 brought to you by Tigger, and Eeyore, and Ronnie, and all the friends of Poo. And John, about another minute or so, and PAO should be set to go. And your stripes are nicely aligned now. This is for all of you or anyone. Let's try the Coke, and how has it tasted? Processing apparatus. Coca-Cola is the major corporate sponsor for that experiment. It's an experiment, and it does involve a liquid and a gas. Liquid, basically being a sweetened beverage, and then Coke, and the gas being the CO2. Tended, but it had a little bit of mixed success. Some of it has worked perfectly, and it tastes just like it does on Earth. And in fact, several of us commented that a lot of times when we're up here, and you know, the meals that we eat aren't exactly what you can go down to your local restaurant or eat at home. So they do tend to get old after a while, and it really was kind of nice to have something different. But it pretty much tasted the same. We've had problems, or we've had some problems with differences in the amount of carbon dioxide that does end up in solution. And that's the whole problem about this experiment, is controlling how much CO2 goes into the solution, and transferring it, and that same amount stays there. Steven Young with Reuters, a question for John Casper. When they come to write the history books on this mission, and the flight has to be condensed to a few short lines, what do you think will be the one or two highlights of this mission? The lights are going to be the visual stimulating part, which are the inflatable antenna and the small test satellite unit. I think some of the more dramatic results in the long term may be these semiconductor crystals that we're growing. It's hard to know in the future what the most beneficial thing will be that comes out of this flight. They said we have over 30 experiments on board. They're in many different areas of technology and also commercial areas. Plant, animal, science, medical experiments. In the years to come, who knows? It may be something completely different that we didn't pay much attention to, but it will prove to be a definite benefit to humankind. No harm with CBS News. On Pam Stue, whichever one of you is the expert on that system, if you cannot get the laser system to work like you want it to tomorrow, what does that mean to the overall experiment? In other words, how good is the data you get from radar and cameras and stuff versus not having the radar data? The radar data we have is not quite as precise as the laser in the payload bay. The laser in the payload bay, in my understanding, could get the angle, could resolve the angle of the coating or the angle that the Stue satellite makes to us to within a degree or less, probably within a tenth of a degree. Now the video that we get, I believe, we'll be able to get it within on the order of a few degrees. So it's probably not quite as exact as they would want, but fortunately, mainly through the help of Mario and Andy and Mark helping out back in the hab, setting up the cameras and fortunately, we did have some cameras on board with low light capability that they could actually, individually, we could see the retrospectors that are located along or around the outside or just inside the diameter of the Stue satellite. And that's how they determine the angle of the satellite. And I believe with that video, they'll still be able to get some excellent science. Mark, I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the Aquatic Research Facility and specifically the Sea Urchin Experiment, how things are going so far. The Earth Facility is basically a whole bunch of little aquariums. And in those aquariums, we've put sea urchins, starfish and blue clams. Now these aren't big like the ones you might see by the seashore. They're very small embryos, really. And what we want to do is to let them develop for a little while and then fix them. In other words, we stop their development so that we can then see back on the ground how they have developed in some cases over a matter of a few hours in weightlessness and sometimes over a matter of a few days. What we're interested in seeing basically is how does this development occur without the effect of gravity. In other words, what effect does gravity play in the development of these marine species? We hope in the process to learn a little bit more about, I suppose, the equivalent to human bone formation. But in this case, we're talking about shells and the bodies of these small marine animals so that possibly we can infer other things about bone development and possibly even something like osteoporosis, which happens in human beings and certainly is a possibility with astronauts who spend long periods of time in weightlessness. This is Stephen Young with Reuters again, a question for Kurt Brown. This mission was described as a commander and pilot's dream flight beforehand. I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the flying that's involved in the rendezvous you've been doing and the rendezvous that's planned tomorrow and whether there's any analogy between the station keeping you do and something that may take place down here on the ground such as a helicopter hovering over a particular site or a ship fighting against the current to keep itself in position. The flight itself has turned out to be very much as expected pre-flight. It is, I think, a commander's and pilot's dream. We have completed three rendezvous so far in the flight, looking for our next one tomorrow. The training we received on the ground was excellent for what we wanted to do. It looked just like we were in the simulator, but the view out the windows was obviously much more spectacular. The best way to describe flying a station keeping such as we're doing on the PAMS-2 satellite is very similar to flying formation in an aircraft, which a lot of folks do on the Earth. The only difference is we're traveling at much, much greater speeds. However, the relative motion between the two bodies, the satellite and the shuttle, is very, very small. So it's almost imperceptible the changes that are taking place. And because of that, we have quite a few different instruments on board to help us out. We have a COAS, which is an optical alignment device for a site very much like the crosshairs and a telescope to help us perceive motion. We have the radar that's in the payload bay, which we carry on every shuttle flight. We use it as a range and range rate and angle tracking device, which locks onto the satellite and tracks it. We also have a handheld laser, which is very much similar to the ones the police departments use to make sure folks are not going too fast. And we shout it out the windows and measure range and also range rate to the satellite. And then finally, in recent years, we have a laptop computer, which we put all this information we're getting from the other three devices into this laptop, and it gives us an exact position in relation to the satellite and also gives us predictories to show us where we'll be going in the next, say, 10, 15, 20 minutes. And by knowing that, we can use orbital mechanics to our benefit. And by using orbital mechanics, which is pure physics, we can save a lot of prompt. And as shown on this slide due to our great training we've had, we've started off a couple hundred pounds in the negative. And right now I think our last total after the first three rendezvous, we've made up basically about 400 pounds. So we've done a good job and we can't take credit for it up here. It has to be the folks on the ground that did all the planning, all the training, and all the hard work. And we just get to be the folks up here to enjoy it.