and going through the contract process for studying designing this facility shop on the northwest side of the airport. It's a real fence that's also associated with landscaping projects that we're hoping to contribute to the community as well. And before I was just a really good job on that tip project, but we're, we're moving really really fast right now. Looks fantastic every single week. We're also out to date on the North course renovations which is a $2 million estimated to be a project. It's from that in just a couple of weeks for that particular project as well. I think that's how it's still proceeding on the north side of our garage. They are essentially finished up on two things, which I think is clear. Clean up and I think I understand the last week, a big reading game change to the contract, because they have a brand. That's put together between the corporation. And then the last one is to set accomplishments this week. One last week, but we actually celebrated Monday, which is a retirement of Greg Hill, which he's been here for 40 years with a great celebration. And I'll put together just about everything, ice cream truck, barbecue and all sorts of things for Greg, his family, which was there, and the entire important team. And the other staff accomplishment in the second night at seven. Actually, his hand is not here today, but she is off on vacation for the next week because she's getting married. She's super excited for it. The next step is item 10 follow up items. Okay. But back in the day, when I was vice chair, I used to run the follow up items. So, so 1001 is the orientation for staff and public right now, so we still on track for presentation next month. And commissioners just that many other follow up items that we need to keep in mind for September or beyond. And I think it's really just update to the procedures policies. Yes, so, yes, I'll just go on that. So, I think the last few. Yes. And so Eric was great and took time to go through and make some adjustments. I want to make sure that newer commissioners get a little bit of time of the notes and then get your input as well. Traditionally, what we do is we would take this document circulated amongst the entire commission and give you an opportunity to be way in with your thoughts and how the commission should work. You know, so, so the question is how does form work, but you know, some of the things you're talking about, you know, you want to get as many of those things as possible so that we're all, we're all looking at this committee in the same way. Sorry. But yes, we want to make sure we're we all have the same expectations of how we're going to be able to survive. So, in a couple months I'll be circulating months I'll probably wait until our seven commissioners board circulate that around. I'll just go ahead and select your inputs. Usually there's not a lot of confrontations so like this is this document so usually I can just bring it forward. And then we can just go forward and then because I haven't got that so. So yeah, I'm happy to put that on as well. I don't have any idea if that's something that ever reaches us here at the table but I know that he is preparing a pretty giant significant event on September 11. And I know we read the college of being a place was very good, but haven't heard like anything. Are we participating as an airport or is it just kind of their deal. I mean it's their open house, of course, but we will be just we'll have a couple of our trucks days for naming a couple of our trucks there. We're going to put a tent and a table set up and giving away some swag and even kind of a job fair. So that folks know that there's job opportunities at the airport as well. And that's essentially our partnership with them. We're also going to be helping advertising the program right here in the terminal. The open house where you get the terminal. And two years ago we got squashed for 100 year anniversary. Anything ever sort of come out that we are going to talk with. Sure, so we, I mean, we, we did quite a bit with that we do have books with history books. Sorry, I meant like more like an event air show. Yeah, yeah, definitely not nothing that the airport would be sponsoring at the one time. Which is always weird because you can't have any sex. The last time is absolutely outstanding. It was really well done. Yeah, super well done super expensive we participated extensively. And the privilege of briefing with the other birds. Just about every single day. Yeah, it was very cool. Very expensive. It's scary. Sponsored quite a bit of that, as well as our books are called. We're out of reach for the airport falls in our pockets. I mean, do we have an average bucket? I didn't look on the budget. We have about a quarter of a million dollars marketing, mostly spent with our airline partners shares like that. So right now, I don't put too much towards. We help with advertising jobs. You know, a lot of social media. People do at the airport here in the terminal and outside. But right now we're not sponsoring. We have a huge partnership though, operationally on the event and making sure to do this team. Of course, are aware. Of course, we want to make sure that we're present to. Yeah, I know. Yeah. And one of the things that came out of the hundred years is this excellent video that got put together sort of time. Do you guys have the link to that? Yeah, absolutely. That was tremendous. That was great. Yeah. It was awesome to help protect. Okay, we'll do that. One hundred and two. I'm going to do something. Very good. Any other follow-up plans? I'm sorry. Just real quick. Next meeting. I have a meeting down on my calendar for August 17th. Is that a mistake? Yes. So that we, yes, that has been corrected in September 21st. This is, this is essentially taking the place beyond 17. Okay. I don't know why do we typically cancel those on calendars or I don't know why maybe it's my own calendar system, but. Yeah. Maybe it's like once it goes on it stays on. So the next one is. Number 21. Okay, I have, I have it down. That works. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. I hear a motion to adjourn. I was very joining. Thank you.