 We know that the Hubble telescope, the invention of the Hubble telescope in their studies, it shows that the universe is indeed expanding. So do we factor out 1400 years ago that it stated that and pretend that it means nothing? It's absolutely not relevant and it's not relevant to logical fallacies. If the argument is, I, God, create the rain. The existence of rain does not and cannot confirm the truth of that statement. That is logic of fallacious. Do you agree that 1400 years ago? This is not, the 1400 years is irrelevant. This is about a logical fallacy. You want it to be irrelevant because that is... It's not relevant. This is about a logical fallacy.